• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在同等饲养条件下,狼和狗随着年龄增长风险倾向降低。

Decreased risk-proneness with increasing age in equally raised and kept wolves and dogs.

作者信息

Jean-Joseph Hillary, Kortekaas Kim, Range Friederike, Kotrschal Kurt

机构信息

Department of Behavioural and Cognitive Biology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

Domestication Lab, University of Veterinary Medicine, Vienna, Medical University of Vienna, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2025 Jan 8;20(1):e0313916. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0313916. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0313916
PMID:39775357
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11709314/
Abstract

A basic mechanism of domestication is the selection for fearlessness and acceptance of humans as social partners, which may affect risk-taking behavior and the ability to use humans as social support, both at the behavioural and physiological levels. We combined behavioural observations with heart rate parameters (i.e., HR and heart rate variability, HRV) in equally raised and housed wolves and dogs to assess the responses to food offered in the vicinity of a potential stressor (an unknown spinning object) with and without social support from a familiar human. Based on previous studies on neophobia in wolves and dogs, we expected dogs to be less scared of the object, approach more quickly, show less ambivalent behaviour, lower HR, and higher HRV, than wolves, especially at the presence of a human partner. However, we found that mainly age and the presence of a familiar human affected the behaviour of our subjects: older wolves and dogs were generally bolder and faster to approach the food and the familiar human's presence increased the likelihood of taking it. HR rate parameters were affected by age and the stage of the test. Wolves and dogs showed particularly high HRs at the beginning and end of the test sessions. We conclude that in our paradigm, wolves' and dogs' risk-proneness varied with age, rather than species. Additionally, the presence of a familiar human increased the motivation of both, dogs and wolves to take the food.

摘要

驯化的一个基本机制是选择无所畏惧并接受人类作为社会伙伴,这可能会在行为和生理层面影响冒险行为以及将人类用作社会支持的能力。我们将行为观察与心率参数(即心率和心率变异性,HRV)相结合,对同等饲养和圈养的狼和狗进行研究,以评估在有或没有熟悉的人类提供社会支持的情况下,它们对潜在应激源(一个未知的旋转物体)附近提供的食物的反应。基于之前对狼和狗新恐惧症的研究,我们预计狗对该物体的恐惧较小,接近速度更快,表现出的矛盾行为更少,心率更低,心率变异性更高,尤其是在有人类伙伴在场的情况下。然而,我们发现主要是年龄和熟悉的人类的存在影响了我们研究对象的行为:年长的狼和狗通常更大胆,接近食物的速度更快,并且熟悉的人类的存在增加了获取食物的可能性。心率参数受年龄和测试阶段的影响。狼和狗在测试阶段开始和结束时的心率特别高。我们得出结论,在我们的范式中,狼和狗的风险倾向随年龄而变化,而非物种。此外,熟悉的人类的存在增加了狗和狼获取食物的动机。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7719/11709314/33659b09dc94/pone.0313916.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7719/11709314/39ea616f9d09/pone.0313916.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7719/11709314/22070408e182/pone.0313916.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7719/11709314/ff138e870a98/pone.0313916.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7719/11709314/d2619c436a43/pone.0313916.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7719/11709314/33659b09dc94/pone.0313916.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7719/11709314/39ea616f9d09/pone.0313916.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7719/11709314/22070408e182/pone.0313916.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7719/11709314/ff138e870a98/pone.0313916.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7719/11709314/d2619c436a43/pone.0313916.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7719/11709314/33659b09dc94/pone.0313916.g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Decreased risk-proneness with increasing age in equally raised and kept wolves and dogs.在同等饲养条件下,狼和狗随着年龄增长风险倾向降低。
PLoS One. 2025 Jan 8;20(1):e0313916. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0313916. eCollection 2025.
2
Context-Specific Arousal During Resting in Wolves and Dogs: Effects of Domestication?狼和狗休息时的特定情境唤醒:驯化的影响?
Front Psychol. 2020 Nov 24;11:568199. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.568199. eCollection 2020.
3
Food preferences of similarly raised and kept captive dogs and wolves.圈养和饲养条件相同的狗和狼的食物偏好。
PLoS One. 2018 Sep 20;13(9):e0203165. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0203165. eCollection 2018.
4
Wolves lead and dogs follow, but they both cooperate with humans.狼为首,狗随后,但都与人类合作。
Sci Rep. 2019 Mar 7;9(1):3796. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-40468-y.
5
Life experience rather than domestication accounts for dogs' increased oxytocin release during social contact with humans.生活经历而非驯化解释了狗在与人类社交接触时增加的催产素释放。
Sci Rep. 2021 Jul 13;11(1):14423. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-93922-1.
6
Does socio-ecology drive differences in alertness between wolves and dogs when resting?社会生态学是否导致狼和狗在休息时的警觉性存在差异?
Behav Processes. 2019 Sep;166:103877. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2019.05.024. Epub 2019 May 30.
7
Wolves, but not dogs, are prosocial in a touch screen task.狼,而不是狗,在触摸屏任务中具有亲社会行为。
PLoS One. 2019 May 1;14(5):e0215444. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0215444. eCollection 2019.
8
The role of domestication and experience in 'looking back' towards humans in an unsolvable task.在一项无法解决的任务中,驯化和经验在“回望”人类方面的作用。
Sci Rep. 2017 Apr 19;7:46636. doi: 10.1038/srep46636.
9
Endocrine changes related to dog domestication: Comparing urinary cortisol and oxytocin in hand-raised, pack-living dogs and wolves.与犬类驯化相关的内分泌变化:对比人工饲养群居的犬类和狼的尿液皮质醇和催产素。
Horm Behav. 2021 Feb;128:104901. doi: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2020.104901. Epub 2020 Nov 26.
10
Importance of a species' socioecology: Wolves outperform dogs in a conspecific cooperation task.物种社会生态学的重要性:在同种合作任务中,狼比狗表现更好。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Oct 31;114(44):11793-11798. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1709027114. Epub 2017 Oct 16.

本文引用的文献

1
Function predicts how people treat their dogs in a global sample.功能预测了在全球样本中人们如何对待他们的狗。
Sci Rep. 2023 Mar 27;13(1):4954. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-31938-5.
2
Bonded by nature: Humans form equally strong and reciprocated bonds with similar raised dogs and wolves.天生的纽带:人类与饲养方式相似的狗和狼形成同样强烈且相互的纽带。
Front Psychol. 2023 Jan 4;13:1044940. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1044940. eCollection 2022.
3
Drivers of within- and among-individual variation in risk-taking behaviour during reproduction in a long-lived bird.
在一种长寿鸟类的繁殖过程中,个体内和个体间冒险行为的驱动因素。
Proc Biol Sci. 2022 Sep 28;289(1983):20221338. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2022.1338. Epub 2022 Sep 21.
4
Taking confounding factors and life experience seriously.认真对待混杂因素和生活经历。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2022 Sep;26(9):730-731. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2022.06.007. Epub 2022 Jul 12.
5
Physiological pathways to rapid prosocial evolution.快速亲社会进化的生理途径。
Biol Futur. 2019 Apr;70(2):93-102. doi: 10.1556/019.70.2019.12. Epub 2019 Nov 16.
6
Context-Specific Arousal During Resting in Wolves and Dogs: Effects of Domestication?狼和狗休息时的特定情境唤醒:驯化的影响?
Front Psychol. 2020 Nov 24;11:568199. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.568199. eCollection 2020.
7
Social Context Influences Resting Physiology in Dogs.社会环境影响犬类的静息生理状态。
Animals (Basel). 2020 Nov 26;10(12):2214. doi: 10.3390/ani10122214.
8
Adult, intensively socialized wolves show features of attachment behaviour to their handler.成年、社会化程度高的狼对其 handler 表现出依恋行为的特征。
Sci Rep. 2020 Oct 14;10(1):17296. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-74325-0.
9
Behavioural and cognitive changes in aged pet dogs: No effects of an enriched diet and lifelong training.老年宠物犬的行为和认知变化:丰富饮食和终身训练无影响。
PLoS One. 2020 Sep 16;15(9):e0238517. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0238517. eCollection 2020.
10
Does socio-ecology drive differences in alertness between wolves and dogs when resting?社会生态学是否导致狼和狗在休息时的警觉性存在差异?
Behav Processes. 2019 Sep;166:103877. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2019.05.024. Epub 2019 May 30.