Tokyo Rheumatism Pain Clinic, Tokyo, Japan.
Department of Rheumatology, Tokyo Medical University Hachioji Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan.
Pain Med. 2020 Feb 1;21(2):326-332. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnz064.
OBJECTIVES: Existing treatments for fibromyalgia have limited efficacy, and only a minority of individuals clinically respond to any single intervention. This study was a prospective, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, controlled clinical trial to evaluate the feasibility of alternating magnetic field therapy in fibromyalgia patients by comparing the Angel Touch device (AT-02) with a sham control (S-01). METHODS: Two sites enrolled 44 subjects with diagnosed fibromyalgia. After informed consent, subjects taking prohibited concomitant drugs underwent a washout period of two or more weeks. All subjects then began a one-week run-in period. Numerical rating scale (NRS) pain scores were collected without device intervention for one day, followed by S-01 application to four or more painful sites for 10 minutes at each site, twice daily for six days. Subjects were then randomized to AT-02 or S-01, applied to four or more painful sites for 10 minutes at each site, twice daily for eight weeks. NRS scores were obtained twice daily during the entire treatment period. RESULTS: The primary end point (change in NRS ± SD at week 8 vs baseline) was -0.94 ± 1.33 in the AT-02 group and -0.22 ± 1.38 in the S-01 group. A trend toward a between-group difference in eight-week NRS scores favored the AT-02 group (-0.73, 95% confidence interval = -1.56 to 0.11, P = 0.086). An adjusted repeated measure analysis detected a significant difference in NRS scores (P = 0.039). CONCLUSIONS: The reduction in NRS scores for AT-02 relative to sham was comparable to reductions observed in meta-analyses of fibromyalgia drug therapy. The unadjusted results and the persistence of the pain score reductions remain encouraging.
目的:现有的纤维肌痛治疗方法疗效有限,只有少数个体对任何单一干预措施有临床反应。本研究是一项前瞻性、多中心、随机、双盲、对照临床试验,通过比较 Angel Touch 设备(AT-02)与假对照(S-01),评估交变磁场治疗纤维肌痛患者的可行性。
方法:两个地点共招募了 44 名确诊为纤维肌痛的患者。在获得知情同意后,服用禁用伴随药物的患者进行了两周或更长时间的洗脱期。然后,所有患者开始为期一周的预试验期。在没有设备干预的情况下,连续一天收集数字评定量表(NRS)疼痛评分,然后每天两次应用 S-01 于四个或更多疼痛部位,每次 10 分钟,持续六天。然后,患者随机分为 AT-02 或 S-01 组,每天两次应用于四个或更多疼痛部位,每次 10 分钟,持续八周。在整个治疗期间,每天两次采集 NRS 评分。
结果:主要终点(第八周与基线相比的 NRS±SD 变化)在 AT-02 组为-0.94±1.33,在 S-01 组为-0.22±1.38。两组间八周 NRS 评分的差异有趋势,有利于 AT-02 组(-0.73,95%置信区间=-1.56 至 0.11,P=0.086)。调整后的重复测量分析检测到 NRS 评分有显著差异(P=0.039)。
结论:与假对照相比,AT-02 组的 NRS 评分降低与纤维肌痛药物治疗的荟萃分析观察到的降低相当。未调整的结果和疼痛评分降低的持续存在仍然令人鼓舞。
Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2019-2-8
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017-10-9
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016-9-29
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015-6-15
Arthritis Res Ther. 2014-1-17