Health Organisation, Policy and Economics, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Williamson Building, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.
Division of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Care, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Pharmacoeconomics. 2021 Nov;39(11):1209-1223. doi: 10.1007/s40273-021-01053-2. Epub 2021 Jul 29.
Economic evaluations increasingly include the value of informal care, for example, in terms of caregiver health effects or time costs. If an economic evaluation uses caregiving time costs, appropriate measurement of caregiving time is an important first step prior to its valuation. There is no comprehensive overview of the measurement challenges for caregiving time. In this literature review, we searched Medline, Embase, Econlit and Scopus to identify measurement issues and associated studies which reported informal care time that addressed them. The search identified 27 studies that addressed nine measurement issues. There is limited evidence on how to address these issues, although some have received relatively more attention, including incremental time (considered in 16 studies), time measurement method comparisons (six studies) and the inclusion of intangible tasks (four studies). Non-response (considered in only one study) and carer and recipient identification (two studies) were the most wide-reaching measurement concerns, as these determine who is identified as carers. There was no evidence on the consequences of these measurement challenges in terms of impacts on cost-effectiveness ratios and on the total cost of health conditions, which would be a crucial next step. Future research on these issues should consider a range of different settings, as informal care is highly heterogeneous. The measurement of informal care is key for its inclusion in economic evaluations but there is little consensus on how to appropriately measure this type of care.
经济评估越来越多地包括非正式护理的价值,例如,从护理人员健康影响或时间成本方面考虑。如果经济评估使用护理时间成本,那么在对其进行估值之前,对护理时间进行适当的测量是重要的第一步。目前还没有对护理时间测量挑战的综合概述。在本次文献综述中,我们检索了 Medline、Embase、Econlit 和 Scopus,以确定与报告解决这些问题的非正式护理时间相关的测量问题和研究。搜索共确定了 27 项研究,涉及九个测量问题。尽管有些问题受到了相对较多的关注,例如增量时间(在 16 项研究中考虑)、时间测量方法比较(6 项研究)和无形任务的纳入(4 项研究),但如何解决这些问题的证据有限。非响应(仅在一项研究中考虑)和护理人员及接受者的识别(两项研究)是最广泛的测量问题,因为这决定了谁被确定为护理人员。关于这些测量挑战对成本效益比和卫生条件总成本的影响方面的证据,这将是至关重要的下一步。未来对这些问题的研究应考虑一系列不同的环境,因为非正式护理具有高度异质性。非正式护理的测量对于将其纳入经济评估至关重要,但如何适当测量这种护理类型尚未达成共识。