Lancia Carlo, Anninga Jakob, Spitoni Cristian, Sydes Matthew R, Whelan Jeremy, Hogendoorn Pancras C W, Gelderblom Hans, Fiocco Marta
Mathematical Institute, Universiteit Leiden, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Department Solid Tumors, Princess Maxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
BMJ Open. 2019 May 30;9(5):e022980. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022980.
In cancer studies, the target received dose intensity (tRDI) for any regimen, the intended dose and time for the regimen, is commonly taken as a proxy for achieved RDI (aRDI), the actual individual dose and time for the regimen. Evaluating tRDI/aRDI mismatches is crucial to assess study results whenever patients are stratified on allocated regimen. The manuscript develops a novel methodology to highlight and evaluate tRDI/aRDI mismatches.
Retrospective analysis of a randomised controlled trial, MRC BO06 (EORTC 80931).
Population-based study but proposed methodology can be applied to other trial designs.
A total of 497 patients with resectable high-grade osteosarcoma, of which 19 were excluded because chemotherapy was not started or the estimated dose was abnormally high (>1.25 × prescribed dose).
Two regimens with the same anticipated cumulative dose (doxorubicin 6×75 mg/m/week; cisplatin 6×100 mg/m/week) over different time schedules: every 3 weeks in regimen-C and every 2 weeks in regimen-DI. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: tRDI distribution was measured across groups of patients derived from k-means clustering of treatment data. K-means creates groups of patients who are aRDI-homogeneous. The main outcome is the proportion of tRDI values in groups of homogeneous aRDI.
For nearly half of the patients, there is a mismatch between tRDI and aRDI; for 21%, aRDI was closer to the tRDI of the other regimen.
For MRC BO06, tRDI did not predict well aRDI. The manuscript offers an original procedure to highlight the presence of and quantify tRDI/aRDI mismatches. Caution is required to interpret the effect of chemotherapy-regimen intensification on survival outcome at an individual level where such a mismatch is present.The study relevance lies in the use of individual realisation of the intended treatment, which depends on individual delays and/or dose reductions reported throughout the treatment.
ISRCTN86294690.
在癌症研究中,任何治疗方案的目标接受剂量强度(tRDI),即该方案的预期剂量和时间,通常被用作已实现剂量强度(aRDI)的替代指标,aRDI是该方案实际的个体剂量和时间。每当患者根据分配的治疗方案进行分层时,评估tRDI/aRDI不匹配对于评估研究结果至关重要。本文提出了一种新方法来突出和评估tRDI/aRDI不匹配。
对一项随机对照试验MRC BO06(EORTC 80931)进行回顾性分析。
基于人群的研究,但所提出的方法可应用于其他试验设计。
共有497例可切除的高级别骨肉瘤患者,其中19例被排除,原因是未开始化疗或估计剂量异常高(>规定剂量的1.25倍)。
两种方案,预期累积剂量相同(多柔比星6×75mg/m²/周;顺铂6×100mg/m²/周),但时间安排不同:方案C每3周一次,方案DI每2周一次。
通过对治疗数据进行k均值聚类得到的患者组来测量tRDI分布。k均值聚类创建了aRDI同质的患者组。主要观察指标是同质aRDI组中tRDI值的比例。
近一半的患者,tRDI与aRDI不匹配;21%的患者,aRDI更接近另一种方案的tRDI。
对于MRC BO06,tRDI不能很好地预测aRDI。本文提供了一种原创程序来突出tRDI/aRDI不匹配的存在并对其进行量化。在存在这种不匹配的个体水平上,解释化疗方案强化对生存结果的影响时需要谨慎。该研究的意义在于使用预期治疗的个体实现情况,这取决于整个治疗过程中报告的个体延迟和/或剂量减少情况。
ISRCTN86294690。