• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

紧急宫颈环扎术对妊娠结局的影响:一项158例病例的回顾性研究

Effects of emergency cervical cerclage on pregnancy outcome: a retrospective study of 158 cases.

作者信息

Zhu Li-Qiong, Chen Hui, Chen Li-Bin, Liu Ying-Lin, Tian Jian-Ping, Wang Yun-Hui, Zhang Rui, Zhang Jian-Ping

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, un Yat-sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China (mainland).

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China (mainland).

出版信息

Med Sci Monit. 2015 May 15;21:1395-401. doi: 10.12659/MSM.893244.

DOI:10.12659/MSM.893244
PMID:25975832
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4444177/
Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of emergency cervical cerclage in women with advanced cervical dilatation and bulging of fetal membranes. The study included 158 women who underwent emergency cervical cerclage because of cervix dilatation and protruding membranes in mid-trimester at Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University. Pregnancy outcomes and pregnancy outcome related to clinical features were analyzed retrospectively. Analysis revealed that the placement of emergency cerclage led to the delivery of live infants with a success rate of 82.28%. The mean interval between cerclage and delivery was 52.16.±26.62 days, with a mean gestation at delivery of 30.3±4.7 weeks and a mean birth weight of 1934.69±570.37 g. No severe maternal complications such as maternal death, hematosepsis, and hysterorrhexis occurred after the operation. Two women (1.25%) had laceration of the cervix, 1 woman (0.61%) suffered pulmonary edema, and 2 women (1.25%) developed deep vein thrombosis (DVT). There were significant correlations between the pregnancy outcome and risk factors, including any presenting symptoms, cervical dilatation, postoperative white blood cell count, and C-reactive protein (CRP) value. No significant difference was found in women with good vs. poor outcome in terms of maternal age and obstetric histories. Emergency cervical cerclage is effective in prolonging pregnancy and improving neonatal outcome in women with cervical incompetence. It should be considered a viable option for women with a dilated cervix in mid-trimester.

摘要

本研究的目的是评估紧急宫颈环扎术对宫颈扩张且胎膜膨出的女性的有效性和安全性。该研究纳入了158例因孕中期宫颈扩张和胎膜膨出而接受紧急宫颈环扎术的女性,这些女性来自中山大学孙逸仙纪念医院。对妊娠结局以及与临床特征相关的妊娠结果进行了回顾性分析。分析显示,紧急环扎术使活产婴儿的分娩成功率达到82.28%。环扎术至分娩的平均间隔时间为52.16±26.62天,分娩时的平均孕周为30.3±4.7周,平均出生体重为1934.69±570.37克。术后未发生严重的母体并发症,如产妇死亡、败血症和子宫破裂。2名女性(1.25%)发生宫颈裂伤,1名女性(0.61%)出现肺水肿,2名女性(1.25%)发生深静脉血栓形成(DVT)。妊娠结局与危险因素之间存在显著相关性,这些危险因素包括任何出现的症状、宫颈扩张、术后白细胞计数和C反应蛋白(CRP)值。在产妇年龄和产科病史方面,妊娠结局良好与不良的女性之间未发现显著差异。紧急宫颈环扎术对于延长宫颈机能不全女性的孕周和改善新生儿结局是有效的。对于孕中期宫颈扩张的女性,应将其视为一种可行的选择。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e6a/4444177/1d480ec41f2d/medscimonit-21-1395-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e6a/4444177/c1982750e56e/medscimonit-21-1395-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e6a/4444177/5dc710370fca/medscimonit-21-1395-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e6a/4444177/1d480ec41f2d/medscimonit-21-1395-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e6a/4444177/c1982750e56e/medscimonit-21-1395-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e6a/4444177/5dc710370fca/medscimonit-21-1395-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e6a/4444177/1d480ec41f2d/medscimonit-21-1395-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Effects of emergency cervical cerclage on pregnancy outcome: a retrospective study of 158 cases.紧急宫颈环扎术对妊娠结局的影响:一项158例病例的回顾性研究
Med Sci Monit. 2015 May 15;21:1395-401. doi: 10.12659/MSM.893244.
2
The effect of second trimester emergency cervical cerclage on perinatal outcome.孕中期紧急宫颈环扎术对围产期结局的影响。
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2012 Sep;25(9):1746-9. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2012.663822. Epub 2012 Apr 3.
3
Emergency cerclage in the presence of protruding membranes: is pregnancy outcome predictable?胎膜突出情况下的紧急宫颈环扎术:妊娠结局可预测吗?
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2000 Apr;79(4):265-8.
4
[Emergency cervical cerclage during mid-trimester of pregnancy: Experience of Clermont-Ferrand].[妊娠中期紧急宫颈环扎术:克莱蒙费朗的经验]
Gynecol Obstet Fertil. 2011 Nov;39(11):609-13. doi: 10.1016/j.gyobfe.2011.07.016. Epub 2011 Aug 26.
5
Emergency cervical cerclage: relation between its success, preoperative serum level of C-reactive protein and WBC count, and degree of cervical dilatation.紧急宫颈环扎术:其成功率、术前血清C反应蛋白水平和白细胞计数以及宫颈扩张程度之间的关系。
Gynecol Obstet Invest. 1999;47(3):157-61. doi: 10.1159/000010084.
6
Emergency cervical cerclage. Does the gestational age make a difference?紧急宫颈环扎术。孕周会有影响吗?
Saudi Med J. 2004 Aug;25(8):1028-31.
7
Results of midtrimester emergency cerclage.孕中期紧急宫颈环扎术的结果
J Reprod Med. 2013 Mar-Apr;58(3-4):143-8.
8
Outcomes of mid-trimester emergency cerclage in twin pregnancies.双胎妊娠中孕期紧急宫颈环扎术的结局。
Fetal Diagn Ther. 2012;32(4):246-50. doi: 10.1159/000338734. Epub 2012 Aug 22.
9
Outcome of second-trimester, emergency cervical cerclage in patients with no history of cervical incompetence.无宫颈机能不全病史患者孕中期紧急宫颈环扎术的结局
Am J Perinatol. 1996 Oct;13(7):419-22. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-994381.
10
Pregnancy outcome after placement of 'rescue' Shirodkar cerclage.放置“挽救性”希罗德卡尔宫颈环扎术后的妊娠结局
J Perinatol. 2009 Apr;29(4):276-9. doi: 10.1038/jp.2008.221. Epub 2009 Jan 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Outcomes of emergency cervical cerclage after amnioreduction in twin pregnancies with a fully dilated cervix and amniotic membrane prolapse.宫颈完全扩张且羊膜脱垂的双胎妊娠行羊水减量术后紧急宫颈环扎术的结局
J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc. 2025 Mar 12;26(1):26-33. doi: 10.4274/jtgga.galenos.2024.2024-9-9.
2
Predictive Value of First Amniotic Sac IL-6 and Maternal Blood CRP for Emergency Cerclage Success in Twin Pregnancies.首次羊膜囊白细胞介素-6和母体血液C反应蛋白对双胎妊娠紧急宫颈环扎术成功的预测价值
J Pers Med. 2025 Jan 19;15(1):37. doi: 10.3390/jpm15010037.
3
Rescue Cervical Cerclage for Previable Birth Prevention: A Comprehensive Review of Indications, Techniques, and Outcomes.

本文引用的文献

1
Diagnosis of subclinical amniotic fluid infection prior to rescue cerclage using gram stain and glucose tests: an individual patient meta-analysis.使用革兰氏染色和葡萄糖检测在紧急宫颈环扎术前诊断亚临床羊水感染:一项个体患者荟萃分析。
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2014 Feb;36(2):116-122. doi: 10.1016/S1701-2163(15)30656-3.
2
Pathogenesis implication for necrotizing enterocolitis prevention in preterm very-low-birth-weight infants.坏死性小肠结肠炎预防对早产儿极低出生体重儿发病机制的意义。
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2014 Jan;58(1):7-11. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0b013e3182a7dc74.
3
A review of the contemporary evidence on rescue cervical cerclage.
用于预防可存活前分娩的挽救性宫颈环扎术:适应症、技术及结局的全面综述
Cureus. 2024 Sep 4;16(9):e68619. doi: 10.7759/cureus.68619. eCollection 2024 Sep.
4
The association between the degree of cervical dilatation before ultrasound and physical examination indicated cerclage and subsequent neonatal outcomes.超声检查前宫颈扩张程度与体格检查之间的关联提示了宫颈环扎术及随后的新生儿结局。
Qatar Med J. 2024 Apr 4;2024(1):20. doi: 10.5339/qmj.2024.20. eCollection 2024.
5
Development and validation of models for predicting preterm birth and gestational latency following emergency cervical cerclage: A multicenter cohort study.预测紧急宫颈环扎术后早产和潜伏期的模型的开发和验证:一项多中心队列研究。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2024 May;103(5):917-926. doi: 10.1111/aogs.14758. Epub 2023 Dec 25.
6
A nomogram for predicting prognosis of patients with cervical cerclage.预测宫颈环扎术患者预后的列线图。
Heliyon. 2023 Oct 18;9(11):e21147. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e21147. eCollection 2023 Nov.
7
Role of body mass index in pregnancy outcomes after emergency cerclage for cervical insufficiency in singleton pregnant patients.BMI 在单胎妊娠患者因宫颈机能不全行紧急宫颈环扎术后妊娠结局中的作用。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023 Sep 7;23(1):645. doi: 10.1186/s12884-023-05974-y.
8
Correlation Between Clinical Factors and Pregnancy Outcome Following Repeat Cerclage: A Retrospective Analysis of a Chinese Population.重复宫颈环扎术后临床因素与妊娠结局的相关性:一项中国人群的回顾性分析
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Apr 4;9:846755. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.846755. eCollection 2022.
9
Comparison of Outcomes Following General Anesthesia and Spinal Anesthesia During Emergency Cervical Cerclage in Singleton Pregnant Women in the Second Trimester at a Single Center.单中心单胎妊娠中孕期紧急宫颈环扎术全麻与脊麻效果比较。
Med Sci Monit. 2022 Mar 7;28:e934771. doi: 10.12659/MSM.934771.
10
Amnioreduction in Emergency Rescue Cervical Cerclage with Bulging Membranes.紧急宫颈环扎伴胎膜膨出时的羊水减量术。
Med Arch. 2020 Apr;74(2):151-152. doi: 10.5455/medarh.2020.74.151-152.
关于紧急宫颈环扎术的当代证据综述。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2014 Mar;124(3):198-203. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2013.08.021. Epub 2013 Dec 4.
4
Impaired neural conduction in the auditory brainstem of high-risk very preterm infants.高危极早产儿听觉脑干神经传导受损。
Clin Neurophysiol. 2014 Jun;125(6):1231-7. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2013.11.012. Epub 2013 Nov 27.
5
Emergency cerclage versus expectant management for prolapsed fetal membranes: a retrospective, comparative study.胎膜早破的紧急宫颈环扎术与期待疗法:一项回顾性比较研究。
J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2014 Feb;40(2):381-6. doi: 10.1111/jog.12207. Epub 2013 Oct 22.
6
Use of cervical cerclage as a treatment option for cervical incompetence: patient characteristics, presentation and management over a 9 year period in a Kenyan centre.宫颈环扎术作为宫颈机能不全治疗选择的应用:肯尼亚一家中心9年期间的患者特征、临床表现及管理
Afr J Reprod Health. 2013 Mar;17(1):169-73.
7
[Advances in medical care for extremely low birth weight infants worldwide].[全球极低出生体重儿医疗护理的进展]
Zhongguo Dang Dai Er Ke Za Zhi. 2013 Aug;15(8):703-7.
8
Outcomes of pregnancy in women who had rescue cerclage for cervical insufficiency: a single-center retrospective study.因宫颈机能不全接受补救性宫颈环扎术的女性的妊娠结局:一项单中心回顾性研究
J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2013 Aug;39(8):1293-300. doi: 10.1111/jog.12059. Epub 2013 Jun 26.
9
Severe brain damage in premature infants associated with postnatal infection.早产儿的严重脑损伤与产后感染有关。
Minerva Med. 2013 Jun;104(3):349-55.
10
Emergency cervical cerclage: effect on pregnancy outcome and mode of delivery.紧急宫颈环扎术:对妊娠结局和分娩方式的影响。
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2014 Jan;27(1):80-3. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2013.805196. Epub 2013 Jun 20.