Department of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Ageing Res Rev. 2019 Aug;53:100916. doi: 10.1016/j.arr.2019.100916. Epub 2019 Jun 10.
Inflammation is increasingly implicated as a risk factor for dementia, stroke, and small vessel disease (SVD). However, the underlying mechanisms and causative pathways remain unclear. We systematically reviewed the existing literature on the associations between markers of inflammation and SVD (i.e., white matter hyperintensities (WMH), lacunes, enlarged perivascular spaces (EPVS), cerebral microbleeds (CMB)) in cohorts of older people with good health, cerebrovascular disease, or cognitive impairment. Based on distinctions made in the literature, markers of inflammation were classified as systemic inflammation (e.g. C-reactive protein, interleukin-6, fibrinogen) or vascular inflammation/endothelial dysfunction (e.g. homocysteine, von Willebrand factor, Lp-PLA2). Evidence from 82 articles revealed relatively robust associations between SVD and markers of vascular inflammation, especially amongst stroke patients, suggesting that alterations to the endothelium and blood-brain barrier may be a driving force behind SVD. Conversely, cross-sectional findings on systemic inflammation were mixed, although longitudinal investigations demonstrated that elevated levels of systemic inflammatory markers at baseline predicted subsequent SVD severity and progression. Importantly, regional analysis revealed that systemic and vascular inflammation were differentially related to two distinct forms of SVD. Specifically, markers of vascular inflammation tended to be associated with SVD in areas typical of hypertensive arteriopathy (e.g., basal ganglia), while systemic inflammation appeared to be involved in CAA-related vascular damage (e.g., centrum semiovale). Nonetheless, there is insufficient data to establish whether inflammation is causal of, or secondary to, SVD. Findings have important implications on interventions, suggesting the potential utility of treatments targeting the brain endothelium and blood brain barrier to combat SVD and associated neurodegenerative diseases.
炎症越来越被认为是痴呆症、中风和小血管疾病 (SVD) 的风险因素。然而,其潜在机制和因果途径仍不清楚。我们系统地回顾了现有关于炎症标志物与 SVD(即脑白质高信号 (WMH)、腔隙、扩大的血管周围间隙 (EPVS)、脑微出血 (CMB))之间关联的文献,这些文献涉及健康状况良好的老年人队列、脑血管疾病或认知障碍。基于文献中的区别,炎症标志物被分为系统性炎症(例如 C-反应蛋白、白细胞介素-6、纤维蛋白原)或血管炎症/内皮功能障碍(例如同型半胱氨酸、血管性血友病因子、脂蛋白相关磷脂酶 A2)。82 篇文章的证据表明,SVD 与血管炎症标志物之间存在相对较强的关联,尤其是在中风患者中,这表明内皮和血脑屏障的改变可能是 SVD 的驱动力。相反,关于系统性炎症的横断面研究结果参差不齐,尽管纵向研究表明,基线时系统性炎症标志物水平升高预示着随后 SVD 严重程度和进展。重要的是,区域分析表明,系统性和血管炎症与两种不同形式的 SVD 有不同的关系。具体来说,血管炎症标志物往往与高血压性血管病变(例如基底节)相关的 SVD 有关,而系统性炎症似乎与 CAA 相关的血管损伤(例如半卵圆中心)有关。尽管如此,目前还没有足够的数据来确定炎症是 SVD 的原因还是结果。这些发现对干预措施具有重要意义,表明针对大脑内皮和血脑屏障的治疗可能具有治疗 SVD 和相关神经退行性疾病的潜力。
Ageing Res Rev. 2019-6-10
Cerebrovasc Dis. 2020-10-19
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2016-12
Immun Inflamm Dis. 2025-8