• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

控制源:左额下回病变患者的语义、空间和自我相关项目的源记忆。

Control the source: Source memory for semantic, spatial and self-related items in patients with LIFG lesions.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of York, UK.

Department of Psychology, University of York, UK.

出版信息

Cortex. 2019 Oct;119:165-183. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2019.04.014. Epub 2019 May 7.

DOI:10.1016/j.cortex.2019.04.014
PMID:31151086
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6864601/
Abstract

Patients with multimodal semantic deficits following stroke ('semantic aphasia') have largely intact knowledge, yet difficulty controlling conceptual retrieval to suit the circumstances. Although conceptual representations are thought to be largely distinct from episodic representations of recent events, controlled retrieval processes may overlap across semantic and episodic memory domains. We investigated this possibility by examining item familiarity and source memory for recent events in semantic aphasia following infarcts affecting left inferior frontal gyrus. We tested the hypothesis that the nature of impairment in episodic judgements reflects the need for control over retrieval: item familiarity might be relatively intact, given it is driven by strong cues (re-presentation of the item), while source recollection might be more impaired since this task involves resolving competition between several potential sources. This pattern was observed most strongly when the degree of competition between sources was higher, i.e., when non-meaningful sources had similar perceptual features, and existing knowledge was incongruent with the source. In contrast, when (i) spatial location acted as a strong cue for retrieval; (ii) existing knowledge was congruent with episodic memory and (iii) distinctiveness of sources was increased by means of self-referential processing, source memory reached normal levels. These findings confirm the association between deregulated control of semantic and episodic memory in patients with semantic aphasia and delineate circumstances that ameliorate or aggravate these deficits.

摘要

患有多模态语义缺陷的中风患者(“语义性失语症”)在很大程度上保留了知识,但难以控制概念检索以适应情况。尽管概念表示在很大程度上与最近事件的情节记忆表示不同,但控制检索过程可能会在语义和情节记忆领域重叠。我们通过检查影响左侧下额叶梗死的语义性失语症患者的近期事件的项目熟悉度和来源记忆来研究这种可能性。我们假设,情节判断的损伤性质反映了对检索的控制需求:由于项目熟悉度由强烈的线索(项目的再现)驱动,因此可能相对完整,而来源回忆可能受到更大的损害,因为这项任务涉及解决几个潜在来源之间的竞争。当来源之间的竞争程度更高时,即当非有意义的来源具有相似的感知特征且现有知识与来源不一致时,这种模式最为明显。相比之下,当(i)空间位置充当检索的强线索时;(ii)现有知识与情节记忆一致;(iii)通过自我参照处理增加来源的独特性时,来源记忆达到正常水平。这些发现证实了语义性失语症患者的语义和情节记忆的调节控制之间的关联,并描绘了改善或加重这些缺陷的情况。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/16c7/6864601/3b8001d60d7a/gr5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/16c7/6864601/0c4cc38c3177/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/16c7/6864601/56b7ca35fc80/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/16c7/6864601/0c100621c980/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/16c7/6864601/073ace70a2ae/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/16c7/6864601/3b8001d60d7a/gr5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/16c7/6864601/0c4cc38c3177/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/16c7/6864601/56b7ca35fc80/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/16c7/6864601/0c100621c980/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/16c7/6864601/073ace70a2ae/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/16c7/6864601/3b8001d60d7a/gr5.jpg

相似文献

1
Control the source: Source memory for semantic, spatial and self-related items in patients with LIFG lesions.控制源:左额下回病变患者的语义、空间和自我相关项目的源记忆。
Cortex. 2019 Oct;119:165-183. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2019.04.014. Epub 2019 May 7.
2
Shared processes resolve competition within and between episodic and semantic memory: Evidence from patients with LIFG lesions.共享过程解决了情景记忆和语义记忆内部及之间的竞争:来自左侧额下回损伤患者的证据。
Cortex. 2018 Nov;108:127-143. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2018.07.007. Epub 2018 Jul 27.
3
When comprehension elicits incomprehension: Deterioration of semantic categorisation in the absence of stimulus repetition.当理解引发不理解时:在无刺激重复情况下语义分类的退化。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2018 Sep;71(9):1817-1843. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2017.1363793. Epub 2018 Jan 1.
4
Consistently inconsistent: Multimodal episodic deficits in semantic aphasia.始终不一致:语义性失语症中的多模式发作性缺陷。
Neuropsychologia. 2020 Mar 16;140:107392. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2020.107392. Epub 2020 Feb 13.
5
On the functional significance of retrieval mode: Task switching disrupts the recollection of conceptual stimulus information from episodic memory.关于提取模式的功能意义:任务切换会干扰情景记忆中概念性刺激信息的回忆。
Brain Res. 2018 Jan 1;1678:1-11. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2017.09.032. Epub 2017 Oct 3.
6
Deficits of knowledge versus executive control in semantic cognition: insights from cued naming.语义认知中知识与执行控制的缺陷:线索命名的启示
Neuropsychologia. 2008 Jan 31;46(2):649-58. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.09.007. Epub 2007 Sep 18.
7
Identifying age-invariant and age-limited mechanisms for enhanced memory performance: Insights from self-referential processing in younger and older adults.识别增强记忆表现的年龄不变和年龄受限机制:来自年轻人和老年人自我参照加工的见解。
Psychol Aging. 2015 Jun;30(2):324-33. doi: 10.1037/a0039116. Epub 2015 May 11.
8
Typicality in the brain during semantic and episodic memory decisions.大脑在语义和情景记忆决策中的典型性。
Neuropsychologia. 2023 Jun 6;184:108529. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2023.108529. Epub 2023 Mar 8.
9
Electrophysiological evidence for the influence of unitization on the processes engaged during episodic retrieval: enhancing familiarity based remembering.单元化对情景记忆提取过程影响的电生理证据:增强基于熟悉性的记忆。
Neuropsychologia. 2007 Jan 28;45(2):412-24. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.06.022. Epub 2006 Aug 22.
10
Semantic memories prime autobiographical memories: General implications and implications for everyday autobiographical remembering.语义记忆促进自传体记忆:一般意义及对日常自传体记忆的启示。
Mem Cognit. 2019 Feb;47(2):299-312. doi: 10.3758/s13421-018-0866-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Disentangling the neural correlates of semantic and domain-general control: The roles of stimulus domain and task process.厘清语义与领域通用控制的神经关联:刺激领域与任务过程的作用。
Imaging Neurosci (Camb). 2024 Feb 12;2. doi: 10.1162/imag_a_00092. eCollection 2024.
2
Creativity in verbal associations is linked to semantic control.言语联想中的创造力与语义控制有关。
Cereb Cortex. 2023 Apr 25;33(9):5135-5147. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhac405.
3
Motivated semantic control: Exploring the effects of extrinsic reward and self-reference on semantic retrieval in semantic aphasia.

本文引用的文献

1
Shared processes resolve competition within and between episodic and semantic memory: Evidence from patients with LIFG lesions.共享过程解决了情景记忆和语义记忆内部及之间的竞争:来自左侧额下回损伤患者的证据。
Cortex. 2018 Nov;108:127-143. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2018.07.007. Epub 2018 Jul 27.
2
The contribution of executive control to semantic cognition: Convergent evidence from semantic aphasia and executive dysfunction.执行控制对语义认知的作用:来自语义性失语症和执行功能障碍的聚合证据。
J Neuropsychol. 2018 Jun;12(2):312-340. doi: 10.1111/jnp.12142. Epub 2018 Jan 3.
3
On the Integration of Space, Time, and Memory.
动机性语义控制:探索外在奖励和自我参照对语义性失语症患者语义检索的影响。
J Neuropsychol. 2022 Jun;16(2):407-433. doi: 10.1111/jnp.12272. Epub 2022 Jan 11.
4
Varying demands for cognitive control reveals shared neural processes supporting semantic and episodic memory retrieval.认知控制的不同需求揭示了支持语义和情景记忆提取的共享神经过程。
Nat Commun. 2021 Apr 9;12(1):2134. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-22443-2.
论空间、时间与记忆的整合
Neuron. 2017 Aug 30;95(5):1007-1018. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2017.06.036.
4
Neurobiology of Schemas and Schema-Mediated Memory.图式和图式介导记忆的神经生物学。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2017 Aug;21(8):618-631. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2017.04.013. Epub 2017 May 24.
5
Source memory that encoding was self-referential: the influence of stimulus characteristics.编码为自我参照的源记忆:刺激特征的影响。
Memory. 2017 Oct;25(9):1191-1200. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2017.1282517. Epub 2017 Feb 8.
6
Knowing me, knowing you: Resting-state functional connectivity of ventromedial prefrontal cortex dissociates memory related to self from a familiar other.了解自己,了解他人:腹内侧前额叶皮层的静息态功能连接将与自我相关的记忆与熟悉的他人区分开来。
Brain Cogn. 2017 Apr;113:65-75. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2017.01.004. Epub 2017 Feb 1.
7
The neural and computational bases of semantic cognition.语义认知的神经和计算基础。
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2017 Jan;18(1):42-55. doi: 10.1038/nrn.2016.150. Epub 2016 Nov 24.
8
The self-reference effect in dementia: Differential involvement of cortical midline structures in Alzheimer's disease and behavioural-variant frontotemporal dementia.痴呆症中的自我参照效应:阿尔茨海默病和行为变异型额颞叶痴呆中皮质中线结构的不同参与情况。
Cortex. 2017 Jun;91:169-185. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2016.09.013. Epub 2016 Oct 3.
9
The Integrative Self: How Self-Reference Integrates Perception and Memory.整体自我:自我参照如何整合感知和记忆。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2015 Dec;19(12):719-728. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2015.08.015. Epub 2015 Oct 4.
10
Retrieval induces adaptive forgetting of competing memories via cortical pattern suppression.检索通过皮层模式抑制诱导对竞争性记忆的适应性遗忘。
Nat Neurosci. 2015 Apr;18(4):582-9. doi: 10.1038/nn.3973. Epub 2015 Mar 16.