Ghent University, Belgium.
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA.
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2020 Feb;46(2):204-215. doi: 10.1177/0146167219853844. Epub 2019 Jun 10.
People are more inclined to believe that information is true if they have encountered it before. Little is known about whether this illusory truth effect is influenced by individual differences in cognition. In seven studies (combined = 2,196), using both trivia statements (Studies 1-6) and partisan news headlines (Study 7), we investigate moderation by three factors that have been shown to play a critical role in epistemic processes: cognitive ability (Studies 1, 2, 5), need for cognitive closure (Study 1), and cognitive style, that is, reliance on intuitive versus analytic thinking (Studies 1, 3-7). All studies showed a significant illusory truth effect, but there was no evidence for moderation by any of the cognitive measures across studies. These results indicate that the illusory truth effect is robust to individual differences in cognitive ability, need for cognitive closure, and cognitive style.
如果人们之前已经遇到过某个信息,他们更倾向于相信这个信息是真实的。但是,对于这种虚幻的真实效应是否受到认知个体差异的影响,目前还知之甚少。在七项研究(合并样本量为 2196)中,我们使用琐事陈述(研究 1-6)和党派新闻标题(研究 7),调查了三个已被证明在认识过程中起着关键作用的因素的调节作用:认知能力(研究 1、2、5)、认知闭合需求(研究 1)以及认知风格,即依赖于直觉思维还是分析思维(研究 1、3-7)。所有研究都表明存在明显的虚幻真实效应,但没有证据表明任何认知测量指标在不同研究中存在调节作用。这些结果表明,虚幻真实效应不受认知能力、认知闭合需求和认知风格的个体差异的影响。