Suppr超能文献

光生物调节对即刻和延迟加载的正畸微种植体稳定性和位移的影响:一项临床研究。

Effect of photobiomodulation on the stability and displacement of orthodontic mini-implants submitted to immediate and delayed loading: a clinical study.

机构信息

Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, Av. Do Café s/n, Monte Alegre, Ribeirão Preto, SP, 14040-904, Brazil.

Department of Dentistry, Division of Orthodontics, Faculty of Medicine & Dentistry, University of Alberta, 11405 - 87 Avenue NW, Edmonton, AB, T6G 1C9, Canada.

出版信息

Lasers Med Sci. 2019 Oct;34(8):1705-1715. doi: 10.1007/s10103-019-02818-0. Epub 2019 Jun 1.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of photobiomodulation (PBM) on the stability and displacement of orthodontic mini-implants (MIs) submitted to loading. Forty-eight and 35 mini-implants (1.5 × 8 × 1 mm) were assessed for stability and displacement, respectively (19 patients). MIs were allocated according to the intervention in 1-PBM + immediate loading (IL), 2-PBM + delayed loading (DL) (four weeks after implantation), 3-IL only, and 4-DL only. PBM (Therapy XT, DCM) was implemented using a red emission (660 nm, 4 J/cm, 0.1 W, 20 s) immediately after implantation (day 0) and infrared emissions (808 nm; 8 J/cm, 0.1 W, 40 s) in the following appointments every 48-72 h during two weeks (days 2, 4, 7, 9, 11, and 14). Loading of 150 gF was applied during three months for all MIs. The stability was assessed by resonance frequency analysis (Osstell ISQ), and images from Cone beam computed tomography were evaluated to determine the amount of the displacement of the MI's head. MIs from the PBM groups presented lower loss of stability (P = 0.0372). When the analysis considered the loading protocol as an additional variable, group two showed the lowest loss of stability, being significantly different from groups that did not receive PBM (P = 0.0161). There was no difference between groups two and four during the period without loading (P > 0.05). DL groups presented lower loss when the effective period of loading was assessed, independently of the application of PBM (P < 0.0001). All groups showed displacement of the MIs head without significant differences (P > 0.05). DL potentiated the effect of PBM, decreasing the loss of stability.

摘要

本研究旨在评估光生物调节(PBM)对加载后正畸微种植体(MIs)稳定性和位移的影响。分别评估了 48 个和 35 个微种植体(1.5×8×1mm)的稳定性和位移(19 名患者)。MIs 根据干预措施分为 1-PBM+即刻加载(IL)、2-PBM+延迟加载(DL)(植入后 4 周)、3-仅 IL 和 4-仅 DL。PBM(Therapy XT,DCM)在植入后即刻(第 0 天)使用红色发射(660nm,4J/cm,0.1W,20s),并在接下来的两周内每隔 48-72h 以红外发射(808nm;8J/cm,0.1W,40s)进行治疗,共 2 周(第 2、4、7、9、11 和 14 天)。所有 MIs 在三个月内施加 150gF 的载荷。稳定性通过共振频率分析(Osstell ISQ)进行评估,通过锥形束计算机断层扫描图像评估 MI 头部的位移量。PBM 组的 MIs 稳定性损失较小(P=0.0372)。当分析将加载方案作为附加变量时,第 2 组的稳定性损失最小,与未接受 PBM 的组有显著差异(P=0.0161)。在无加载期间,第 2 组和第 4 组之间没有差异(P>0.05)。在评估有效加载期时,DL 组的稳定性损失较小,无论是否应用 PBM 都是如此(P<0.0001)。所有组的 MI 头部均有位移,但无显著差异(P>0.05)。DL 增强了 PBM 的作用,减少了稳定性损失。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验