Ethics of inclusion: Cultivate trust in precision medicine.
作者信息
Lee Sandra Soo-Jin, Fullerton Stephanie M, Saperstein Aliya, Shim Janet K
机构信息
Division of Ethics, Department of Medical Humanities and Ethics, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Department of Bioethics and Humanities, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
出版信息
Science. 2019 Jun 7;364(6444):941-942. doi: 10.1126/science.aaw8299.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Ethics of inclusion: Cultivate trust in precision medicine.纳入伦理：培养对精准医学的信任。
Science. 2019 Jun 7;364(6444):941-942. doi: 10.1126/science.aaw8299.
2
Beyond Consent: Building Trusting Relationships With Diverse Populations in Precision Medicine Research.超越同意：在精准医学研究中与不同人群建立信任关系。
Am J Bioeth. 2018 Apr;18(4):3-20. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2018.1431322.
3
Tensions in ethics and policy created by National Precision Medicine Programs.国家精准医学计划引发的伦理和政策紧张局势。
Hum Genomics. 2018 Apr 17;12(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s40246-018-0151-9.
4
Difficulties and challenges in the development of precision medicine.精准医学发展面临的困难与挑战。
Clin Genet. 2019 May;95(5):569-574. doi: 10.1111/cge.13511. Epub 2019 Feb 14.
5
Patients' Trust as Fundament for Research Ethics Boards.患者信任是研究伦理委员会的基础。
Am J Bioeth. 2018 Apr;18(4):42-44. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2018.1431713.
6
Should we sequence everyone's genome? Yes.我们应该对每个人的基因组进行测序吗？答案是肯定的。
BMJ. 2013 May 21;346:f3133. doi: 10.1136/bmj.f3133.
7
Patient Perspectives on the Learning Health System: The Importance of Trust and Shared Decision Making.患者对学习型健康系统的看法：信任和共同决策的重要性。
Am J Bioeth. 2015;15(9):4-17. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2015.1062163.
8
Precision medicine ethics: selected issues and developments in next-generation sequencing, clinical oncology, and ethics.精准医学伦理：下一代测序、临床肿瘤学及伦理方面的特定问题与进展
Curr Opin Oncol. 2016 Jan;28(1):83-7. doi: 10.1097/CCO.0000000000000247.
9
The power of persuasion.说服力。
Narrat Inq Bioeth. 2013 Fall;3(2):101-3. doi: 10.1353/nib.2013.0030.
10
The Use of Racial Categories in Precision Medicine Research.种族类别在精准医学研究中的应用。
Ethn Dis. 2019 Dec 12;29(Suppl 3):651-658. doi: 10.18865/ed.29.S3.651. eCollection 2019.
引用本文的文献
1
Bridging Health Disparity Gaps in Alzheimer's Disease among Marginalized Populations: Clinical Proteomics as a Case Study.弥合边缘化人群中阿尔茨海默病的健康差距：以临床蛋白质组学为例
ACS Bio Med Chem Au. 2025 Jul 8;5(4):505-518. doi: 10.1021/acsbiomedchemau.5c00074. eCollection 2025 Aug 20.
2
A qualitative study of diversity in precision medicine research: The development and stakeholder assessment of a Diversity Decision Map.精准医学研究中的多样性定性研究：多样性决策图的开发与利益相关者评估
J Clin Transl Sci. 2025 Mar 18;9(1):e78. doi: 10.1017/cts.2025.45. eCollection 2025.
3
Identifying High-Priority Ethical Challenges for Precision Emergency Medicine: Nominal Group Study.确定精准急诊医学的高度优先伦理挑战：名义群体研究
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Feb 6;9:e68371. doi: 10.2196/68371.
4
Empowering Healthcare through Precision Medicine: Unveiling the Nexus of Social Factors and Trust.通过精准医疗增强医疗保健能力：揭示社会因素与信任的关系。
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Dec 15;11(24):3177. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11243177.
5
A Conference (Missingness in Action) to Address Missingness in Data and AI in Health Care: Qualitative Thematic Analysis.会议（行动中的缺失）旨在解决医疗保健数据和人工智能中的缺失问题：定性主题分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Nov 23;25:e49314. doi: 10.2196/49314.
6
Innovating for a Just and Equitable Future in Genomic and Precision Medicine Research.为基因组与精准医学研究的公正平等未来而创新。
Am J Bioeth. 2023 Jul;23(7):1-4. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2023.2215201.
7
Unbounding ELSI: The Ongoing Work of Centering Equity and Justice.无限的伦理、法律和社会影响：以公平和正义为核心的持续工作。
Am J Bioeth. 2023 Jul;23(7):103-105. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2023.2214055.
8
Demographic Characteristics Associated With Perceptions of Personal Utility in Genetic and Genomic Testing: A Systematic Review.与遗传和基因组检测中个人效用感知相关的人口统计学特征：系统评价。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 May 1;6(5):e2310367. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.10367.
9
Pharmacogenomics and health disparities, are we helping?药物基因组学与健康差异，我们是否有所助益？
Front Genet. 2023 Jan 23;14:1099541. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2023.1099541. eCollection 2023.
10
Balancing the safeguarding of privacy and data sharing: perceptions of genomic professionals on patient genomic data ownership in Australia.平衡隐私保护和数据共享：澳大利亚基因组专业人员对患者基因组数据所有权的看法。
Eur J Hum Genet. 2024 May;32(5):506-512. doi: 10.1038/s41431-022-01273-w. Epub 2023 Jan 11.
本文引用的文献
1
ASHG Denounces Attempts to Link Genetics and Racial Supremacy.美国人类遗传学会谴责将遗传学与种族优越论联系起来的企图。
Am J Hum Genet. 2018 Nov 1;103(5):636. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2018.10.011. Epub 2018 Oct 19.
2
Enhancing diversity to reduce health information disparities and build an evidence base for genomic medicine.增强多样性以减少健康信息差距并为基因组医学建立证据基础。
Per Med. 2018 Sep;15(5):403-412. doi: 10.2217/pme-2018-0037. Epub 2018 Sep 13.
3
Beyond Consent: Building Trusting Relationships With Diverse Populations in Precision Medicine Research.超越同意：在精准医学研究中与不同人群建立信任关系。
Am J Bioeth. 2018 Apr;18(4):3-20. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2018.1431322.
4
Genomics is failing on diversity.基因组学在多样性方面表现不佳。
Nature. 2016 Oct 13;538(7624):161-164. doi: 10.1038/538161a.
5
Race and ancestry in the age of inclusion: technique and meaning in post-genomic science.包容时代的种族与血统：后基因组科学中的技术与意义
J Health Soc Behav. 2014 Dec;55(4):504-18. doi: 10.1177/0022146514555224. Epub 2014 Nov 6.
6
Genetic ancestry, social classification, and racial inequalities in blood pressure in Southeastern Puerto Rico.波多黎各东南部的遗传血统、社会分类和血压的种族不平等。
PLoS One. 2009 Sep 9;4(9):e6821. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0006821.
7
Genetics. The illusive gold standard in genetic ancestry testing.遗传学。基因血统检测中难以捉摸的金标准。
Science. 2009 Jul 3;325(5936):38-9. doi: 10.1126/science.1173038.
8
Using "socially assigned race" to probe white advantages in health status.使用“社会赋予的种族”来探究白人在健康状况方面的优势。
Ethn Dis. 2008 Autumn;18(4):496-504.
9
The use of race variables in genetic studies of complex traits and the goal of reducing health disparities: a transdisciplinary perspective.复杂性状基因研究中种族变量的使用与减少健康差距的目标：跨学科视角
Am Psychol. 2005 Jan;60(1):77-103. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.60.1.77.
Zotero 插件