Gorski Jillian, Goldstein Seth, Zeineddin Suhail, Ramgopal Sriram
Division of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin.
Department of Surgery, Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois.
J Surg Res. 2025 Feb;306:68-76. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2024.12.008. Epub 2025 Jan 2.
Undertriage of children contributes to poorer clinical outcomes. The objective of this study was to determine factors associated with undertriage of pediatric major trauma victims.
We performed a retrospective cross-sectional study of children (aged < 16 ys) using the 2021 American College of Surgeons National Trauma Data Bank. We identified children who met the definition of major trauma defined by the Standard Triage Assessment Tool. We performed multivariable logistic regression to determine factors associated with undertriage, defined as encounters which met criteria, but did not receive highest-level activation.
Of 97,812 included children, 5.3% met major trauma criteria. Undertriage occurred in 34.4% of encounters with major trauma. Factors associated with undertriage included fall and striking mechanisms, missing blood pressure, private vehicle arrival, and incoming interfacility transfers. Hypotension, decreased level of consciousness, prehospital and in-hospital intubation, tachycardia, hypothermia, penetrating mechanism, presentation to a pediatric level 2 or adult level 1 trauma center relative to pediatric level 1 center, and arrival by flight were associated with lower odds of undertriage.
Many children with major trauma were undertriaged, particularly those presenting with lower-risk histories, such as private vehicle arrivals and fall mechanisms. Future work should seek to develop risk-stratification systems that can better identify children with major trauma, with an emphasis on those with blunt traumatic mechanisms.
儿童分诊不足会导致临床结局较差。本研究的目的是确定与儿科严重创伤受害者分诊不足相关的因素。
我们使用2021年美国外科医师学会国家创伤数据库对16岁以下儿童进行了一项回顾性横断面研究。我们确定了符合标准分诊评估工具定义的严重创伤儿童。我们进行了多变量逻辑回归分析,以确定与分诊不足相关的因素,分诊不足定义为符合标准但未接受最高级别激活的病例。
在纳入研究的97812名儿童中,5.3%符合严重创伤标准。在34.4%的严重创伤病例中发生了分诊不足。与分诊不足相关的因素包括跌倒和撞击机制、血压缺失、私家车送达以及院间转运入院。低血压、意识水平下降、院前和院内插管、心动过速、体温过低、穿透性机制、相对于儿科1级中心而言在儿科2级或成人1级创伤中心就诊以及乘飞机抵达与较低的分诊不足几率相关。
许多严重创伤儿童存在分诊不足的情况,尤其是那些有较低风险病史的儿童,如私家车送达和跌倒机制。未来的工作应致力于开发能够更好识别严重创伤儿童的风险分层系统,重点关注那些有钝性创伤机制的儿童。