Inorganic Geochemistry, Centre for Environmental Geochemistry, British Geological Survey, Nottingham, UK.
Section of Environment and Radiation, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France.
Environ Geochem Health. 2020 Apr;42(4):1141-1151. doi: 10.1007/s10653-019-00352-0. Epub 2019 Jun 12.
Spot urinary iodine concentrations (UIC) are presented for 248 individuals from western Kenya with paired drinking water collected between 2016 and 2018. The median UIC was 271 µg L, ranging from 9 to 3146 µg L, unadjusted for hydration status/dilution. From these data, 12% were potentially iodine deficient (< 100 µg L), whilst 44% were considered to have an excess iodine intake (> 300 µg L). The application of hydration status/urinary dilution correction methods was evaluated for UICs, using creatinine, osmolality and specific gravity. The use of specific gravity correction for spot urine samples to account for hydration status/urinary dilution presents a practical approach for studies with limited budgets, rather than relying on unadjusted UICs, 24 h sampling, use of significantly large sample size in a cross-sectional study and other reported measures to smooth out the urinary dilution effect. Urinary corrections did influence boundary assessment for deficiency-sufficiency-excess for this group of participants, ranging from 31 to 44% having excess iodine intake, albeit for a study of this size. However, comparison of the correction methods did highlight that 22% of the variation in UICs was due to urinary dilution, highlighting the need for such correction, although creatinine performed poorly, yet specific gravity as a low-cost method was comparable to osmolality corrections as the often stated 'gold standard' metric for urinary concentration. Paired drinking water samples contained a median iodine concentration of 3.2 µg L (0.2-304.1 µg L). A weak correlation was observed between UIC and water-I concentrations (R = 0.11).
对来自肯尼亚西部的 248 个人的随机尿碘浓度 (UIC) 进行了检测,这些人在 2016 年至 2018 年间采集了配对的饮用水。未经水化状态/稀释校正,UIC 的中位数为 271μg/L,范围为 9 至 3146μg/L。根据这些数据,12%的人可能存在碘缺乏 (<100μg/L),而 44%的人则被认为碘摄入过量 (>300μg/L)。使用肌酐、渗透压和比重评估了 UIC 水化状态/尿稀释校正方法的应用。使用比重校正法对随机尿样进行水化状态/尿稀释校正,是一种适用于预算有限的研究的实用方法,而不是依赖未经校正的 UIC、24 小时采样、在横断面研究中使用显著较大的样本量以及其他报告的措施来平滑尿稀释效应。尿液校正确实影响了该组参与者的缺乏-充足-过量的边界评估,范围从 31%到 44%的人碘摄入过量,尽管这是一项如此规模的研究。然而,校正方法的比较确实强调了 UIC 变化的 22%是由于尿稀释引起的,这突出了需要进行这种校正的必要性,尽管肌酐表现不佳,但比重作为一种低成本方法与渗透压校正法相当,因为渗透压校正法是常被提及的尿浓度“金标准”度量标准。配对的饮用水样本中碘的中位数浓度为 3.2μg/L (0.2-304.1μg/L)。UIC 与水碘浓度之间观察到弱相关性 (R=0.11)。