Gutiérrez Nicolás Fernando, Nazco Casariego Gloria Julia, Viña Romero María Micaela, González García Jonathan, Ramos Diaz Ruth, Perez Perez Jose Antonio
Pharmacy Department, Hospital Universitario de Canarias, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain.
Pharmacy Department, Hospital Universitario de Nuestra Señora de Candelaria, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain.
Eur J Hosp Pharm. 2016 May;23(3):131-133. doi: 10.1136/ejhpharm-2015-000732. Epub 2015 Oct 12.
The advent of Luer-type needleless venous access catheters has been accompanied by a growing number of catheter-related bloodstream infections. Our main objective was to compare rates of colonisation and phlebitis between our standard of care and the new passive disinfection system, using a Luer SwabCap bearing a sponge impregnated with 70% isopropyl alcohol.
We performed a prospective experimental study involving patients attending our day hospital oncology unit, with central venous (CV) or peripheral venous (PV) access lines with needleless connectors for antineoplastic treatment delivery. We assessed the colonisation rate by culture of the inside of the hubs (qualitative culture) and also assessed the possible appearance of phlebitis and the extra cost of introducing the new system in our oncology day hospital; nurse satisfaction was evaluated by a questionnaire. The effectiveness of the isopropyl alcohol disinfection cap was evaluated by analysing rates of catheter colonisation and phlebitis between two groups: group 1 comprised of patients receiving the standard disinfection method and group 2 comprised of patients receiving SwabCaps on any venous access connectors. Samples were taken from the catheter lumen through a sterile swab seeded in Luria Bertani-rich broth and cultivated for at least 48 h at 37°C. We also assessed the extra cost of introducing the new system in our oncology day hospital, and nurse satisfaction was evaluated by a questionnaire.
29 patients were included (13 in group 1 and 16 in group 2). In group 1, 56% of the samples were taken from CV access connectors versus 40% in group 2. Bacterial growth was detected in 43.7% of group 1 samples versus 0% in group 2 (p=0.006). No differences in the degree of contamination were found between CV and PV access connectors. No cases of phlebitis were observed. Nurse satisfaction with the new system was 9.2 out of a maximum score of 10. The incremental cost of incorporating the new system in our oncology unit was estimated at €1.87 836.
Passive disinfection systems help reduce colonisation of venous access catheters without requiring large economic investment or special training of health personnel.
鲁尔型无针静脉输液接头的出现伴随着越来越多与导管相关的血流感染。我们的主要目的是比较我们的标准护理措施与新的被动消毒系统之间的定植率和静脉炎发生率,新系统使用带有浸渍70%异丙醇海绵的鲁尔拭子帽。
我们进行了一项前瞻性实验研究,纳入了在我院日间肿瘤病房就诊的患者,这些患者通过带有无针接头的中心静脉(CV)或外周静脉(PV)通路接受抗肿瘤治疗。我们通过对接头内部进行培养(定性培养)来评估定植率,还评估了静脉炎的可能出现情况以及在我院肿瘤日间病房引入新系统的额外成本;通过问卷调查评估护士的满意度。通过分析两组之间的导管定植率和静脉炎发生率来评估异丙醇消毒帽的有效性:第1组由接受标准消毒方法的患者组成,第2组由在任何静脉通路接头上使用拭子帽的患者组成。通过接种在富含卢里亚 - 伯塔尼肉汤中的无菌拭子从导管腔内取样,并在37°C下培养至少48小时。我们还评估了在我院肿瘤日间病房引入新系统的额外成本,并通过问卷调查评估护士的满意度。
共纳入29例患者(第1组13例,第2组16例)。第1组中样本的40%来自外周静脉通路接头,而第2组为56%。第1组样本中43.7%检测到细菌生长,第2组为0%(p = 0.006)。中心静脉和外周静脉通路接头之间在污染程度上未发现差异。未观察到静脉炎病例。护士对新系统的满意度在满分10分中为9.2分。在我们肿瘤科室引入新系统的增量成本估计为1.87836欧元。
被动消毒系统有助于减少静脉输液接头的定植,无需大量经济投入或对医护人员进行特殊培训。