Suppr超能文献

药物停用的当前及未来研究与临床方向概述:减药的心理、传统及专业障碍。

Overview of current and future research and clinical directions for drug discontinuation: psychological, traditional and professional obstacles to deprescribing.

作者信息

Garfinkel Doron

机构信息

Wolfson Medical Center, Holon, Israel.

Homecare Service, Israel Cancer Association, Givatayim, Israel.

出版信息

Eur J Hosp Pharm. 2017 Jan;24(1):16-20. doi: 10.1136/ejhpharm-2016-000959.

Abstract

The vicious circle of age-related diseases, many experts and guidelines/drugs fuels the 21st century iatrogenic epidemic of inappropriate medication use and polypharmacy. There are no evidence-based medicine (EBM) 'guidelines' for treating older people, and knowledge gaps regarding dosage requirements. For all drugs, the positive benefit/risk ratio is decreasing/inverted in correlation to very old age, comorbidity, dementia, frailty and limited life-expectancy (VOCODFLEX). Main obstacles to routine deprescribing are emotional/psychological myths; patient-doctor interactions are expected to be transformed into prescription; doctors are perceived as expert prescribers who wisely choose the right medication/s to treat all diseases. Although most 'guidelines' were not proven in older people, particularly VOCODFLEX, doctors are afraid of lawsuits and of the patient/family reaction if they do not follow all experts' recommendations. Doctors are frustrated facing uncertainty regarding the effectiveness of strategies to reduce polypharmacy and the lack of EBM indicating when to de-prescribe. When explicit criteria and 'drugs to avoid' are used alone, we may disregard undiagnosed harms imposed by the remaining drug groups and interactions. The best approaches are implicit tools that take into consideration EBM data, clinical circumstances and medical judgement. The Garfinkel Good Palliative-Geriatric Practice method recommends deprescribing of as many drugs as possible simultaneously, giving high priority to patient/family preferences. It was proven highly effective and safe in nursing departments and in community-dwelling elders, having significant economic benefits as well.

摘要

许多专家以及指南/药物导致了与年龄相关疾病的恶性循环,助长了21世纪不适当用药和多重用药的医源性流行。目前尚无基于循证医学(EBM)的治疗老年人的“指南”,并且在剂量要求方面存在知识空白。对于所有药物而言,与高龄、合并症、痴呆、虚弱和预期寿命有限(VOCODFLEX)相关,其积极的效益/风险比正在降低/反转。常规减药的主要障碍是情感/心理误区;医患互动被期望转化为开处方;医生被视为明智地选择正确药物来治疗所有疾病的专业开处方者。尽管大多数“指南”在老年人中,尤其是VOCODFLEX人群中未经证实,但医生担心如果不遵循所有专家的建议会面临诉讼以及患者/家属的反应。面对减少多重用药策略有效性的不确定性以及缺乏表明何时减药的循证医学依据,医生感到沮丧。当仅使用明确的标准和“避免使用的药物”时,我们可能会忽视其余药物组和相互作用所造成的未被诊断出的危害。最佳方法是考虑到循证医学数据、临床情况和医学判断的隐性工具。加芬克尔良好姑息 - 老年医学实践方法建议尽可能同时停用多种药物,高度重视患者/家属的偏好。事实证明,该方法在护理部门和社区老年人中非常有效且安全,同时也具有显著的经济效益。

相似文献

7
Is my older cancer patient on too many medications?我的老年癌症患者服用的药物过多吗?
J Geriatr Oncol. 2017 Mar;8(2):77-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jgo.2016.10.003. Epub 2016 Nov 11.

引用本文的文献

7
Poly-de-prescribing to treat polypharmacy: efficacy and safety.通过减少多重用药来治疗多重用药:疗效与安全性
Ther Adv Drug Saf. 2018 Jan;9(1):25-43. doi: 10.1177/2042098617736192. Epub 2017 Oct 27.

本文引用的文献

3
End of Life Care in Frailty.衰弱患者的临终关怀
Interdiscip Top Gerontol Geriatr. 2015;41:151-60. doi: 10.1159/000381232. Epub 2015 Jul 17.
8
Patient perceptions of proactive medication discontinuation.患者对主动停药的认知。
Patient Educ Couns. 2015 Feb;98(2):220-5. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2014.11.010. Epub 2014 Nov 20.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验