Center for Neuroscience at the University of Pittsburgh, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition, University of Pittsburgh and Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Medical Scientist Training Program, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.
Neuroimage. 2019 Oct 1;199:366-374. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.05.080. Epub 2019 May 31.
Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an established and effective treatment for several movement disorders and is being developed to treat a host of neuropsychiatric disorders including epilepsy, chronic pain, obsessive compulsive disorder, and depression. However, the neural mechanisms through which DBS produces therapeutic benefits, and in some cases unwanted side effects, in these disorders are only partially understood. Non-invasive neuroimaging techniques that can assess the neural effects of active stimulation are important for advancing our understanding of the neural basis of DBS therapy. Magnetoencephalography (MEG) is a safe, passive imaging modality with relatively high spatiotemporal resolution, which makes it a potentially powerful method for examining the cortical network effects of DBS. However, the degree to which magnetic artifacts produced by stimulation and the associated hardware can be suppressed from MEG data, and the comparability between signals measured during DBS-on and DBS-off conditions, have not been fully quantified. The present study used machine learning methods in conjunction with a visual perception task, which should be relatively unaffected by DBS, to quantify how well neural data can be salvaged from artifact contamination introduced by DBS and how comparable DBS-on and DBS-off data are after artifact removal. Machine learning also allowed us to determine whether the spatiotemporal pattern of neural activity recorded during stimulation are comparable to those recorded when stimulation is off. The spatiotemporal patterns of visually evoked neural fields could be accurately classified in all 8 patients with DBS implants during both DBS-on and DBS-off conditions and performed comparably across those two conditions. Further, the classification accuracy for classifiers trained on the spatiotemporal patterns evoked during DBS-on trials and applied to DBS-off trials, and vice versa, were similar to that of the classifiers trained and tested on either trial type, demonstrating the comparability of these patterns across conditions. Together, these results demonstrate the ability of MEG preprocessing techniques, like temporal signal space separation, to salvage neural data from recordings contaminated with DBS artifacts and validate MEG as a powerful tool to study the cortical consequences of DBS.
深部脑刺激 (DBS) 是治疗多种运动障碍的成熟且有效的方法,目前正在开发用于治疗多种神经精神疾病,包括癫痫、慢性疼痛、强迫症和抑郁症。然而,DBS 产生治疗益处,以及在某些情况下产生不必要的副作用的神经机制在这些疾病中仅部分得到理解。能够评估主动刺激的神经影响的非侵入性神经影像学技术对于推进我们对 DBS 治疗的神经基础的理解很重要。脑磁图 (MEG) 是一种安全、被动的成像方式,具有相对较高的时空分辨率,因此它是一种检查 DBS 对皮质网络影响的潜在强大方法。然而,刺激产生的磁场伪影以及相关硬件可以从 MEG 数据中抑制的程度,以及 DBS-on 和 DBS-off 条件下测量的信号的可比性,尚未完全量化。本研究使用机器学习方法结合视觉感知任务,该任务应相对不受 DBS 的影响,以量化从 DBS 引入的伪影污染中可以挽救多少神经数据,以及在去除伪影后 DBS-on 和 DBS-off 数据的可比性。机器学习还使我们能够确定在刺激期间记录的神经活动的时空模式是否与刺激关闭时记录的那些模式可比。在 DBS-on 和 DBS-off 条件下,所有 8 名植入 DBS 装置的患者都可以准确地对视觉诱发的神经场的时空模式进行分类,并且在这两种条件下表现相似。此外,在 DBS-on 试验期间激发的时空模式上训练的分类器并应用于 DBS-off 试验,反之亦然,其分类准确性与在任一试验类型上训练和测试的分类器相似,表明这些模式在条件之间的可比性。总之,这些结果表明,MEG 预处理技术(如时间信号空间分离)能够从受 DBS 伪影污染的记录中挽救神经数据,并验证了 MEG 作为研究 DBS 皮质后果的强大工具的能力。