Flôres Damiana da Rocha Vianna, Augusto de Toni Sartori Alexandre, Antunes Julia Borges, Nunes Pinto Alessandra, Pletsch Julia, da Silva Dal Pizzol Tatiane
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Faculdade de Farmacia, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
Centro de Informações sobre Medicamentos do Rio Grandedo Sul. CIM-RS, UFRGS, Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil.
Eur J Hosp Pharm. 2018 Sep;25(5):262-266. doi: 10.1136/ejhpharm-2017-001417. Epub 2018 Mar 22.
To characterise information requests (IRs) from hospitals received by a drug information center (DIC-RS) according to the resolution of the inquiries.
The sample consisted of all requestors and their respective IRs registered in the DIC-RS database from January 2012 to December 2016. Request without information in the consulted literature (RWI) were categorised according to the institution of origin. IRs from hospitals were classified by the information source, topic and subtopic of the questions, and the number of drugs and the pharmacological or therapeutic group.
A total of 2,500 IRs were analysed. Of those, 25% did not exhibit conclusive information in the consulted sources. RWI from hospitals represented 51% of all RWI, followed by those from community pharmacies (13%) and health centres (9%). Tertiary literature was the most commonly used source (73%) for IRs from hospitals. The greatest difficulties in finding information were related to off-label drug administration and indication issues (52% of RWI). The most common type of off-label use was related to changes in the original pharmaceutical form of the drug. Furthermore, 61% of RWI were directed at a specific drug, mostly systemic anti-infectives.
We found that a quarter of the answers did not exhibit conclusive information in the consulted sources. Answers to IRs from the hospital environment exhibited the greatest extent of limited information, and off-label use was responsible for most cases.
根据咨询结果对药物信息中心(DIC-RS)收到的医院信息请求(IRs)进行特征描述。
样本包括2012年1月至2016年12月在DIC-RS数据库中登记的所有请求者及其各自的IRs。咨询文献中无信息的请求(RWI)根据来源机构进行分类。医院的IRs按问题的信息来源、主题和子主题、药物数量以及药理或治疗组进行分类。
共分析了2500份IRs。其中,25%在咨询来源中未显示确凿信息。医院的RWI占所有RWI的51%,其次是社区药房(13%)和健康中心(9%)。三级文献是医院IRs最常用的信息来源(73%)。查找信息的最大困难与药品未标示的用法及适应症问题有关(占RWI的52%)。最常见的未标示用法类型与药物原始剂型的改变有关。此外,61%的RWI针对特定药物,主要是全身用抗感染药。
我们发现四分之一的答案在咨询来源中未显示确凿信息。医院环境中IRs的答案显示出信息受限的程度最大,且大多数情况是由药品未标示的用法导致的。