• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

动机性语义控制:探索外在奖励和自我参照对语义性失语症患者语义检索的影响。

Motivated semantic control: Exploring the effects of extrinsic reward and self-reference on semantic retrieval in semantic aphasia.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of York, UK.

Laboratory of Neuroimaging and Innovative Molecular Tracers (NIMTlab), Faculty of Medicine, Geneva University Neurocenter, University of Geneva, Switzerland.

出版信息

J Neuropsychol. 2022 Jun;16(2):407-433. doi: 10.1111/jnp.12272. Epub 2022 Jan 11.

DOI:10.1111/jnp.12272
PMID:35014758
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9306664/
Abstract

Recent insights show that increased motivation can benefit executive control, but this effect has not been explored in relation to semantic cognition. Patients with deficits of controlled semantic retrieval in the context of semantic aphasia (SA) after stroke may benefit from this approach since 'semantic control' is considered an executive process. Deficits in this domain are partially distinct from the domain-general deficits of cognitive control. We assessed the effect of both extrinsic and intrinsic motivation in healthy controls and SA patients. Experiment 1 manipulated extrinsic reward using high or low levels of points for correct responses during a semantic association task. Experiment 2 manipulated the intrinsic value of items using self-reference, allocating pictures of items to the participant ('self') or researcher ('other') in a shopping game before participants retrieved their semantic associations. These experiments revealed that patients, but not controls, showed better performance when given an extrinsic reward, consistent with the view that increased external motivation may help ameliorate patients' semantic control deficits. However, while self-reference was associated with better episodic memory, there was no effect on semantic retrieval. We conclude that semantic control deficits can be reduced when extrinsic rewards are anticipated; this enhanced motivational state is expected to support proactive control, for example, through the maintenance of task representations. It may be possible to harness this modulatory impact of reward to combat the control demands of semantic tasks in SA patients.

摘要

最近的研究表明,增加动机可以有益于执行控制,但这种效应在语义认知方面尚未得到探索。在中风后语义失语症(SA)患者中,由于“语义控制”被认为是一种执行过程,因此控制语义检索的缺陷可能会受益于这种方法。该领域的缺陷与认知控制的一般领域缺陷部分不同。我们评估了外在动机和内在动机对健康对照组和 SA 患者的影响。实验 1 通过在语义联想任务中使用正确反应的高低分来操纵外在奖励。实验 2 通过使用自我参照来操纵项目的内在价值,在参与者检索语义联想之前,将项目的图片分配给参与者(“自我”)或研究人员(“他人”)。这些实验表明,患者而非对照组在给予外在奖励时表现更好,这与增加外部动机可能有助于改善患者的语义控制缺陷的观点一致。然而,虽然自我参照与更好的情景记忆有关,但对语义检索没有影响。我们得出结论,当预期外在奖励时,语义控制缺陷可以减少;这种增强的动机状态有望支持主动控制,例如通过保持任务表示。有可能利用奖励的这种调节作用来对抗 SA 患者语义任务的控制需求。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/441e/9306664/722c641e0c28/JNP-16-407-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/441e/9306664/6764f30c2299/JNP-16-407-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/441e/9306664/911c292f7ceb/JNP-16-407-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/441e/9306664/ff0e66409a14/JNP-16-407-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/441e/9306664/dfb706c42026/JNP-16-407-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/441e/9306664/722c641e0c28/JNP-16-407-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/441e/9306664/6764f30c2299/JNP-16-407-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/441e/9306664/911c292f7ceb/JNP-16-407-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/441e/9306664/ff0e66409a14/JNP-16-407-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/441e/9306664/dfb706c42026/JNP-16-407-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/441e/9306664/722c641e0c28/JNP-16-407-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Motivated semantic control: Exploring the effects of extrinsic reward and self-reference on semantic retrieval in semantic aphasia.动机性语义控制:探索外在奖励和自我参照对语义性失语症患者语义检索的影响。
J Neuropsychol. 2022 Jun;16(2):407-433. doi: 10.1111/jnp.12272. Epub 2022 Jan 11.
2
The contribution of executive control to semantic cognition: Convergent evidence from semantic aphasia and executive dysfunction.执行控制对语义认知的作用:来自语义性失语症和执行功能障碍的聚合证据。
J Neuropsychol. 2018 Jun;12(2):312-340. doi: 10.1111/jnp.12142. Epub 2018 Jan 3.
3
Evaluating the distinction between semantic knowledge and semantic access: Evidence from semantic dementia and comprehension-impaired stroke aphasia.评估语义知识和语义访问之间的区别:来自语义痴呆和理解障碍性中风失语症的证据。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2020 Aug;27(4):607-639. doi: 10.3758/s13423-019-01706-6.
4
Semantic control deficits impair understanding of thematic relationships more than object identity.语义控制缺陷对主题关系的理解障碍甚于对物体身份的理解障碍。
Neuropsychologia. 2017 Sep;104:113-125. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.08.013. Epub 2017 Aug 11.
5
Consistently inconsistent: Multimodal episodic deficits in semantic aphasia.始终不一致:语义性失语症中的多模式发作性缺陷。
Neuropsychologia. 2020 Mar 16;140:107392. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2020.107392. Epub 2020 Feb 13.
6
Verbal fluency difficulties in aphasia: A combination of lexical and executive control deficits.失语症中的言语流畅性障碍:词汇和执行控制缺陷的组合。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2022 May;57(3):593-614. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12710. Epub 2022 Mar 23.
7
Different impairments of semantic cognition in semantic dementia and semantic aphasia: evidence from the non-verbal domain.语义性痴呆和语义性失语中语义认知的不同损伤:来自非言语领域的证据。
Brain. 2009 Sep;132(Pt 9):2593-608. doi: 10.1093/brain/awp146. Epub 2009 Jun 8.
8
Deregulated semantic cognition contributes to object-use deficits in Alzheimer's disease: A comparison with semantic aphasia and semantic dementia.语义认知失调导致阿尔茨海默病中的物体使用缺陷:与语义性失语症和语义性痴呆的比较。
J Neuropsychol. 2015 Sep;9(2):219-41. doi: 10.1111/jnp.12047. Epub 2014 Jun 9.
9
Training flexible conceptual retrieval in post-stroke aphasia.训练脑卒中后失语症患者的灵活概念检索能力。
Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2022 Aug;32(7):1429-1455. doi: 10.1080/09602011.2021.1895847. Epub 2021 Mar 14.
10
Semantic control and modality: an input processing deficit in aphasia leading to deregulated semantic cognition in a single modality.语义控制与模态:失语症中的输入加工缺陷导致单一模态下的语义认知失调。
Neuropsychologia. 2013 Aug;51(10):1998-2015. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.06.030. Epub 2013 Jul 10.

本文引用的文献

1
Mapping lesion, structural disconnection, and functional disconnection to symptoms in semantic aphasia.将病变、结构连接中断和功能连接中断与语义性失语症的症状相关联。
Brain Struct Funct. 2022 Dec;227(9):3043-3061. doi: 10.1007/s00429-022-02526-6. Epub 2022 Jul 4.
2
Impaired emotion perception and categorization in semantic aphasia.语义性失语症患者的情绪知觉和分类受损。
Neuropsychologia. 2021 Nov 12;162:108052. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2021.108052. Epub 2021 Oct 12.
3
Distinct and common neural coding of semantic and non-semantic control demands.
语义和非语义控制需求的独特和共同神经编码。
Neuroimage. 2021 Aug 1;236:118230. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118230. Epub 2021 Jun 2.
4
The neural correlates of semantic control revisited.重新探讨语义控制的神经关联。
Neuroimage. 2021 Jan 1;224:117444. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117444. Epub 2020 Oct 12.
5
Knowing what you need to know in advance: The neural processes underpinning flexible semantic retrieval of thematic and taxonomic relations.提前了解所需知识:支持主题和分类关系灵活语义检索的神经过程。
Neuroimage. 2021 Jan 1;224:117405. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117405. Epub 2020 Sep 28.
6
A gradient from long-term memory to novel cognition: Transitions through default mode and executive cortex.从长期记忆到新颖认知的渐变:通过默认模式和执行皮层的转变。
Neuroimage. 2020 Oct 15;220:117074. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117074. Epub 2020 Jun 20.
7
Evaluating the distinction between semantic knowledge and semantic access: Evidence from semantic dementia and comprehension-impaired stroke aphasia.评估语义知识和语义访问之间的区别:来自语义痴呆和理解障碍性中风失语症的证据。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2020 Aug;27(4):607-639. doi: 10.3758/s13423-019-01706-6.
8
The neurocognitive basis of knowledge about object identity and events: dissociations reflect opposing effects of semantic coherence and control.关于物体身份和事件的知识的神经认知基础:分离反映了语义连贯性和控制的相反影响。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2020 Feb 3;375(1791):20190300. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2019.0300. Epub 2019 Dec 16.
9
Executive control in frontal lesion aphasia: Does verbal load matter?额叶损伤性失语症中的执行控制:言语负荷是否重要?
Neuropsychologia. 2019 Oct;133:107178. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2019.107178. Epub 2019 Aug 29.
10
Progressive Recruitment of the Frontoparietal Multiple-demand System with Increased Task Complexity, Time Pressure, and Reward.随着任务复杂性、时间压力和奖励的增加,额顶多需求系统的渐进式招募。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2019 Nov;31(11):1617-1630. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_01440. Epub 2019 Jul 5.