• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

癌症控制状况和急性生理学与慢性健康状况评分系统 II 是癌症合并脓毒症危重症患者的预后因素。

The cancer control status and APACHE II score are prognostic factors for critically ill patients with cancer and sepsis.

机构信息

Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Keelung, Taiwan, ROC.

Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Keelung, Taiwan, ROC; Chang Gung University, College of Medicine, Taoyuan, Taiwan, ROC.

出版信息

J Formos Med Assoc. 2020 Jan;119(1 Pt 2):276-281. doi: 10.1016/j.jfma.2019.05.012. Epub 2019 May 30.

DOI:10.1016/j.jfma.2019.05.012
PMID:31153724
Abstract

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Patients with cancer are eligible for hospice care when their life expectancy is 180 days or shorter. This study investigated the prognostic factors of patients with cancer and sepsis who were admitted to an intensive care unit (ICU) to assist with clinical decisions of hospice care.

METHODS

A series of 279 patients admitted to the medical ICU with cancer and sepsis were included. Another series of 109 patients with cancer and sepsis admitted to the other medical ICU in the different branch of our hospital was included to verify the results.

RESULTS

Among 279 patients, the 30-, 90-, and 180-day mortality rates were 47.3%, 72.0%, and 81.0%, respectively. APACHE II score and the cancer control status (controlled or remission (CR), active newly diagnosed (AND) and active recurrent or progressive (ARP)) were significant predictors of 30- and 90-day mortality(30-day: AND(odds ratio: 5.66; 95% confidence interval: 2.12-15.15), ARP(6.24; 2.92-13.33), APACHE II( 1.07; 1.03-1.11); 90-day: AND(4.78; 1.91-11.99), ARP( 24.03; 11.11-51.99), APACHE II( 1.07; 1.02-1.19)) and were associated with a poor 180-day outcome. The 180-day mortality were significantly different among the patients with different cancer control status in the series of 279 patients (CR: 29.8%; AND: 69.4%; and ARP: 98.9 %) and that of 109 patients (46.4%; 96.8%; and 94.0%).

CONCLUSION

APACHE II score and the cancer control status may be the prognostic factors for critically ill patients with cancer and sepsis, and they may be helpful for evaluating hospice care.

摘要

背景/目的:当癌症患者的预期寿命为 180 天或更短时,他们有资格接受临终关怀。本研究旨在探讨入住重症监护病房(ICU)的癌症合并脓毒症患者的预后因素,以协助临床做出临终关怀决策。

方法

纳入了 279 例因癌症合并脓毒症入住我院内科 ICU 的患者。另外纳入了 109 例因癌症合并脓毒症入住我院其他内科 ICU 的患者作为验证队列。

结果

在 279 例患者中,30 天、90 天和 180 天的死亡率分别为 47.3%、72.0%和 81.0%。急性生理与慢性健康状况评分 II(APACHE II)和癌症控制状况(控制或缓解(CR)、新发活动(AND)和复发或进展性活动(ARP))是 30 天和 90 天死亡率的显著预测因素(30 天:AND(比值比:5.66;95%置信区间:2.12-15.15),ARP(6.24;2.92-13.33),APACHE II(1.07;1.03-1.11);90 天:AND(4.78;1.91-11.99),ARP(24.03;11.11-51.99),APACHE II(1.07;1.02-1.19)),且与 180 天预后不良相关。在 279 例患者中,不同癌症控制状况患者的 180 天死亡率差异有统计学意义(CR:29.8%;AND:69.4%;ARP:98.9%),在 109 例患者中,差异也有统计学意义(CR:46.4%;AND:96.8%;ARP:94.0%)。

结论

APACHE II 评分和癌症控制状况可能是癌症合并脓毒症重症患者的预后因素,有助于评估临终关怀。

相似文献

1
The cancer control status and APACHE II score are prognostic factors for critically ill patients with cancer and sepsis.癌症控制状况和急性生理学与慢性健康状况评分系统 II 是癌症合并脓毒症危重症患者的预后因素。
J Formos Med Assoc. 2020 Jan;119(1 Pt 2):276-281. doi: 10.1016/j.jfma.2019.05.012. Epub 2019 May 30.
2
Prognostic factors in critically ill cancer patients admitted to the intensive care unit.入住重症监护病房的危重症癌症患者的预后因素。
J Crit Care. 2014 Aug;29(4):618-26. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2014.01.014. Epub 2014 Jan 29.
3
[The prognostic value of serum procalcitonin on severity of illness in non-sepsis critically ill patients].[血清降钙素原对非脓毒症危重症患者病情严重程度的预后价值]
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2016 Aug;28(8):688-93. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-4352.2016.08.004.
4
Predictors of short-term mortality in critically ill patients with solid malignancies.实体恶性肿瘤重症患者短期死亡率的预测因素。
Intensive Care Med. 2000 Dec;26(12):1817-23. doi: 10.1007/s001340051350.
5
Circulating levels of GH predict mortality and complement prognostic scores in critically ill medical patients.生长激素的循环水平可预测危重症内科患者的死亡率并完善预后评分。
Eur J Endocrinol. 2009 Feb;160(2):157-63. doi: 10.1530/EJE-08-0786. Epub 2008 Nov 20.
6
Lactate indices as predictors of in-hospital mortality or 90-day survival after admission to an intensive care unit in unselected critically ill patients.在未选择的危重症患者入住重症监护病房后,乳酸指数作为住院死亡率或 90 天生存率的预测指标。
PLoS One. 2020 Mar 9;15(3):e0229135. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0229135. eCollection 2020.
7
Prognostic factors in critically ill patients with solid tumours admitted to an oncological intensive care unit.入住肿瘤重症监护病房的实体瘤重症患者的预后因素。
Anaesth Intensive Care. 2010 Mar;38(2):317-24. doi: 10.1177/0310057X1003800214.
8
Short-term and medium-term survival of critically ill patients with solid tumours admitted to the intensive care unit: a retrospective analysis.入住重症监护病房的实体瘤重症患者的短期和中期生存情况:一项回顾性分析。
BMJ Open. 2016 Oct 18;6(10):e011363. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011363.
9
Outcome and prognostic factors in critically ill cancer patients admitted to the intensive care unit.入住重症监护病房的重症癌症患者的结局及预后因素
Crit Care Med. 2000 May;28(5):1322-8. doi: 10.1097/00003246-200005000-00011.
10
Outcomes of critically ill gynecological cancer patients admitted to intensive care unit.入住重症监护病房的妇科危重症癌症患者的治疗结果。
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2013 Feb;30(1):7-11. doi: 10.1177/1049909112437028. Epub 2012 Feb 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Going Beyond the Do-Not-Resuscitate Order: Comparing the Care Received by Cancer Patients with Respect to Hospice Care Needs.超越“不要复苏”医嘱:比较癌症患者在临终关怀需求方面所接受的护理。
Indian J Palliat Care. 2025 Apr-Jun;31(2):159-166. doi: 10.25259/IJPC_241_2024. Epub 2025 Apr 23.
2
Risk factors analysis of 90-day mortality in patients with sepsis in intensive care unit.重症监护病房脓毒症患者90天死亡率的危险因素分析
PLoS One. 2025 Jun 20;20(6):e0325813. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0325813. eCollection 2025.
3
Evaluation of prognostic factors for mortality in cancer patients with sepsis in the intensive care unit: systematic review protocol.
重症监护病房中癌症合并脓毒症患者死亡率的预后因素评估:系统评价方案
Crit Care Sci. 2025 May 2;37:e20250283. doi: 10.62675/2965-2774.20250283. eCollection 2025.
4
Development and validation of a prediction model for in-hospital mortality in patients with sepsis.脓毒症患者院内死亡率预测模型的开发与验证
Nurs Crit Care. 2025 May;30(3):e70015. doi: 10.1111/nicc.70015.
5
Survival of Patients with Solid Tumours and Sepsis Admitted to Intensive Care in a Tertiary Oncology Centre: A Retrospective Analysis.三级肿瘤中心重症监护病房收治的实体瘤合并脓毒症患者的生存情况:一项回顾性分析
J Intensive Care Med. 2025 Jun;40(6):642-650. doi: 10.1177/08850666241312621. Epub 2025 Jan 28.
6
Predictive Value of SYN-1 Levels for Mortality in Sepsis Patients in the Emergency Department.急诊科脓毒症患者中SYN-1水平对死亡率的预测价值
J Inflamm Res. 2024 Nov 26;17:9837-9846. doi: 10.2147/JIR.S468763. eCollection 2024.
7
Investigating stress, social support, and decisional conflict dynamics in surrogates of intensive care unit patients with cancer.调查癌症重症监护病房患者的代理人的压力、社会支持和决策冲突动态。
Support Care Cancer. 2024 Oct 11;32(11):722. doi: 10.1007/s00520-024-08916-2.
8
Outcome of Cancer Patients with an Unplanned Intensive Care Unit Admission: Predictors of Mortality and Long-term Survival.非计划入住重症监护病房的癌症患者的结局:死亡率和长期生存的预测因素
Saudi J Med Med Sci. 2024 Apr-Jun;12(2):153-161. doi: 10.4103/sjmms.sjmms_145_23. Epub 2024 Apr 5.
9
A simplified machine learning model utilizing platelet-related genes for predicting poor prognosis in sepsis.利用血小板相关基因的简化机器学习模型预测脓毒症不良预后。
Front Immunol. 2023 Nov 20;14:1286203. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1286203. eCollection 2023.
10
Prediction of survival time after terminal extubation: the balance between critical care unit utilization and hospice medicine in the COVID-19 pandemic era.新冠肺炎大流行时期,预测终末期拔管后的生存时间:重症监护病房利用与临终关怀医学之间的平衡。
Eur J Med Res. 2023 Jan 11;28(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s40001-022-00972-w.