Dirk Judith, Kratzsch Gesa Katharina, Prindle John P, Kröhne Ulf, Goldhammer Frank, Schmiedek Florian
Department of Education and Human Development, German Institute for International Educational Research (DIPF), 60486 Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Department of Psychology, Goethe University, 60232 Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
J Intell. 2017 Apr 10;5(2):12. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence5020012.
The effects of aging on response time were examined in a paper-based lexical-decision experiment with younger (age 18-36) and older (age 64-75) adults, applying Ratcliff's diffusion model. Using digital pens allowed the paper-based assessment of response times for single items. Age differences previously reported by Ratcliff and colleagues in computer-based experiments were partly replicated: older adults responded more conservatively than younger adults and showed a slowing of their nondecision components of RT by 53 ms. The rates of evidence accumulation (drift rate) showed no age-related differences. Participants with a higher score in a vocabulary test also had higher drift rates. The experiment demonstrates the possibility to use formal processing models with paper-based tests.
在一项针对年轻人(18 - 36岁)和老年人(64 - 75岁)的纸质词汇判定实验中,运用拉特克利夫扩散模型研究了衰老对反应时间的影响。使用数字笔能够对单个项目的反应时间进行基于纸质的评估。拉特克利夫及其同事之前在基于计算机的实验中报告的年龄差异部分得到了重现:老年人比年轻人反应更保守,并且其反应时的非决策成分减慢了53毫秒。证据积累速率(漂移率)未显示出与年龄相关的差异。在词汇测试中得分较高的参与者也有较高的漂移率。该实验证明了在纸质测试中使用形式化处理模型的可能性。