Sophiahemmet University, Sweden.
Linnaeus University, Sweden.
Nurs Ethics. 2020 Mar;27(2):419-432. doi: 10.1177/0969733019848050. Epub 2019 Jun 11.
Nurses and physicians in nephrology settings provide care for patients with end-stage kidney disease receiving hemodialysis treatment along a complex illness trajectory.
The aim was to explore physicians' and nurses' perspectives on the trajectories toward the end of life involving decisions regarding hemodialysis withdrawal for patients with end-stage kidney disease.
A qualitative research approach was used. Four mixed focus group interviews were conducted with renal physicians (5) and nurses (17) in Sweden. Qualitative content analysis was used to analyse data.
Ethical approval was obtained (Dnr 2014/304-31).
Findings illuminated multi-faceted, intertwined processes encompassing healthcare professionals, patients, and family members. The analysis resulted in four themes: Complexities of initiating end-of-life conversations, Genuine attentiveness to the patient's decision-making process, The challenge awaiting the family members' processes, and Negotiating different professional responsibilities. Findings showed complexities and challenges when striving to provide good, ethical care which are related to beneficence, nonmaleficence, and self-determination, and which can give rise to moral distress.
There are ethical challenges and strains in the dialysis context that healthcare professionals may not always be prepared for. Supporting healthcare professionals in not allowing complexities to hinder the patient's possibilities for shared decision-making seems important. An open and continual communication, including family meetings, from dialysis initiation could serve to make conversations involving decisions about hemodialysis withdrawal a more natural routine, as well as build up a relationship of trust necessary for the advance care planning about the end of life. Healthcare professionals should also receive support in ethical reasoning to meet these challenges and handle potential moral distress in the dialysis context.
肾病科的护士和医生为接受血液透析治疗的终末期肾病患者提供护理,患者的疾病轨迹复杂。
旨在探讨医生和护士对涉及终末期肾病患者停止血液透析决策的临终轨迹的看法。
采用定性研究方法。在瑞典,对 5 名肾脏医生和 17 名护士进行了 4 次混合焦点小组访谈。使用定性内容分析来分析数据。
已获得伦理批准(Dnr 2014/304-31)。
研究结果阐明了涉及医疗保健专业人员、患者和家庭成员的多方面、相互交织的过程。分析结果得出了四个主题:结束生命对话的复杂性、真诚关注患者的决策过程、等待家庭成员过程的挑战、以及协商不同的专业责任。研究结果表明,在努力提供良好、符合伦理的护理时存在复杂性和挑战,这与善行、不伤害和自决有关,可能会导致道德困境。
在透析环境中存在伦理挑战和紧张局势,医护人员可能并不总是为此做好准备。支持医护人员不允许复杂性阻碍患者共同决策的可能性似乎很重要。从透析开始就进行开放和持续的沟通,包括家庭会议,可以使有关停止血液透析的决策对话成为更自然的常规,并建立信任关系,这是进行临终关怀规划的必要条件。医护人员还应在伦理推理方面得到支持,以应对这些挑战并处理透析环境中潜在的道德困境。