Suppr超能文献

小儿骨科医生在诊断和治疗儿童及青少年桡骨远端骨折时的差异

Variation Among Pediatric Orthopaedic Surgeons When Diagnosing and Treating Pediatric and Adolescent Distal Radius Fractures.

作者信息

Dua Karan, Stein Matthew K, O'Hara Nathan N, Brighton Brian K, Hennrikus William L, Herman Martin J, Lawrence J Todd, Mehlman Charles T, Otsuka Norman Y, Shrader M Wade, Smith Brian G, Sponseller Paul D, Abzug Joshua M

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedics, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Carolinas Healthcare System/Levine Children's Hospital, Charlotte, NC.

出版信息

J Pediatr Orthop. 2019 Jul;39(6):306-313. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000000954.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Distal radius fractures are the most common injury in the pediatric population. The purpose of this study was to determine the variation among pediatric orthopaedic surgeons when diagnosing and treating distal radius fractures.

METHODS

Nine pediatric orthopaedic surgeons reviewed 100 sets of wrist radiographs and were asked to describe the fracture, prescribe the type of treatment and length of immobilization, and determine the next follow-up visit. κ statistics were performed to assess the agreement with the chance agreement removed.

RESULTS

Only fair agreement was present when diagnosing and classifying the distal radius fractures (κ=0.379). There was poor agreement regarding the type of treatment that would be recommended (κ=0.059). There was no agreement regarding the length of immobilization (κ=-0.004).Poor agreement was also present regarding when the first follow-up visit should occur (κ=0.088), whether or not new radiographs should be obtained at the first follow-up visit (κ=0.133), and if radiographs were necessary at the final follow-up visit (κ=0.163). Surgeons had fair agreement regarding stability of the fracture (κ=0.320).A subgroup analysis comparing various traits of the treatment immobilization showed providers only had a slight level of agreement on whether splint or cast immobilization should be used (κ=0.072). There was poor agreement regarding whether long-arm or short-arm immobilization should be prescribed (κ=-0.067).Twenty-three of the 100 radiographs were diagnosed as a torus/buckle fracture by all 9 surgeons. κ analysis performed on all the treatment and management questions showed that each query had poor agreement.

CONCLUSIONS

The interobserver reliability of diagnosing pediatric distal radius fractures showed only fair agreement. This study demonstrates that there is no standardization regarding how to treat these fractures and the length of immobilization required for proper fracture healing. Better classification systems of distal radius fractures are needed that standardize the treatment of these injuries.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II.

摘要

背景

桡骨远端骨折是儿科人群中最常见的损伤。本研究的目的是确定儿科骨科医生在诊断和治疗桡骨远端骨折时的差异。

方法

九位儿科骨科医生查看了100套腕部X光片,并被要求描述骨折情况,开出治疗类型和固定时长的医嘱,并确定下次随访时间。进行κ统计以评估去除机遇一致性后的一致性。

结果

在诊断和分类桡骨远端骨折时仅存在中等程度的一致性(κ=0.379)。对于推荐的治疗类型,一致性较差(κ=0.059)。在固定时长方面没有一致性(κ=-0.004)。对于首次随访时间(κ=0.088)、首次随访时是否应获取新的X光片(κ=0.133)以及末次随访时是否需要X光片(κ=0.163),一致性也较差。医生们在骨折稳定性方面有中等程度的一致性(κ=0.320)。一项比较治疗固定各种特征的亚组分析显示,医疗人员在应使用夹板还是石膏固定方面仅有轻微的一致性(κ=0.072)。在应开具长臂还是短臂固定方面,一致性较差(κ=-0.067)。100张X光片中的23张被所有9位医生诊断为青枝骨折。对所有治疗和管理问题进行的κ分析表明,每个问题的一致性都较差。

结论

诊断儿科桡骨远端骨折的观察者间可靠性仅显示出中等程度的一致性。本研究表明,在如何治疗这些骨折以及骨折正确愈合所需的固定时长方面没有标准化。需要更好的桡骨远端骨折分类系统来规范这些损伤的治疗。

证据级别

二级。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验