• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用系统工程框架评估重症患者质子泵抑制剂的处方情况。

Using a Systems Engineering Framework to Evaluate Proton Pump Inhibitor Prescribing in Critically Ill Patients.

作者信息

Tischendorf Jessica S, Knobloch Mary J, Musuuza Jackson S, Safdar Nasia

出版信息

J Healthc Qual. 2020 Jul/Aug;42(4):e39-e49. doi: 10.1097/JHQ.0000000000000209.

DOI:10.1097/JHQ.0000000000000209
PMID:31157697
Abstract

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are a risk factor for hospital-acquired Clostridium difficile infection (CDI). Much PPI use is inappropriate, and interventions to reduce PPI use, such as for stress ulcer prophylaxis in all critically ill patients, are essential to reduce CDI rates. This mixed-methods study in a combined medical-surgical intensive care unit at a tertiary academic medical center used a human factors engineering approach to understand barriers and facilitators to optimizing PPI prescribing in these patients. We performed chart review of patients for whom PPIs were prescribed to evaluate prescribing practices. Semistructured provider interviews were conducted to determine barriers and facilitators to reducing unnecessary PPI use. Emergent themes from provider interviews were classified according to the Systems Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety model. In our intensive care unit, 25% of PPI days were not clinically indicated. Barriers to optimizing PPI prescribing included inadequate provider education, lack of institutional guidelines for stress ulcer prophylaxis, and strong institutional culture favoring PPI use. Potential facilitators included increased pharmacy oversight, provider education, and embedded decision support in the electronic medical record. Interventions addressing barriers noted by front line providers are needed to reduce unnecessary PPI use, and future studies should assess the impact of such interventions on CDI rates.

摘要

质子泵抑制剂(PPIs)是医院获得性艰难梭菌感染(CDI)的一个危险因素。许多PPI的使用并不恰当,采取干预措施以减少PPI的使用,如对所有重症患者进行应激性溃疡预防,对于降低CDI发生率至关重要。这项在一家三级学术医疗中心的内科与外科综合重症监护病房开展的混合方法研究,采用了人因工程学方法来了解优化这些患者PPI处方的障碍和促进因素。我们对开具了PPI的患者进行病历审查,以评估处方行为。开展了半结构化的医护人员访谈,以确定减少不必要PPI使用的障碍和促进因素。医护人员访谈中出现的新主题根据患者安全系统工程倡议模型进行分类。在我们的重症监护病房中,25%的PPI使用天数并无临床指征。优化PPI处方的障碍包括医护人员教育不足、缺乏应激性溃疡预防的机构指南以及倾向于使用PPI的强大机构文化。潜在的促进因素包括加强药房监管、医护人员教育以及在电子病历中嵌入决策支持。需要采取干预措施来消除一线医护人员指出的障碍,以减少不必要的PPI使用,未来的研究应评估此类干预措施对CDI发生率的影响。

相似文献

1
Using a Systems Engineering Framework to Evaluate Proton Pump Inhibitor Prescribing in Critically Ill Patients.使用系统工程框架评估重症患者质子泵抑制剂的处方情况。
J Healthc Qual. 2020 Jul/Aug;42(4):e39-e49. doi: 10.1097/JHQ.0000000000000209.
2
Risk of Clostridium difficile Infection with the Use of a Proton Pump Inhibitor for Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis in Critically Ill Patients.在危重症患者中使用质子泵抑制剂预防应激性溃疡时艰难梭菌感染的风险
Gut Liver. 2016 Jul 15;10(4):581-6. doi: 10.5009/gnl15324.
3
Implementation of Global Strategies to Prevent Hospital-Onset Clostridium difficile Infection: Targeting Proton Pump Inhibitors and Probiotics.实施全球预防医院获得性艰难梭菌感染的策略:以质子泵抑制剂和益生菌为目标
Ann Pharmacother. 2017 Oct;51(10):848-854. doi: 10.1177/1060028017694050. Epub 2017 Aug 18.
4
Proton Pump Inhibitors and the Risk for Hospital-Acquired Clostridium difficile Infection.质子泵抑制剂与医院获得性艰难梭菌感染的风险。
Mayo Clin Proc. 2013 Oct;88(10):1085-90. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2013.07.004. Epub 2013 Sep 5.
5
Continuous Proton Pump Inhibitor Therapy and the Associated Risk of Recurrent Clostridium difficile Infection.连续质子泵抑制剂治疗与复发性艰难梭菌感染的相关风险。
JAMA Intern Med. 2015 May;175(5):784-91. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.42.
6
Proton pump inhibitors increase the risk for hospital-acquired Clostridium difficile infection in critically ill patients.质子泵抑制剂会增加重症患者发生医院获得性艰难梭菌感染的风险。
Crit Care. 2014 Dec 24;18(6):714. doi: 10.1186/s13054-014-0714-7.
7
Comparison of the Hospital-Acquired Infection Risk of Using Proton Pump Inhibitors versus Histamine-2 Receptor Antagonists for Prophylaxis and Treatment of Stress Ulcers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.质子泵抑制剂与组胺 2 受体拮抗剂用于预防和治疗应激性溃疡的医院获得性感染风险比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Gut Liver. 2017 Nov 15;11(6):781-788. doi: 10.5009/gnl16568.
8
Proton Pump Inhibitors Do Not Increase Risk for Clostridium difficile Infection in the Intensive Care Unit.质子泵抑制剂不会增加重症监护病房艰难梭菌感染的风险。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2016 Nov;111(11):1641-1648. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2016.343. Epub 2016 Aug 30.
9
Cost-Effectiveness of Histamine Receptor Antagonists Versus Proton Pump Inhibitors for Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis in Critically Ill Patients.组胺受体拮抗剂与质子泵抑制剂用于危重症患者应激性溃疡预防的成本效益分析
Pharmacotherapy. 2017 Jan;37(1):43-53. doi: 10.1002/phar.1859. Epub 2016 Dec 20.
10
Use of proton pump inhibitors with lack of diagnostic indications in 22 Midwestern US skilled nursing facilities.质子泵抑制剂在 22 家美国中西部熟练护理设施中缺乏诊断指征的使用情况。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2013 Jun;14(6):429-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2013.01.021. Epub 2013 Apr 9.