Suppr超能文献

一项随机、开放标签、非劣效性的 4 期临床试验,旨在评估口服活减毒轮状病毒疫苗 ROTAVAC®与已上市的轮状病毒疫苗在健康婴儿中的免疫原性和安全性。

A randomized, open-labelled, non-inferiority phase 4 clinical trial to evaluate the immunogenicity and safety of the live, attenuated, oral rotavirus vaccine, ROTAVAC® in comparison with a licensed rotavirus vaccine in healthy infants.

机构信息

Bharat Biotech International Limited, Genome Valley, Shameerpet, Hyderabad, India.

Division of Gastrointestinal Sciences, Christian Medical College, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India.

出版信息

Vaccine. 2019 Jul 18;37(31):4407-4413. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.05.069. Epub 2019 Jun 6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

ROTAVAC® (nHRV), derived naturally from the human 116E rotavirus (RV) neonatal strain, was licensed in India in 2015 based on promising results of a phase 3, safety and efficacy vaccine trial. As a pre-requisite for WHO prequalification, we compared the immunogenicity and safety of ROTAVAC® to those of a WHO-prequalified, Rotarix®.

METHODS

We conducted a multicentre, open-labeled, randomized phase 4 clinical trial where 464 infants, 6-8 weeks of age were equally randomized to receive as licensed, the complete regimen of ROTAVAC® (3 doses; Group I) or Rotarix® (2 doses; Group II). Antibody responses (serum anti-RV Immunoglobulin A [IgA]) were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). The primary analysis was an assessment of non-inferiority of ROTAVAC® to Rotarix® for geometric mean concentration (GMC) for infants who received the complete regimen of either vaccine.

RESULTS

The GMC for Group I was 20.4 (95%CI: 17.6, 23.6) and that for Group II was 24.8 (95%CI: 20.3, 30.3), the GMC ratio was 0.82 (95% CI: 0.64, 1.05), thus meeting the non-inferiority criterion. Site-wise analysis of GMC titres revealed that one site had a peculiar pre-vaccination titre affecting only ROTAVAC® post-vaccination GMCs. Seroconversion rates were 35.3% (95%CI: 29.0, 41.9) and 31.0% (95%CI: 25.1, 37.4) for Groups I and Group II, respectively. There was no substantive difference in safety profiles between both vaccines.

CONCLUSIONS

The complete regimen of ROTAVAC® demonstrated immunological non-inferiority to the complete regimen of Rotarix® with a clinically acceptable safety profile. Because the demand for RV vaccines is increasing as more countries are expanding their immunization schedules, the lack of need of a buffering agent, low dose volume (0.5 mL), non-interference with other concomitantly administered vaccines, and conformance with WHO-prequalification requirements provide ROTAVAC® the potential for widespread global usage. Post completion of this study, ROTAVAC® is now a WHO-prequalified vaccine.

CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION

(CTRI Number: CTRI/2015/12/006428).

摘要

背景

ROTAVAC®(nHRV)源自人类 116E 轮状病毒(RV)新生儿株,根据 3 期安全性和疗效疫苗试验的良好结果,于 2015 年在印度获得许可。作为世界卫生组织(WHO)预认证的前提条件,我们比较了 ROTAVAC®与 WHO 预认证的 Rotarix®的免疫原性和安全性。

方法

我们开展了一项多中心、开放性、随机 4 期临床试验,其中 464 名 6-8 周龄婴儿被等分为两组,按照许可方案分别接种 ROTAVAC®(3 剂;I 组)或 Rotarix®(2 剂;II 组)。采用酶联免疫吸附试验(ELISA)检测血清抗 RV 免疫球蛋白 A(IgA)抗体应答。主要分析是评估 ROTAVAC®与 Rotarix®完全接种方案的非劣效性,比较两组婴儿的几何平均浓度(GMC)。

结果

I 组 GMC 为 20.4(95%CI:17.6,23.6),II 组 GMC 为 24.8(95%CI:20.3,30.3),GMC 比值为 0.82(95%CI:0.64,1.05),满足非劣效性标准。GMC 滴度的部位分析显示,一个部位存在一个特殊的疫苗前滴度,仅影响 ROTAVAC®接种后的 GMC。血清阳转率分别为 35.3%(95%CI:29.0,41.9)和 31.0%(95%CI:25.1,37.4),I 组和 II 组分别为 35.3%(95%CI:29.0,41.9)和 31.0%(95%CI:25.1,37.4)。两种疫苗的安全性特征无实质性差异。

结论

ROTAVAC®完整接种方案与 Rotarix®完整接种方案相比具有免疫非劣效性,且具有可接受的安全性特征。由于越来越多的国家扩大免疫计划,对 RV 疫苗的需求不断增加,ROTAVAC®不需要缓冲剂、低剂量体积(0.5ml)、不干扰同时接种的其他疫苗,且符合 WHO 预认证要求,因此具有广泛的全球应用潜力。本研究完成后,ROTAVAC®现已获得 WHO 预认证。

临床试验注册

(CTRI 编号:CTRI/2015/12/006428)。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验