Suppr超能文献

选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂、文拉法辛和米氮平治疗重度抑郁症的最佳剂量:一项系统评价和剂量反应荟萃分析。

Optimal dose of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, venlafaxine, and mirtazapine in major depression: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis.

作者信息

Furukawa Toshi A, Cipriani Andrea, Cowen Philip J, Leucht Stefan, Egger Matthias, Salanti Georgia

机构信息

Department of Health Promotion and Human Behavior, and Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Graduate School of Medicine/School of Public Health, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.

Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Warneford Hospital, Oxford, UK; Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, Warneford Hospital, Oxford, UK.

出版信息

Lancet Psychiatry. 2019 Jul;6(7):601-609. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(19)30217-2. Epub 2019 Jun 6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Depression is the single largest contributor to non-fatal health loss worldwide. Second-generation antidepressants are the first-line option for pharmacological management of depression. Optimising their use is crucial in reducing the burden of depression; however, debate about their dose dependency and their optimal target dose is ongoing. We have aimed to summarise the currently available best evidence to inform this clinical question.

METHODS

We did a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of double-blind, randomised controlled trials that examined fixed doses of five selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs; citalopram, escitalopram, fluoxetine, paroxetine, and sertraline), venlafaxine, or mirtazapine in the acute treatment of adults (aged 18 years or older) with major depression, identified from the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, CINAHL, Embase, LILACS, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, AMED, PSYNDEX, websites of drug licensing agencies and pharmaceutical companies, and trial registries. We imposed no language restrictions, and the search was updated until Jan 8, 2016. Doses of SSRIs were converted to fluoxetine equivalents. Trials of antidepressants for patients with depression and a serious concomitant physical illness were excluded. The main outcomes were efficacy (treatment response defined as 50% or greater reduction in depression severity), tolerability (dropouts due to adverse effects), and acceptability (dropouts for any reasons), all after a median of 8 weeks of treatment (range 4-12 weeks). We used a random-effects, dose-response meta-analysis model with flexible splines for SSRIs, venlafaxine, and mirtazapine.

FINDINGS

28 554 records were identified through our search (24 524 published and 4030 unpublished records). 561 published and 121 unpublished full-text records were assessed for eligibility, and 77 studies were included (19 364 participants; mean age 42·5 years, SD 11·0; 7156 [60·9%] of 11 749 reported were women). For SSRIs (99 treatment groups), the dose-efficacy curve showed a gradual increase up to doses between 20 mg and 40 mg fluoxetine equivalents, and a flat to decreasing trend through the higher licensed doses up to 80 mg fluoxetine equivalents. Dropouts due to adverse effects increased steeply through the examined range. The relationship between the dose and dropouts for any reason indicated optimal acceptability for the SSRIs in the lower licensed range between 20 mg and 40 mg fluoxetine equivalents. Venlafaxine (16 treatment groups) had an initially increasing dose-efficacy relationship up to around 75-150 mg, followed by a more modest increase, whereas for mirtazapine (11 treatment groups) efficacy increased up to a dose of about 30 mg and then decreased. Both venlafaxine and mirtazapine showed optimal acceptability in the lower range of their licensed dose. These results were robust to several sensitivity analyses.

INTERPRETATION

For the most commonly used second-generation antidepressants, the lower range of the licensed dose achieves the optimal balance between efficacy, tolerability, and acceptability in the acute treatment of major depression.

FUNDING

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, Swiss National Science Foundation, and National Institute for Health Research.

摘要

背景

抑郁症是全球非致命性健康损失的最大单一因素。第二代抗抑郁药是抑郁症药物治疗的一线选择。优化其使用对于减轻抑郁症负担至关重要;然而,关于其剂量依赖性和最佳目标剂量的争论仍在继续。我们旨在总结目前可用的最佳证据,以解答这一临床问题。

方法

我们对双盲随机对照试验进行了系统评价和剂量反应荟萃分析,这些试验研究了五种选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂(SSRI,即西酞普兰、艾司西酞普兰、氟西汀、帕罗西汀和舍曲林)、文拉法辛或米氮平的固定剂量在18岁及以上成年重度抑郁症患者急性治疗中的效果,这些试验来自Cochrane对照试验中央注册库、护理学与健康领域数据库、Embase数据库、拉丁美洲和加勒比卫生科学数据库、医学期刊数据库、心理学文摘数据库、联合和补充医学数据库、德国心理学文摘数据库以及药物许可机构和制药公司的网站及试验注册库。我们未设语言限制,检索更新至2016年1月8日。SSRI的剂量换算为氟西汀等效剂量。排除了针对伴有严重躯体疾病的抑郁症患者的抗抑郁药试验。主要结局为疗效(治疗反应定义为抑郁严重程度降低50%或更多)、耐受性(因不良反应而退出试验者)和可接受性(因任何原因退出试验者),均为治疗8周(范围4 - 12周)后的结果。我们对SSRI、文拉法辛和米氮平使用了带有灵活样条的随机效应剂量反应荟萃分析模型。

结果

通过检索我们共识别出28554条记录(24524条已发表记录和4030条未发表记录)。对561条已发表和121条未发表的全文记录进行了纳入资格评估,共纳入77项研究(19364名参与者;平均年龄42.5岁,标准差11.0;在报告的11749名参与者中,7156名[60.9%]为女性)。对于SSRI(99个治疗组),剂量 - 疗效曲线显示,在氟西汀等效剂量达到20毫克至40毫克之间时逐渐上升,而在更高的许可剂量直至80毫克氟西汀等效剂量时呈平稳或下降趋势。在整个研究剂量范围内,因不良反应而退出试验者急剧增加。剂量与因任何原因退出试验者之间的关系表明,在20毫克至40毫克氟西汀等效剂量的较低许可范围内,SSRI的可接受性最佳。文拉法辛(16个治疗组)在剂量达到约75至150毫克之前,剂量 - 疗效关系最初呈上升趋势,随后上升幅度较小,而对于米氮平(11个治疗组),疗效在剂量约为30毫克时上升,之后下降。文拉法辛和米氮平在其许可剂量的较低范围内均显示出最佳可接受性。这些结果在多项敏感性分析中均很稳健。

解读

对于最常用的第二代抗抑郁药,在重度抑郁症急性治疗中,许可剂量的较低范围在疗效、耐受性和可接受性之间实现了最佳平衡。

资助

日本学术振兴会、瑞士国家科学基金会和英国国家卫生研究院。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b0eb/6586944/d2deac8d7a8b/gr1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验