• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

紧急宫颈环扎术:妊娠及新生儿结局

Emergency cerclage: gestational and neonatal outcomes.

作者信息

Costa Maíra Marinho Freire, Amorim Filho Antonio Gomes de, Barros Mônica Fairbanks de, Rodrigues Agatha Sacramento, Zugaib Marcelo, Francisco Rossana Pulcineli Vieira, Carvalho Mário Henrique Burlacchini de

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of São Paulo Medical School, São Paulo, Brasil.

出版信息

Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2019 Jun 3;65(5):598-602. doi: 10.1590/1806-9282.65.5.598.

DOI:10.1590/1806-9282.65.5.598
PMID:31166434
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The gestational and neonatal outcomes of women with early cervical dilatation undergoing emergency cerclage were evaluated and compared with women treated with expectant management and bed rest.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of pregnant women admitted between 2001 and 2017 with a diagnosis of early cervical dilatation and/or bulging membranes. Patients with a singleton pregnancy of a fetus without malformations, between 16 and 25 weeks and 6 days, with cervical dilatation of 1 to 3 cm were included; patients who delivered or miscarried within 2 days after admission were excluded.

RESULTS

The study enrolled 30 patients: 19 in the cerclage group and 11 in the rest group. There was a significant difference, with the cerclage group showing better results concerning gestational age at delivery (28.7 vs. 23.3 weeks; p=0.031) and latency between hospital admission and delivery (48.6 vs. 16 days; p=0.016). The fetal death rate was lower in the cerclage group (5.3% vs. 54.5%, p=0.004). Considering gestational age at delivery of live newborns, no difference was observed between the cerclage and rest groups (29.13 vs. 27.4 weeks; p=0.857).

CONCLUSIONS

Emergency cerclage was associated with longer latency, a significant impact on gestational age at delivery and reduction in the fetal death rate.

摘要

背景

对接受紧急宫颈环扎术的宫颈过早扩张女性的妊娠及新生儿结局进行评估,并与接受期待治疗和卧床休息的女性进行比较。

方法

回顾性分析2001年至2017年期间收治的诊断为宫颈过早扩张和/或胎膜膨出的孕妇。纳入单胎妊娠、胎儿无畸形、孕16周0天至25周6天、宫颈扩张1至3 cm的患者;排除入院后2天内分娩或流产的患者。

结果

该研究纳入30例患者:宫颈环扎组19例,其余组11例。两组间存在显著差异,宫颈环扎组在分娩孕周(28.7周对23.3周;p = 0.031)及入院至分娩间隔时间(48.6天对16天;p = 0.016)方面结果更好。宫颈环扎组的胎儿死亡率更低(5.3%对54.5%,p = 0.004)。就存活新生儿的分娩孕周而言,宫颈环扎组与其余组之间未观察到差异(29.13周对27.4周;p = 0.857)。

结论

紧急宫颈环扎术与更长的间隔时间、对分娩孕周有显著影响以及胎儿死亡率降低相关。

相似文献

1
Emergency cerclage: gestational and neonatal outcomes.紧急宫颈环扎术:妊娠及新生儿结局
Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2019 Jun 3;65(5):598-602. doi: 10.1590/1806-9282.65.5.598.
2
Emergency cerclage in twins during mid gestation may have favorable outcomes: Results of a retrospective cohort.孕中期双胎紧急宫颈环扎术可能有良好结局:一项回顾性队列研究结果
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2018 Nov;47(9):451-453. doi: 10.1016/j.jogoh.2018.08.010. Epub 2018 Aug 23.
3
Cerclage in twin pregnancy with dilated cervix between 16 to 24 weeks of gestation: retrospective cohort study.宫颈扩张 16 至 24 周的双胎妊娠行宫颈环扎术:回顾性队列研究。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Jul;215(1):98.e1-98.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.01.172. Epub 2016 Jan 28.
4
Emergency cervical cerclage. Does the gestational age make a difference?紧急宫颈环扎术。孕周会有影响吗?
Saudi Med J. 2004 Aug;25(8):1028-31.
5
Effects of emergency cervical cerclage on pregnancy outcome: a retrospective study of 158 cases.紧急宫颈环扎术对妊娠结局的影响:一项158例病例的回顾性研究
Med Sci Monit. 2015 May 15;21:1395-401. doi: 10.12659/MSM.893244.
6
Emergency cerclage versus expectant management for prolapsed fetal membranes: a retrospective, comparative study.胎膜早破的紧急宫颈环扎术与期待疗法:一项回顾性比较研究。
J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2014 Feb;40(2):381-6. doi: 10.1111/jog.12207. Epub 2013 Oct 22.
7
Emergency Cerclage: Improvement of Outcomes by Standardization of Management.紧急宫颈环扎术:通过管理标准化改善结局
Fetal Diagn Ther. 2016;39(2):134-9. doi: 10.1159/000433465. Epub 2015 Jul 17.
8
Pregnancy outcome after placement of 'rescue' Shirodkar cerclage.放置“挽救性”希罗德卡尔宫颈环扎术后的妊娠结局
J Perinatol. 2009 Apr;29(4):276-9. doi: 10.1038/jp.2008.221. Epub 2009 Jan 22.
9
Obstetrical outcomes of emergency compared with elective cervical cerclage.急诊与择期宫颈环扎术的产科结局比较。
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2017 Jul;30(14):1650-1654. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2016.1220529. Epub 2016 Aug 23.
10
The effect of second trimester emergency cervical cerclage on perinatal outcome.孕中期紧急宫颈环扎术对围产期结局的影响。
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2012 Sep;25(9):1746-9. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2012.663822. Epub 2012 Apr 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Pregnancy outcomes with the reuse of the same suture in the history-indicated modified transvaginal cervicoisthmic cerclage.有既往史的改良经阴道宫颈峡部环扎术中重复使用同一缝线的妊娠结局。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2025 Jun 20;104(25):e42687. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000042687.
2
Analysis of perinatal outcomes for emergency cervical cerclage in singleton pregnancies at 24-28 weeks of gestation.分析 24-28 孕周单胎妊娠紧急宫颈环扎术的围产结局。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2024 Jul;310(1):229-235. doi: 10.1007/s00404-024-07493-3. Epub 2024 Apr 23.
3
Comparison of emergency cervical cerclage and expectant treatment in cervical insufficiency in singleton pregnancy: A meta-analysis.
比较单胎妊娠宫颈机能不全中行紧急宫颈环扎术与期待治疗的效果:一项荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2023 Feb 24;18(2):e0278342. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0278342. eCollection 2023.
4
A Three-Step Procedure for Emergency Cerclage: Gestational and Neonatal Outcomes.三步紧急宫颈环扎术:妊娠和新生儿结局。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Feb 24;19(5):2636. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19052636.
5
Emergency Cervical Cerclage.急诊宫颈环扎术
J Clin Med. 2021 Mar 18;10(6):1270. doi: 10.3390/jcm10061270.
6
A comparison of pregnancy outcome of emergency modified transvaginal cervicoisthmic cerclage performed in twin and singleton pregnancies.比较经阴道宫颈环扎术紧急改良术在双胎妊娠和单胎妊娠中的妊娠结局。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2021 May;303(5):1197-1205. doi: 10.1007/s00404-020-05852-4. Epub 2021 Jan 2.