Hüve Katja, Bichele Irina, Kaldmäe Hedi, Rasulov Bahtijor, Valladares Fernando, Niinemets Ülo
Institute of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Estonian University of Life Sciences, Kreutzwaldi 1, 51006 Tartu, Estonia.
Institute of Physics, University of Tartu, W. Ostwaldi 1, 50411 Tartu, Estonia.
Plants (Basel). 2019 May 30;8(6):145. doi: 10.3390/plants8060145.
During exposure to direct sunlight, leaf temperature increases rapidly and can reach values well above air temperature in temperate forest understories, especially when transpiration is limited due to drought stress, but the physiological effects of such high-temperature events are imperfectly understood. To gain insight into leaf temperature changes in the field and the effects of temperature variation on plant photosynthetic processes, we studied leaf temperature dynamics under field conditions in European aspen ( L.) and under nursery conditions in hybrid aspen ( × Michaux), and further investigated the heat response of photosynthetic activity in hybrid aspen leaves under laboratory conditions. To simulate the complex fluctuating temperature environment in the field, intact, attached leaves were subjected to short temperature increases ("heat pulses") of varying duration over the temperature range of 30 °C-53 °C either under constant light intensity or by simultaneously raising the light intensity from 600 μmol m s to 1000 μmol m s during the heat pulse. On a warm summer day, leaf temperatures of up to 44 °C were measured in aspen leaves growing in the hemiboreal climate of Estonia. Laboratory experiments demonstrated that a moderate heat pulse of 2 min and up to 44 °C resulted in a reversible decrease of photosynthesis. The decrease in photosynthesis resulted from a combination of suppression of photosynthesis directly caused by the heat pulse and a further decrease, for a time period of 10-40 min after the heat pulse, caused by subsequent transient stomatal closure and delayed recovery of photosystem II (PSII) quantum yield. Longer and hotter heat pulses resulted in sustained inhibition of photosynthesis, primarily due to reduced PSII activity. However, cellular damage as indicated by increased membrane conductivity was not found below 50 °C. These data demonstrate that aspen is remarkably resistant to short-term heat pulses that are frequent under strongly fluctuating light regimes. Although the heat pulses did not result in cellular damage, heatflecks can significantly reduce the whole plant carbon gain in the field due to the delayed photosynthetic recovery after the heat pulse.
在直接暴露于阳光期间,叶片温度迅速升高,在温带森林林下,叶片温度能达到远高于气温的值,尤其是在干旱胁迫导致蒸腾作用受限的情况下。然而,此类高温事件的生理影响尚未完全明晰。为深入了解田间叶片温度变化以及温度变化对植物光合过程的影响,我们研究了欧洲山杨(Populus tremula L.)田间条件下以及杂种山杨(Populus tremula × Populus tremuloides Michaux)苗圃条件下的叶片温度动态,并在实验室条件下进一步研究了杂种山杨叶片光合活性的热响应。为模拟田间复杂的波动温度环境,完整的、附着的叶片在30℃至53℃温度范围内接受不同持续时间的短时间温度升高(“热脉冲”),实验条件为恒定光强,或在热脉冲期间将光强从600 μmol m⁻² s⁻¹ 同时提高到1000 μmol m⁻² s⁻¹ 。在爱沙尼亚半寒带气候下生长的山杨叶片上,在一个温暖的夏日测量到叶片温度高达44℃。实验室实验表明,持续2分钟、温度高达44℃的适度热脉冲会导致光合作用可逆下降。光合作用的下降是由热脉冲直接导致的光合作用抑制以及热脉冲后10 - 40分钟内,随后的短暂气孔关闭和光合系统II(PSII)量子产率延迟恢复导致的进一步下降共同作用的结果。更长时间、更热的热脉冲会导致光合作用持续受到抑制,主要原因是PSII活性降低。然而,在50℃以下未发现膜导电性增加所表明的细胞损伤。这些数据表明,山杨对强光波动下频繁出现的短期热脉冲具有显著抗性。尽管热脉冲未导致细胞损伤,但热斑由于热脉冲后光合恢复延迟,会显著降低田间整株植物的碳积累。