• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Modern Assessments of Intelligence Must Be Fair and Equitable.现代智力评估必须公平公正。
J Intell. 2023 Jun 20;11(6):126. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence11060126.
2
Fairness of artificial intelligence in healthcare: review and recommendations.人工智能在医疗保健中的公平性:综述与建议。
Jpn J Radiol. 2024 Jan;42(1):3-15. doi: 10.1007/s11604-023-01474-3. Epub 2023 Aug 4.
3
Artificial Intelligence and Cancer Control: Toward Prioritizing Justice, Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion (JEDI) in Emerging Decision Support Technologies.人工智能与癌症防控:新兴决策支持技术中优先考虑公正、公平、多样性和包容性(JEDI)
Curr Oncol Rep. 2023 May;25(5):387-424. doi: 10.1007/s11912-023-01376-7. Epub 2023 Feb 22.
4
PASS Theory of Intelligence and Its Measurement Using the Cognitive Assessment System, 2nd Edition.《智力的PASS理论及其使用认知评估系统的测量(第二版)》
J Intell. 2024 Aug 6;12(8):77. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence12080077.
5
Developing Ethics and Equity Principles, Terms, and Engagement Tools to Advance Health Equity and Researcher Diversity in AI and Machine Learning: Modified Delphi Approach.制定伦理与公平原则、术语及参与工具,以促进人工智能和机器学习领域的健康公平及研究人员多样性:改良德尔菲法
JMIR AI. 2023 Dec 6;2:e52888. doi: 10.2196/52888.
6
Empowering nurses to champion Health equity & BE FAIR: Bias elimination for fair and responsible AI in healthcare.赋予护士权力,倡导健康公平并做到公平公正:消除医疗保健中人工智能的偏见,实现公平且负责任的人工智能。
J Nurs Scholarsh. 2025 Jan;57(1):130-139. doi: 10.1111/jnu.13007. Epub 2024 Jul 29.
7
Equitable data sharing in epidemics and pandemics.传染病和大流行中的公平数据共享。
BMC Med Ethics. 2021 Oct 6;22(1):136. doi: 10.1186/s12910-021-00701-8.
8
What does equity in health mean?健康公平意味着什么?
World Health Stat Q. 1987;40(4):296-303.
9
Sponsorship in Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery: A Pathway to Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion.耳鼻喉头颈外科学会的赞助:实现公平、多样性和包容性的途径。
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2023 Jun 1;149(6):546-552. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2023.0770.
10
Australia in 2030: what is our path to health for all?2030 年的澳大利亚:全民健康之路在何方?
Med J Aust. 2021 May;214 Suppl 8:S5-S40. doi: 10.5694/mja2.51020.

引用本文的文献

1
Cognitive Function in Peri- and Postmenopausal Women: Implications for Considering Iron Supplementation.围绝经期和绝经后女性的认知功能:对考虑补充铁剂的启示
Nutrients. 2025 May 23;17(11):1762. doi: 10.3390/nu17111762.
2
The Relationship Between Game-Related Assessment and Traditional Measures of Cognitive Ability-A Meta-Analysis.游戏相关评估与传统认知能力测量之间的关系——一项元分析
J Intell. 2024 Dec 16;12(12):129. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence12120129.
3
Validation of Hamdan intelligence scale in upper elementary grades using the Rasch model: exploratory study.使用拉施模型对上小学高年级学生进行哈姆丹智力量表的验证:探索性研究。
Front Psychol. 2024 Aug 30;15:1407734. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1407734. eCollection 2024.
4
Assessment of Human Intelligence-The State of the Art in the 2020s.人类智力评估——21世纪20年代的最新进展
J Intell. 2024 Jul 27;12(8):72. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence12080072.
5
Intelligence Assessment of Children & Youth Benefiting from Psychological-Educational Support System in Poland.波兰儿童和青少年受益于心理教育支持系统的智力评估。
Sci Data. 2024 Jul 27;11(1):826. doi: 10.1038/s41597-024-03663-9.
6
Relationship between Thinking Dispositions, Working Memory, and Critical Thinking Ability in Adolescents: A Longitudinal Cross-Lagged Analysis.青少年思维倾向、工作记忆与批判性思维能力之间的关系:一项纵向交叉滞后分析。
J Intell. 2024 May 21;12(6):52. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence12060052.
7
Contextualizing Positionality, Intersectionality, and Intelligence in the Anthropocene.将人类世中的位置性、交叉性和智力置于情境中
J Intell. 2024 Apr 17;12(4):45. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence12040045.
8
Applying the Discrepancy Consistency Method on CAS-2: Brief Data in a Sample of Greek-Speaking Children.在CAS-2上应用差异一致性方法:希腊语儿童样本中的简要数据
J Intell. 2024 Apr 5;12(4):43. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence12040043.
9
Racial and ethnic disparities in psychological care for individuals with FASD: a dis/ability studies and critical race theory perspective toward improving prevention, assessment/diagnosis, and intervention.种族和民族差异对患有胎儿酒精谱系障碍个体的心理护理:改善预防、评估/诊断和干预的残疾研究和批判种族理论视角。
Front Public Health. 2024 Mar 13;12:1355802. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1355802. eCollection 2024.
10
The Intellectual Profile of Adults with Specific Learning Disabilities.患有特定学习障碍的成年人的智力概况。
J Intell. 2023 Dec 9;11(12):223. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence11120223.

本文引用的文献

1
The Structure of Cognitive Abilities and Associations with Problem Behaviors in Early Adolescence: An Analysis of Baseline Data from the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development Study.青少年早期认知能力的结构及其与问题行为的关联:来自青少年大脑认知发展研究的基线数据分析
J Intell. 2023 May 10;11(5):90. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence11050090.
2
Carroll's Three-Stratum (3S) Cognitive Ability Theory at 30 Years: Impact, 3S-CHC Theory Clarification, Structural Replication, and Cognitive-Achievement Psychometric Network Analysis Extension.卡罗尔三层次(3S)认知能力理论30年回顾:影响、3S-CHC理论阐释、结构复制及认知成就心理测量网络分析扩展
J Intell. 2023 Feb 6;11(2):32. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence11020032.
3
A Psychometric Network Analysis of CHC Intelligence Measures: Implications for Research, Theory, and Interpretation of Broad CHC Scores "Beyond ".CHC智力测验的心理测量网络分析:对“超越”广义CHC分数的研究、理论及解释的启示
J Intell. 2023 Jan 16;11(1):19. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence11010019.
4
Consideration of culture in cognition: How we can enrich methodology and theory.考虑认知中的文化:我们如何丰富方法和理论。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2023 Jun;30(3):914-931. doi: 10.3758/s13423-022-02227-5. Epub 2022 Dec 12.
5
Developmental behavioral genetics research on school achievement is missing vulnerable children, to our detriment.发展行为遗传学对学业成就的研究忽略了弱势儿童,这对我们不利。
New Dir Child Adolesc Dev. 2022 Jul;2022(183-184):47-55. doi: 10.1002/cad.20485. Epub 2022 Sep 26.
6
Central executive training for ADHD: Effects on academic achievement, productivity, and success in the classroom.ADHD 中枢执行功能训练:对学业成绩、生产力和课堂成功的影响。
Neuropsychology. 2022 May;36(4):330-345. doi: 10.1037/neu0000798. Epub 2022 Mar 28.
7
Intelligence Can Be Used to Make a More Equitable Society but Only When Properly Defined and Applied.智慧能够用来创造一个更加公平的社会,但前提是要得到恰当的定义和应用。
J Intell. 2021 Nov 25;9(4):57. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence9040057.
8
The Cultural Foundation of Human Memory.人类记忆的文化基础。
Annu Rev Psychol. 2021 Jan 4;72:151-179. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-070920-023638. Epub 2020 Sep 14.
9
Cultural differences in performance on Eriksen's flanker task.在埃里森侧抑制任务中的表现存在文化差异。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2021 Feb;83(2):882-898. doi: 10.3758/s13414-020-02117-9.
10
Racial Inequality in Psychological Research: Trends of the Past and Recommendations for the Future.心理学研究中的种族不平等:过去的趋势与未来的建议。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2020 Nov;15(6):1295-1309. doi: 10.1177/1745691620927709. Epub 2020 Jun 24.

现代智力评估必须公平公正。

Modern Assessments of Intelligence Must Be Fair and Equitable.

作者信息

Holden LaTasha R, Tanenbaum Gabriel J

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, IL 61820, USA.

Beckman Institute, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA.

出版信息

J Intell. 2023 Jun 20;11(6):126. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence11060126.

DOI:10.3390/jintelligence11060126
PMID:37367528
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10301777/
Abstract

Historically, assessments of human intelligence have been virtually synonymous with practices that contributed to forms of inequality and injustice. As such, modern considerations for assessing human intelligence must focus on equity and fairness. First, we highlight the array of diversity, equity, and inclusion concerns in assessment practices and discuss strategies for addressing them. Next, we define a modern, non-, emergent view of intelligence using the process overlap theory and argue for its use in improving equitable practices. We then review the empirical evidence, focusing on sub-measures of to highlight the utility of non-, emergent models in promoting equity and fairness. We conclude with suggestions for researchers and practitioners.

摘要

从历史上看,对人类智力的评估实际上一直与导致不平等和不公正形式的做法同义。因此,现代对人类智力评估的考量必须关注公平和公正。首先,我们强调评估实践中一系列的多样性、公平性和包容性问题,并讨论解决这些问题的策略。接下来,我们使用过程重叠理论定义一种现代的、非传统的、新兴的智力观,并主张将其用于改进公平实践。然后,我们回顾实证证据,重点关注……的子测量方法,以突出非传统、新兴模型在促进公平和公正方面的效用。我们最后为研究人员和从业者提出建议。 (原文中“focusing on sub-measures of ”后面内容缺失)