• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

质子泵抑制剂与组胺 2 受体拮抗剂用于预防和治疗应激性溃疡的医院获得性感染风险比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Comparison of the Hospital-Acquired Infection Risk of Using Proton Pump Inhibitors versus Histamine-2 Receptor Antagonists for Prophylaxis and Treatment of Stress Ulcers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, University of Nevada School of Medicine, Las Vegas, NV, USA.

Department of Global Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

出版信息

Gut Liver. 2017 Nov 15;11(6):781-788. doi: 10.5009/gnl16568.

DOI:10.5009/gnl16568
PMID:28506028
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5669593/
Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Although proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) have been widely used for the prevention and treatment of stress gastric ulcers in hospital settings, there are concerns that PPIs increase the risk of infection (CDI). However, little is known about the risk of CDI following PPI and histamine-2 receptor antagonist (H2RA) use. We evaluated the comparative hospital-acquired CDI occurrence risk associated with the concurrent use of PPIs versus H2RAs.

METHODS

A systematic search of PubMed, MEDLINE/Ovid, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Web of Science, and Google Scholar through August 19, 2016, identified 12 studies that reported the hospital-acquired CDI occurrence following H2RA and PPI use for the prevention and treatment of stress gastric ulcers. Random-effects pooled odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were estimated. Heterogeneity was measured using ², and a meta-regression analysis was conducted. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) system was used to assess the overall quality of the evidence.

RESULTS

A total of 74,132 patients from 12 observational studies were analyzed. Compared to H2RAs, PPIs increased the risk of CDI by 38.6% (pooled odds ratio, 1.386; 95% confidence interval, 1.152 to 1.668; p=0.001; ²=42.81%). Subgroup analyses of the purpose of study medication use, study site, and study design confirmed the consistency of a greater CDI risk with PPIs than with H2RAs. The overall quality of evidence was rated as low.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of PPIs for both the prevention and treatment of stress ulcers was associated with a 38.6% increased risk of hospital-acquired CDI occurrence compared to H2RA use.

摘要

背景/目的:质子泵抑制剂(PPIs)已广泛用于预防和治疗医院环境中的应激性胃溃疡,但人们担心 PPI 会增加感染(CDI)的风险。然而,对于 PPI 和组胺 2 受体拮抗剂(H2RA)使用后 CDI 的风险知之甚少。我们评估了同时使用 PPI 与 H2RA 与医院获得性 CDI 发生风险的相关性。

方法

通过 8 月 19 日之前对 PubMed、MEDLINE/Ovid、护理和联合健康文献累积索引(CINAHL)、Web of Science 和 Google Scholar 的系统搜索,确定了 12 项研究报告了使用 H2RA 和 PPI 预防和治疗应激性胃溃疡时发生医院获得性 CDI 的情况。使用随机效应汇总比值比和 95%置信区间进行估计。使用 ²测量异质性,并进行了荟萃回归分析。使用推荐评估、制定和评估(GRADE)系统评估证据的总体质量。

结果

对来自 12 项观察性研究的 74132 名患者进行了分析。与 H2RA 相比,PPIs 使 CDI 的风险增加了 38.6%(汇总比值比,1.386;95%置信区间,1.152 至 1.668;p=0.001;²=42.81%)。对研究药物使用目的、研究地点和研究设计的亚组分析证实了与 H2RA 相比,PPIs 具有更大的 CDI 风险。证据的总体质量评为低。

结论

与使用 H2RA 相比,预防和治疗应激性溃疡时使用 PPI 与医院获得性 CDI 发生风险增加 38.6%相关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/75f7/5669593/b3131729a556/gnl-11-781f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/75f7/5669593/b12dbad16490/gnl-11-781f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/75f7/5669593/dabcc1b730fb/gnl-11-781f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/75f7/5669593/85b5c56f0104/gnl-11-781f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/75f7/5669593/b3131729a556/gnl-11-781f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/75f7/5669593/b12dbad16490/gnl-11-781f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/75f7/5669593/dabcc1b730fb/gnl-11-781f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/75f7/5669593/85b5c56f0104/gnl-11-781f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/75f7/5669593/b3131729a556/gnl-11-781f4.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparison of the Hospital-Acquired Infection Risk of Using Proton Pump Inhibitors versus Histamine-2 Receptor Antagonists for Prophylaxis and Treatment of Stress Ulcers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.质子泵抑制剂与组胺 2 受体拮抗剂用于预防和治疗应激性溃疡的医院获得性感染风险比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Gut Liver. 2017 Nov 15;11(6):781-788. doi: 10.5009/gnl16568.
2
A comparison of the cost-effectiveness of five strategies for the prevention of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug-induced gastrointestinal toxicity: a systematic review with economic modelling.五种预防非甾体抗炎药所致胃肠道毒性策略的成本效益比较:一项基于经济模型的系统评价
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Oct;10(38):iii-iv, xi-xiii, 1-183. doi: 10.3310/hta10380.
3
Proton pump inhibitors therapy and risk of Clostridium difficile infection: Systematic review and meta-analysis.质子泵抑制剂治疗与艰难梭菌感染风险:系统评价和荟萃分析。
World J Gastroenterol. 2017 Sep 21;23(35):6500-6515. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i35.6500.
4
Association of Gastric Acid Suppression With Recurrent Clostridium difficile Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.胃酸抑制与艰难梭菌反复感染的关联:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Intern Med. 2017 Jun 1;177(6):784-791. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.0212.
5
Interventions for preventing upper gastrointestinal bleeding in people admitted to intensive care units.重症监护病房患者上消化道出血的预防干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jun 4;6(6):CD008687. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008687.pub2.
6
Proton pump inhibitors for functional dyspepsia.用于功能性消化不良的质子泵抑制剂。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Nov 21;11(11):CD011194. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011194.pub3.
7
Proton pump inhibitors for functional dyspepsia.用于功能性消化不良的质子泵抑制剂。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Mar 8;3(3):CD011194. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011194.pub2.
8
Probiotics for the prevention of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea in adults and children.用于预防成人和儿童艰难梭菌相关性腹泻的益生菌
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 19;12(12):CD006095. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006095.pub4.
9
Prevention of NSAID-induced gastroduodenal ulcers.非甾体抗炎药引起的胃十二指肠溃疡的预防
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2002(4):CD002296. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002296.
10
Drugs for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting in adults after general anaesthesia: a network meta-analysis.成人全身麻醉后预防术后恶心呕吐的药物:网状Meta分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Oct 19;10(10):CD012859. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012859.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Proton Pump Inhibitor Use and Risk of Clostridioides difficile Infection: An Umbrella Review of 11 Meta-Analyses.质子泵抑制剂的使用与艰难梭菌感染风险:对11项荟萃分析的综合评价
Cureus. 2025 Jul 6;17(7):e87383. doi: 10.7759/cureus.87383. eCollection 2025 Jul.
2
Recurrent Clostridioides difficile Infection (CDI) in Patients Treated With Vancomycin at Johns Hopkins Aramco Healthcare (JHAH), Dhahran, Saudi Arabia.沙特阿拉伯达兰市约翰霍普金斯阿美医疗保健公司(JHAH)接受万古霉素治疗的患者复发性艰难梭菌感染(CDI)
Cureus. 2025 May 31;17(5):e85116. doi: 10.7759/cureus.85116. eCollection 2025 May.
3
Appropriateness and inappropriate medication predictors of stress ulcer prophylaxis in the intensive care unit.

本文引用的文献

1
The burden of clostridium difficile infection: estimates of the incidence of CDI from U.S. Administrative databases.艰难梭菌感染的负担:来自美国行政数据库的艰难梭菌感染发病率估计
BMC Infect Dis. 2016 Apr 22;16:177. doi: 10.1186/s12879-016-1501-7.
2
Risk of Clostridium difficile Infection with the Use of a Proton Pump Inhibitor for Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis in Critically Ill Patients.在危重症患者中使用质子泵抑制剂预防应激性溃疡时艰难梭菌感染的风险
Gut Liver. 2016 Jul 15;10(4):581-6. doi: 10.5009/gnl15324.
3
Identification of Medicare Recipients at Highest Risk for Clostridium difficile Infection in the US by Population Attributable Risk Analysis.
重症监护病房应激性溃疡预防用药的合理性及不合理用药预测因素
Front Pharmacol. 2025 Jan 7;15:1401335. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1401335. eCollection 2024.
4
Risk factors for gastric mucosa lesion in critically ill patients undergoing endoscopy for percutaneous gastrostomy: a case-control study.接受经皮胃造瘘术内镜检查的危重症患者胃黏膜病变的危险因素:一项病例对照研究。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2024 Dec 18;24(1):464. doi: 10.1186/s12876-024-03567-3.
5
Multidisciplinary Consensus for Rationalizing the Use of Acid Suppressants in Children and Adults: CONFOR.儿童和成人抑酸剂合理使用的多学科共识:CONFOR
Euroasian J Hepatogastroenterol. 2024 Jan-Jun;14(1):99-119. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10018-1430.
6
Pharmacological interventions for preventing upper gastrointestinal bleeding in people admitted to intensive care units: a network meta-analysis.重症监护病房患者预防上消化道出血的药物干预:一项网状Meta分析。
BMJ Evid Based Med. 2025 Jan 22;30(1):22-35. doi: 10.1136/bmjebm-2024-112886.
7
Outcomes of patients with traumatic brain injury after stress ulcer prophylaxis: a retrospective multicenter study.应激性溃疡预防治疗后创伤性脑损伤患者的结局:一项回顾性多中心研究
Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. 2024 Feb 23;9(1):e001285. doi: 10.1136/tsaco-2023-001285. eCollection 2024.
8
Epidemiology of infection at a tertiary care facility in Saudi Arabia: Results of prospective surveillance.沙特阿拉伯一家三级保健机构感染的流行病学:前瞻性监测结果。
Saudi Med J. 2024 Feb;45(2):188-193. doi: 10.15537/smj.2024.45.2.20230398.
9
Association Between Risk of Clostridium difficile Infection and Duration of Proton Pump Inhibitor or H2-Receptor Antagonist Use in Hospitalized Patients.住院患者艰难梭菌感染风险与质子泵抑制剂或H2受体拮抗剂使用时长之间的关联
Infect Dis Ther. 2024 Feb;13(2):373-383. doi: 10.1007/s40121-024-00922-5. Epub 2024 Jan 30.
10
Prevalence of Clostridium Difficile Infection (CDI) among Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) Patients in Comparison to Non-IBD Patients in King Abdulaziz Medical City in Jeddah.吉达阿卜杜勒阿齐兹国王医疗城炎症性肠病(IBD)患者与非IBD患者中艰难梭菌感染(CDI)的患病率比较
Interdiscip Perspect Infect Dis. 2023 Oct 13;2023:9958104. doi: 10.1155/2023/9958104. eCollection 2023.
通过人群归因风险分析确定美国艰难梭菌感染风险最高的医疗保险受益人群。
PLoS One. 2016 Feb 9;11(2):e0146822. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0146822. eCollection 2016.
4
Burden of Clostridium difficile infection in the United States.美国艰难梭菌感染的负担
N Engl J Med. 2015 Feb 26;372(9):825-34. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1408913.
5
Proton pump inhibitors increase the risk for hospital-acquired Clostridium difficile infection in critically ill patients.质子泵抑制剂会增加重症患者发生医院获得性艰难梭菌感染的风险。
Crit Care. 2014 Dec 24;18(6):714. doi: 10.1186/s13054-014-0714-7.
6
Histamine-2 receptor antagonists vs proton pump inhibitors on gastrointestinal tract hemorrhage and infectious complications in the intensive care unit.组胺 2 受体拮抗剂与质子泵抑制剂对重症监护病房胃肠道出血和感染并发症的影响。
JAMA Intern Med. 2014 Apr;174(4):564-74. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.14673.
7
Proton Pump Inhibitors and the Risk for Hospital-Acquired Clostridium difficile Infection.质子泵抑制剂与医院获得性艰难梭菌感染的风险。
Mayo Clin Proc. 2013 Oct;88(10):1085-90. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2013.07.004. Epub 2013 Sep 5.
8
Cost-effectiveness analysis: stress ulcer bleeding prophylaxis with proton pump inhibitors, H2 receptor antagonists.成本效益分析:质子泵抑制剂、H2 受体拮抗剂预防应激性溃疡出血。
Value Health. 2013 Jan-Feb;16(1):14-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2012.08.2213.
9
Proton pump inhibitors versus histamine 2 receptor antagonists for stress ulcer prophylaxis in critically ill patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.质子泵抑制剂与组胺 2 受体拮抗剂用于危重症患者应激性溃疡预防的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Crit Care Med. 2013 Mar;41(3):693-705. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3182758734.
10
Association between proton pump inhibitor therapy and clostridium difficile infection: a contemporary systematic review and meta-analysis.质子泵抑制剂治疗与艰难梭菌感染的关联:当代系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2012;7(12):e50836. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0050836. Epub 2012 Dec 7.