• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

β-Angles of hips with femoroacetabular impingement versus asymptomatic normal hips in a Japanese population: A CT-based observational clinical study.

作者信息

Mimura Tomohiro, Mori Kanji, Okumura Noriaki, Kumagai Kosuke, Maeda Tsutomu, Kagei Yusuke, Yayama Takafumi, Imai Shinji

机构信息

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Shiga University of Medical Science, Shiga 520-2192, Japan.

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Shiga University of Medical Science, Shiga 520-2192, Japan.

出版信息

J Orthop Sci. 2020 Mar;25(2):261-266. doi: 10.1016/j.jos.2019.04.011. Epub 2019 May 29.

DOI:10.1016/j.jos.2019.04.011
PMID:31153739
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The beta angle (β-angle)-although used to assess femoroacetabular impingement (FAI)-has not been well evaluated. This study aimed to measure the β-angle on multiradial computed tomography (CT) slice images of both hips with symptomatic FAI and asymptomatic normal hips to determine its optimal cutoff value for detecting FAI in a Japanese population.

METHODS

CT was performed with each subject supine. The β-angle was measured on seven radial slices (designated R0, R15, R30, R45, R60, R75, R90) that were generated at 15° intervals from the oblique axial slice through the center of the femoral neck. An a priori power analysis was performed. The measurements were made in 20 FAI hips (FAI group) and 23 asymptomatic normal hips (ANH group). Cutoff values were evaluated using receiver operating characteristic curves.

RESULTS

The mean β-angles of the FAI and ANH groups at R0, R15, R30, R45, R60, R75, and R90° were, respectively, 73.6° and 84.2°, 66.0° and 79.3°, 57.2° and 69.2°, 48.1° and 63.1°, 46.7° and 62.5°, 50.0° and 63.7°, and 53.7° and 65.9°. For all slices, the β-angle was significantly smaller in the FAI group than the ANH group. The optimal β-angle cutoff values for diagnosing FAI at R0, R15, R30, R45, R60, R75, and R90 were 73.9°, 70.2°, 61.4°, 55.7°, 53.6°, 59.4°, and 60.9°, respectively. The respective specificities and sensitivities of the cutoff values at R0, R15, R30, R45, R60, R75, and R90 were 78.3% and 65.0%, 82.6% and 70.0%, 73.9% and 60.0%, 73.9% and 75.0%, 95.7% and 75.0%, 69.6% and 95.0%, and 78.3% and 80.0%.

CONCLUSIONS

In all radial slices, the β-angle was significantly smaller in the hips with symptomatic FAI than in the asymptomatic normal hips. The most useful cutoff value for diagnosing FAI was a β-angle of 53.6° at R60.

摘要

相似文献

1
β-Angles of hips with femoroacetabular impingement versus asymptomatic normal hips in a Japanese population: A CT-based observational clinical study.
J Orthop Sci. 2020 Mar;25(2):261-266. doi: 10.1016/j.jos.2019.04.011. Epub 2019 May 29.
2
Prevalence of radiological femoroacetabular impingement in Japanese hip joints: detailed investigation with computed tomography.日本髋关节放射学股骨髋臼撞击症的患病率:计算机断层扫描详细调查
J Orthop Sci. 2015 Jul;20(4):649-56. doi: 10.1007/s00776-015-0733-5. Epub 2015 May 12.
3
Femoroacetabular Impingement Patients With Decreased Femoral Version Have Different Impingement Locations and Intra- and Extraarticular Anterior Subspine FAI on 3D-CT-Based Impingement Simulation: Implications for Hip Arthroscopy.基于三维 CT 的撞击模拟中,股骨颈前倾角减小的髋关节撞击症患者撞击位置和关节内、外前支突撞击点不同:对髋关节镜手术的影响。
Am J Sports Med. 2019 Nov;47(13):3120-3132. doi: 10.1177/0363546519873666. Epub 2019 Sep 20.
4
Location of Intra- and Extra-articular Hip Impingement Is Different in Patients With Pincer-Type and Mixed-Type Femoroacetabular Impingement Due to Acetabular Retroversion or Protrusio Acetabuli on 3D CT-Based Impingement Simulation.基于 3D CT 的撞击模拟中,髋臼后倾或前突导致钳夹型和混合型股骨髋臼撞击症患者的关节内和关节外撞击位置不同。
Am J Sports Med. 2020 Mar;48(3):661-672. doi: 10.1177/0363546519897273. Epub 2020 Jan 21.
5
Anterior Inferior Iliac Spine Morphology: Comparison of Symptomatic Hips With Femoroacetabular Impingement and Asymptomatic Hips.髂前下棘形态学:髋关节撞击症与无症状髋关节的比较。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2019 Jan;212(1):166-172. doi: 10.2214/AJR.18.19655. Epub 2018 Nov 7.
6
Are "normal hips" being labeled as femoroacetabular impingement due to EE angle?“正常髋关节”会因髋臼外展角而被诊断为股骨髋臼撞击症吗?
Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Mar;96(13):e6410. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000006410.
7
Radiologic Correlation Between the Ischiofemoral Space and Morphologic Characteristics of the Hip in Hips With Symptoms of Dysplasia.影像学中坐骨股骨间距与髋关节形态特征在髋关节发育不良症状中的相关性。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2018 Mar;210(3):608-614. doi: 10.2214/AJR.17.18465. Epub 2018 Jan 30.
8
Quantifying differences in femoral head and neck asphericity in CAM type femoroacetabular impingement and hip dysplasia versus controls using radial 3DCT imaging and volumetric segmentation.采用径向 3DCT 成像和容积分割技术定量测量 CAM 型股骨髋臼撞击症和髋关节发育不良与对照组股骨头颈非球度的差异。
Br J Radiol. 2020 Jun;93(1110):20190039. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20190039. Epub 2020 Mar 18.
9
Femoroacetabular impingement: normal values of the quantitative morphometric parameters in asymptomatic hips.股骨髋臼撞击症:无症状髋关节定量形态学参数的正常值
Eur Radiol. 2014 Jul;24(7):1707-14. doi: 10.1007/s00330-014-3171-4. Epub 2014 Apr 27.
10
Characterization of symptomatic hip impingement in butterfly ice hockey goalies.蝶式冰球守门员有症状的髋关节撞击症的特征分析
Arthroscopy. 2015 Apr;31(4):635-42. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2014.10.010. Epub 2014 Dec 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Birmingham Royal Orthopedic Hospital (BROH) CAM Offset: A Simplified Metric for Detection of CAM Morphology of the Hip.伯明翰皇家骨科医院(BROH)凸轮偏移:一种检测髋关节凸轮形态的简化指标。
Indian J Radiol Imaging. 2025 Mar 27;35(4):568-572. doi: 10.1055/s-0045-1806747. eCollection 2025 Oct.
2
Anatomical Mechanisms of Femoroacetabular Impingement and Its Role in the Progression to Hip Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review.股骨髋臼撞击症的解剖学机制及其在髋关节骨关节炎进展中的作用:一项系统评价
Cureus. 2025 Jun 20;17(6):e86461. doi: 10.7759/cureus.86461. eCollection 2025 Jun.