Marukutira Tafireyi, Yin Dwight, Cressman Laura, Kariuki Ruth, Malone Brighid, Spelman Tim, Mawandia Shreshth, Ledikwe Jenny H, Semo Bazghina-Werq, Crowe Suzanne, Stoove Mark, Hellard Margaret, Dickinson Diana
Burnet Institute.
Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Jun;98(23):e15994. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000015994.
The aim of the study was to evaluate the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) treatment cascade and mortality in migrants and citizens living with HIV in Botswana.Retrospective 2002 to 2016 cohort study using electronic medical records from a single center managing a high migrant case load.Records for 768 migrants and 3274 citizens living with HIV were included. Maipelo Trust, a nongovernmental organization, funded care for most migrants (70%); most citizens (85%) had personal health insurance. Seventy percent of migrants and 93% of citizens had received antiretroviral therapy (ART). At study end, 44% and 27% of migrants and citizens, respectively were retained in care at the clinic (P < .001). Among the 35% and 60% of migrants and citizens on ART respectively with viral load (VL) results in 2016, viral suppression was lower among migrants (82%) than citizens (95%) (P < .001). Citizens on ART had a median 157-unit [95% confidence interval (CI) 122-192] greater increase in CD4+ T-cell count (last minus first recorded count) than migrants after adjusting for baseline count (P < .001). Five-year survival was 92% (95% CI = 87.6-94.8) for migrants and 96% (95% CI = 95.4-97.2) for citizens. Migrants had higher mortality than citizens after entry into care (hazard ratio = 2.3, 95% CI = 1.34-3.89, P = .002) and ART initiation (hazard ratio = 2.2, 95% CI = 1.24-3.78, P = .01).Fewer migrants than citizens living with HIV in Botswana were on ART, accessed VL monitoring, achieved viral suppression, and survived. The HIV treatment cascade appears suboptimal for migrants, undermining local 90-90-90 targets. These results highlight the need to include migrants in mainstream-funded HIV treatment programs, as microepidemics can slow HIV epidemic control.
该研究的目的是评估博茨瓦纳感染人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)的移民和公民的HIV治疗流程及死亡率。利用来自一个管理大量移民病例的单一中心的电子病历进行2002年至2016年的回顾性队列研究。纳入了768名感染HIV的移民和3274名感染HIV的公民的记录。一个非政府组织Maipelo信托基金为大多数移民(70%)提供医疗资助;大多数公民(85%)有个人健康保险。70%的移民和93%的公民接受了抗逆转录病毒疗法(ART)。在研究结束时,分别有44%的移民和27%的公民在诊所接受持续治疗(P<0.001)。在2016年分别有35%的移民和60%的公民接受ART且有病毒载量(VL)检测结果,移民中的病毒抑制率(82%)低于公民(95%)(P<0.001)。在调整基线计数后,接受ART的公民的CD4+T细胞计数中位数(末次记录计数减去首次记录计数)比移民高157个单位[95%置信区间(CI)为122 - 192](P<0.001)。移民的五年生存率为92%(95%CI = 87.6 - 94.8),公民为96%(95%CI = 95.4 - 97.2)。在开始接受治疗后(风险比 = 2.3,95%CI = 1.34 - 3.89,P = 0.002)以及开始接受ART后(风险比 = 2.2,95%CI = 1.24 - 3.78,P = 0.01),移民的死亡率高于公民。在博茨瓦纳,感染HIV的移民中接受ART、进行VL监测、实现病毒抑制以及存活的人数均少于公民。HIV治疗流程对移民而言似乎并不理想,这不利于当地90 - 90 - 90目标的实现。这些结果凸显了将移民纳入主流资助的HIV治疗项目的必要性,因为小规模流行可能会减缓HIV疫情的控制。