• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

应对新冠疫情信息疫情:元认知效率对健康行为及政策态度的影响

Navigating the COVID-19 infodemic: the influence of metacognitive efficiency on health behaviours and policy attitudes.

作者信息

Lisi Matteo

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Essex, Essex, UK.

Department of Psychology, Royal Holloway, University of London, London, UK.

出版信息

R Soc Open Sci. 2023 Sep 6;10(9):230417. doi: 10.1098/rsos.230417. eCollection 2023 Sep.

DOI:10.1098/rsos.230417
PMID:37680503
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10480698/
Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has been accompanied by an infodemic of misinformation and increasing polarization around public health measures, such as social distancing and national lockdowns. In this study, I examined metacognitive efficiency-the extent to which the subjective feeling of knowing predicts the objective accuracy of knowledge-as a tool to understand and measure the assimilation of misleading misinformation in a balanced sample of Great Britain's population ( = 1689), surveyed at the end of the third national lockdown. Using a signal-detection theory approach to quantify metacognitive efficiency, I found that at the population level, metacognitive efficiency for COVID-19 knowledge was impaired compared with general knowledge, indicating a worse alignment between confidence levels and the actual ability to discern true and false statements. Crucially, individual differences in metacognitive efficiency related to COVID-19 knowledge predicted health-protective behaviours, vaccination intentions and attitudes towards public health measures, even after accounting for the level of knowledge itself and demographic covariates, such as education, income and political alignment. These results reveal the significant impact of misinformation on public beliefs and suggest that fostering confidence in accurate knowledge should be a key target for science communication efforts aimed at promoting compliance with public health and social measures.

摘要

新冠疫情伴随着错误信息的泛滥,以及围绕社交距离和全国封锁等公共卫生措施的两极分化加剧。在本研究中,我考察了元认知效率(即知道感在多大程度上能够预测知识的客观准确性),以此作为理解和衡量在英国人口均衡样本( = 1689)中误导性错误信息同化情况的一种工具,该样本是在第三次全国封锁结束时进行调查的。通过信号检测理论方法来量化元认知效率,我发现,在总体层面,与一般知识相比,新冠知识的元认知效率受到了损害,这表明信心水平与辨别真假陈述的实际能力之间的一致性较差。至关重要的是,即使在考虑了知识本身的水平以及人口统计学协变量(如教育程度、收入和政治倾向)之后,与新冠知识相关的元认知效率的个体差异仍能预测健康保护行为、疫苗接种意愿以及对公共卫生措施的态度。这些结果揭示了错误信息对公众信念的重大影响,并表明增强对准确知识的信心应成为旨在促进遵守公共卫生和社会措施的科学传播努力的关键目标。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f8b/10480698/a78e9ca6cf18/rsos230417f04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f8b/10480698/93a735466683/rsos230417f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f8b/10480698/bc49eecb895e/rsos230417f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f8b/10480698/67c980724794/rsos230417f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f8b/10480698/a78e9ca6cf18/rsos230417f04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f8b/10480698/93a735466683/rsos230417f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f8b/10480698/bc49eecb895e/rsos230417f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f8b/10480698/67c980724794/rsos230417f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f8b/10480698/a78e9ca6cf18/rsos230417f04.jpg

相似文献

1
Navigating the COVID-19 infodemic: the influence of metacognitive efficiency on health behaviours and policy attitudes.应对新冠疫情信息疫情:元认知效率对健康行为及政策态度的影响
R Soc Open Sci. 2023 Sep 6;10(9):230417. doi: 10.1098/rsos.230417. eCollection 2023 Sep.
2
Fake news in the age of COVID-19: evolutional and psychobiological considerations.新冠疫情时代的假新闻:进化和心理生物学方面的考虑。
Psychiatriki. 2022 Sep 19;33(3):183-186. doi: 10.22365/jpsych.2022.087. Epub 2022 Jul 19.
3
Investigating and Improving the Accuracy of US Citizens' Beliefs About the COVID-19 Pandemic: Longitudinal Survey Study.调查和提高美国公民对新冠疫情的认知准确性:纵向调查研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Jan 12;23(1):e24069. doi: 10.2196/24069.
4
Insight across mental disorders: A multifaceted metacognitive phenomenon.洞察精神障碍:一种多方面的元认知现象。
Psychiatriki. 2019 Jan-Mar;30(1):13-16. doi: 10.22365/jpsych.2019.301.13.
5
Constituents' Inferences of Local Governments' Goals and the Relationship Between Political Party and Belief in COVID-19 Misinformation: Cross-sectional Survey of Twitter Followers of State Public Health Departments.地方政府目标的选民推断以及政党与新冠疫情错误信息中的信念之间的关系:对州公共卫生部门推特关注者的横断面调查
JMIR Infodemiology. 2022 Feb 10;2(1):e29246. doi: 10.2196/29246. eCollection 2022 Jan-Jun.
6
Metacognition, public health compliance, and vaccination willingness.元认知、公共卫生合规性和疫苗接种意愿。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023 Oct 24;120(43):e2105425120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2105425120. Epub 2023 Oct 18.
7
The political (a)symmetry of metacognitive insight into detecting misinformation.元认知洞察检测错误信息的政治(非)对称性。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2024 Aug;153(8):1961-1972. doi: 10.1037/xge0001600.
8
A Comprehensive Analysis of COVID-19 Misinformation, Public Health Impacts, and Communication Strategies: Scoping Review.全面分析新冠病毒错误信息、公共卫生影响和传播策略:范围综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Aug 21;26:e56931. doi: 10.2196/56931.
9
Misinformation, believability, and vaccine acceptance over 40 countries: Takeaways from the initial phase of the COVID-19 infodemic.40 多个国家的错误信息、可信度与疫苗接种:新冠疫情信息流初始阶段的重要发现。
PLoS One. 2022 Feb 9;17(2):e0263381. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0263381. eCollection 2022.
10
The Challenge of Debunking Health Misinformation in Dynamic Social Media Conversations: Online Randomized Study of Public Masking During COVID-19.揭穿动态社交媒体对话中健康错误信息的挑战:COVID-19 期间公众戴口罩的在线随机研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Mar 2;24(3):e34831. doi: 10.2196/34831.

引用本文的文献

1
Digital health literacy: A concept analysis.数字健康素养:一项概念分析。
Digit Health. 2024 Oct 7;10:20552076241287894. doi: 10.1177/20552076241287894. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.

本文引用的文献

1
Stan: A Probabilistic Programming Language.斯坦:一种概率编程语言。
J Stat Softw. 2017;76. doi: 10.18637/jss.v076.i01. Epub 2017 Jan 11.
2
Contested science: Individuals with higher metacognitive insight into interpretation of evidence are less likely to polarize.有争议的科学:对证据解释具有较高元认知洞察力的个体不太可能出现两极分化。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2022 Apr;29(2):668-680. doi: 10.3758/s13423-021-01993-y. Epub 2021 Oct 29.
3
Quantifying the effects of fake news on behavior: Evidence from a study of COVID-19 misinformation.
量化假新闻对行为的影响:来自一项关于新冠疫情错误信息研究的证据。
J Exp Psychol Appl. 2021 Dec;27(4):773-784. doi: 10.1037/xap0000371. Epub 2021 Jun 10.
4
The Psychology of Fake News.假新闻的心理学。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2021 May;25(5):388-402. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2021.02.007. Epub 2021 Mar 15.
5
Measuring the impact of COVID-19 vaccine misinformation on vaccination intent in the UK and USA.测量 COVID-19 疫苗错误信息对英国和美国疫苗接种意愿的影响。
Nat Hum Behav. 2021 Mar;5(3):337-348. doi: 10.1038/s41562-021-01056-1. Epub 2021 Feb 5.
6
Dogmatism manifests in lowered information search under uncertainty.教条主义表现为在不确定情况下降低信息搜索。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Dec 8;117(49):31527-31534. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2009641117. Epub 2020 Nov 19.
7
Misinformed and unaware? Metacognition and the influence of inaccurate information.信息误导与认知缺失?元认知与错误信息的影响
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2021 Apr;47(4):608-624. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000977. Epub 2020 Nov 5.
8
Assessing the risks of 'infodemics' in response to COVID-19 epidemics.评估应对 COVID-19 疫情“信息疫情”的风险。
Nat Hum Behav. 2020 Dec;4(12):1285-1293. doi: 10.1038/s41562-020-00994-6. Epub 2020 Oct 29.
9
Associations Between COVID-19 Misinformation Exposure and Belief With COVID-19 Knowledge and Preventive Behaviors: Cross-Sectional Online Study.新冠疫情虚假信息接触及相关信念与新冠疫情知识和预防行为之间的关联:横断面在线研究
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Nov 13;22(11):e22205. doi: 10.2196/22205.
10
Model uncertainty, political contestation, and public trust in science: Evidence from the COVID-19 pandemic.模型不确定性、政治争议与公众对科学的信任:来自新冠疫情的证据。
Sci Adv. 2020 Oct 21;6(43). doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abd4563. Print 2020 Oct.