• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社会生态学是否导致狼和狗在休息时的警觉性存在差异?

Does socio-ecology drive differences in alertness between wolves and dogs when resting?

作者信息

Kortekaas Kim, Kotrschal Kurt

机构信息

Department of Cognitive Biology, University of Vienna, Althanstrasse 14, 1090, Vienna, Austria; Department of Behavioural Biology, University of Vienna, Althanstrasse 14, 1090, Vienna, Austria; Wolf Science Center, Messerli Research Institute, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Veterinärplatz 1, 1210, Vienna, Austria.

Department of Behavioural Biology, University of Vienna, Althanstrasse 14, 1090, Vienna, Austria; Wolf Science Center, Messerli Research Institute, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Veterinärplatz 1, 1210, Vienna, Austria; Konrad Lorenz Research Station, Core Facility University of Vienna, Fischerau 11, 4645, Grünau im Almtal, Austria.

出版信息

Behav Processes. 2019 Sep;166:103877. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2019.05.024. Epub 2019 May 30.

DOI:10.1016/j.beproc.2019.05.024
PMID:31153928
Abstract

Variation in resting behaviour across animals may be driven by adaptations towards their environment. Wolves and dogs seem promising models to examine this idea as they share a common ancestor, but occupy different socio-ecological niches. While wolves generally avoid humans, hunt, defend their territory, and raise offspring cooperatively, most dogs live in human-shaped environments. Hence, we hypothesized wolves to be more alert towards their environment than dogs, i.e. the degree of activation along the sleep-wake continuum (alertness) should be greater in wolves than in dogs. We estimated alertness via cardiac output. We tested similarly raised and kept pack-living wolves and dogs in two different behavioural conditions: (1) inactive wakefulness: animal is lying, head in an upward position with eyes opened, (2) resting: animal is lying, head in downward position with eyes mainly closed. In contrast to our expectations, we found that in both conditions wolves had a lower heart rate and higher heart rate variability than dogs, i.e. wolves might be less alert/more relaxed than dogs. Although our results are preliminary, we suggest that the higher alertness of dogs compared to wolves is potentially driven by differences in their socio-ecology (i.e. domestication) causing greater attention of dogs to human behaviour.

摘要

动物休息行为的差异可能是由对其环境的适应性所驱动的。狼和狗似乎是检验这一观点的有前景的模型,因为它们有着共同的祖先,但占据着不同的社会生态位。狼通常会避开人类,进行狩猎、保卫领地并合作养育后代,而大多数狗生活在类人环境中。因此,我们假设狼比狗对环境更警觉,即狼在睡眠-觉醒连续体上的激活程度(警觉性)应高于狗。我们通过心输出量来估计警觉性。我们在两种不同的行为条件下对饲养方式和生活环境相似的群居狼和狗进行了测试:(1)非活动清醒状态:动物躺着,头向上,眼睛睁开;(2)休息状态:动物躺着,头向下,眼睛主要闭合。与我们的预期相反,我们发现,在这两种条件下,狼的心率都比狗低,心率变异性比狗高,即狼可能比狗更不警觉/更放松。尽管我们的结果是初步的,但我们认为,狗比狼更高的警觉性可能是由它们社会生态(即驯化)的差异所驱动的,这种差异导致狗对人类行为的关注度更高。

相似文献

1
Does socio-ecology drive differences in alertness between wolves and dogs when resting?社会生态学是否导致狼和狗在休息时的警觉性存在差异?
Behav Processes. 2019 Sep;166:103877. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2019.05.024. Epub 2019 May 30.
2
Social Context Influences Resting Physiology in Dogs.社会环境影响犬类的静息生理状态。
Animals (Basel). 2020 Nov 26;10(12):2214. doi: 10.3390/ani10122214.
3
Context-Specific Arousal During Resting in Wolves and Dogs: Effects of Domestication?狼和狗休息时的特定情境唤醒:驯化的影响?
Front Psychol. 2020 Nov 24;11:568199. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.568199. eCollection 2020.
4
Domestication Does Not Explain the Presence of Inequity Aversion in Dogs.家犬对不公平的反感并非源于驯化。
Curr Biol. 2017 Jun 19;27(12):1861-1865.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2017.05.061. Epub 2017 Jun 8.
5
Food preferences of similarly raised and kept captive dogs and wolves.圈养和饲养条件相同的狗和狼的食物偏好。
PLoS One. 2018 Sep 20;13(9):e0203165. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0203165. eCollection 2018.
6
"Wolves (Canis lupus) and dogs (Canis familiaris) differ in following human gaze into distant space but respond similar to their packmates' gaze": Correction to Werhahn et al. (2016).“狼(犬属灰狼种)和狗(犬属家犬种)在跟随人类目光看向远处空间方面存在差异,但对其同伴目光的反应相似”:对韦尔哈恩等人(2016年)研究的修正
J Comp Psychol. 2017 Feb;131(1):49. doi: 10.1037/com0000056.
7
Wolves, but not dogs, are prosocial in a touch screen task.狼,而不是狗,在触摸屏任务中具有亲社会行为。
PLoS One. 2019 May 1;14(5):e0215444. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0215444. eCollection 2019.
8
Wolves (Canis lupus) and dogs (Canis familiaris) differ in following human gaze into distant space but respond similar to their packmates' gaze.狼(犬属灰狼种)和狗(犬属家犬种)在跟随人类目光看向远处空间方面存在差异,但对其同伴的目光反应相似。
J Comp Psychol. 2016 Aug;130(3):288-98. doi: 10.1037/com0000036. Epub 2016 May 30.
9
Evolution of facial muscle anatomy in dogs.狗面部肌肉解剖结构的演变。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Jul 16;116(29):14677-14681. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1820653116. Epub 2019 Jun 17.
10
Endocrine changes related to dog domestication: Comparing urinary cortisol and oxytocin in hand-raised, pack-living dogs and wolves.与犬类驯化相关的内分泌变化:对比人工饲养群居的犬类和狼的尿液皮质醇和催产素。
Horm Behav. 2021 Feb;128:104901. doi: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2020.104901. Epub 2020 Nov 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Decreased risk-proneness with increasing age in equally raised and kept wolves and dogs.在同等饲养条件下,狼和狗随着年龄增长风险倾向降低。
PLoS One. 2025 Jan 8;20(1):e0313916. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0313916. eCollection 2025.
2
Non-invasive sleep EEG measurement in hand raised wolves.手养狼的非侵入性睡眠 EEG 测量。
Sci Rep. 2022 Jun 13;12(1):9792. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-13643-x.
3
'Puppy Dog Eyes' Are Associated With Eye Movements, Not Communication.“小狗般的眼神”与眼部运动有关,而非交流。
Front Psychol. 2021 Feb 17;12:568935. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.568935. eCollection 2021.
4
Context-Specific Arousal During Resting in Wolves and Dogs: Effects of Domestication?狼和狗休息时的特定情境唤醒:驯化的影响?
Front Psychol. 2020 Nov 24;11:568199. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.568199. eCollection 2020.
5
Social Context Influences Resting Physiology in Dogs.社会环境影响犬类的静息生理状态。
Animals (Basel). 2020 Nov 26;10(12):2214. doi: 10.3390/ani10122214.