Department of Psychology, Georgia Institute of Technology.
Department of Psychology, Colby College.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2020 Jan;46(1):140-154. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000705. Epub 2019 Jun 6.
This study uses a novel framework based on work by Shipstead, Harrison, and Engle (2016) that includes measures of both working memory capacity and fluid intelligence in an attempt to better understand the processes that influence successful reading comprehension at the latent level. Further, we extend this framework to a second educationally relevant ability: second-language vocabulary learning. A large sample of young adults received a battery of working memory, fluid intelligence, language comprehension, and memory updating tasks. The results indicate that individual differences in reading comprehension and vocabulary learning benefit from the ability to maintain active information, as well as to disengage from no longer relevant information. Subsequently, we provide an interpretation of our results based on the maintenance and disengagement framework proposed by Shipstead et al. (2016). (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).
本研究使用了一种基于 Shipstead、Harrison 和 Engle(2016)工作的新框架,其中包括工作记忆容量和流体智力的测量,试图更好地理解在潜在水平上影响成功阅读理解的过程。此外,我们将该框架扩展到第二个教育相关的能力:第二语言词汇学习。一大群年轻人接受了一系列工作记忆、流体智力、语言理解和记忆更新任务。结果表明,阅读理解和词汇学习的个体差异得益于保持活跃信息的能力,以及摆脱不再相关信息的能力。随后,我们根据 Shipstead 等人(2016)提出的维持和脱离框架对结果进行了解释。(PsycINFO 数据库记录(c)2019 APA,保留所有权利)。