Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; Centre for Kidney Research, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Australia.
Am J Kidney Dis. 2017 Sep;70(3):315-323. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2016.11.023. Epub 2017 Feb 17.
Advance care planning (ACP) empowers patients to consider and communicate their current and future treatment goals. However, ACP is not widely implemented in chronic kidney disease (CKD) care settings. This study aims to describe clinicians' beliefs, challenges, and perspectives of ACP in patients with CKD.
Qualitative study.
SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: Nephrologists (n=20), nurses (n=7), and social workers (n=4) with a range of experience in facilitating ACP for patients with CKD across Australia.
Semistructured interviews were digitally recorded and transcribed verbatim.
Transcripts were analyzed using thematic analysis.
5 major themes were identified: facilitating informed decision making (avoiding preconceptions, conveying complete truths, focusing on supportive care, and synchronizing with evolving priorities), negotiating moral boundaries (contending with medical futility and respecting patient vs family autonomy), navigating vulnerable conversations (jeopardizing the therapeutic relationship, compromising professional confidence, emotionally invested, and enriching experiences), professional disempowerment (unsupportive culture, doubting logistical feasibility, and making uncertain judgments), and clarifying responsibilities (governing facilitation, managing tensions, and transforming multidisciplinary relationships).
Some findings may be specific to the Australian context.
The tensions among themes reflect that ACP is paradoxically rewarding for clinicians because ACP empowers patients yet can expose personal and professional vulnerabilities. Clinicians believe that a more collaborative approach is needed, with increased efforts to identify the evolving and individualized needs and goals of patients with CKD. Models of ACP that address clinicians' personal and professional vulnerabilities when initiating ACP may foster greater confidence and cultural acceptance of ACP in the CKD setting.
预先医疗照护计划(ACP)使患者能够考虑并传达其当前和未来的治疗目标。然而,ACP 在慢性肾脏病(CKD)护理环境中并未得到广泛实施。本研究旨在描述临床医生在 CKD 患者中对 ACP 的信念、挑战和观点。
定性研究。
20 名肾病学家、7 名护士和 4 名社工,他们在澳大利亚各地具有为 CKD 患者促进 ACP 的丰富经验。
半结构式访谈以数字方式记录并逐字转录。
使用主题分析对转录本进行分析。
确定了 5 个主要主题:促进知情决策(避免先入为主、传达完整的事实、关注支持性护理、并与不断变化的优先事项保持同步)、协商道德界限(应对医疗无效性和尊重患者与家庭自主权)、驾驭脆弱的对话(危及治疗关系、损害专业信心、情感投入和丰富体验)、专业赋权(支持性文化不足、怀疑后勤可行性、做出不确定的判断)和澄清责任(规范促进、管理紧张局势和改变多学科关系)。
某些发现可能特定于澳大利亚的情况。
主题之间的紧张关系反映出 ACP 对临床医生来说是矛盾的,因为 ACP 赋予患者权力,但也可能暴露个人和专业的脆弱性。临床医生认为需要采取更具协作性的方法,更加努力地识别 CKD 患者不断变化和个性化的需求和目标。解决临床医生在启动 ACP 时的个人和专业脆弱性的 ACP 模型,可能会在 CKD 环境中培养对 ACP 的更大信心和文化接受度。