下颌支双极射频消融术治疗难治性三叉神经第三支痛
Bipolar radiofrequency ablation of mandibular branch for refractory V3 trigeminal neuralgia.
作者信息
Huang Bing, Xie Keyue, Chen Yajing, Wu Jiang, Yao Ming
机构信息
Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital, Jiaxing University, Jiaxing, Zhejiang 314000, People's Republic of China.
Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Washington Medical Center, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.
出版信息
J Pain Res. 2019 May 9;12:1465-1474. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S197967. eCollection 2019.
Percutaneous trans-foramen ovale (FO) radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of Gasserian ganglion (GG) is commonly used to treat V3 trigeminal neuralgia (TN). However, this intracranial approach is less selective and safe. To report a novel percutaneous within-FO RFA of the V3 under CT-guidance and outcomes with both bipolar and monopolar techniques. Twenty-six patients with isolated V3 primary TN and FO >6 mm in diameter underwent either monopolar (n=12) or bipolar RFAs (n=14) based on their preference. Successful analgesia over V3, residual pain, recurrent pain, and complications were compared between the two groups. The ex vivo egg albumen model was used to demonstrate the size difference in the thermocoagulation lesion created by monopolar vs bipolar electrodes. In the bipolar group, there were more cases of masticatory atonia as compared to the monopolar (=0.104), but no residual pain was observed. In the monopolar group, there were two cases of residual pain found, which led to immediate repeat RFAs. Therefore, during the immediate post-operative period, both groups obtained 100% complete V3 analgesia with a similar risk of facial hematoma (=0.641). During up to 27-months of post-operative follow-up, in the bipolar group, complete pain relief persisted in all patients; in the monopolar group, 1 case of recurrent pain was found at 14 months. Ex vivo study demonstrated that, at 90 °C/90 seconds of RFA, the width of lesions is significantly larger by the 6-mm spacing parallel-tip bipolar electrodes compared to the monopolar electrode (9.5±0.567 vs 5.5±0.07 mm). In treating patients with isolated V3 TN and FO >6mm in diameter, this percutaneously within-FO RFA of the V3 under CT guidance is both clinically practical and effective, while bipolar RFA is associated with a lower incidence of residual and recurrent pain likely due to larger lesion sizes.
经皮卵圆孔(FO)射频消融术(RFA)治疗三叉神经半月节(GG)常用于治疗V3三叉神经痛(TN)。然而,这种颅内入路的选择性和安全性较低。本研究报告一种在CT引导下经皮卵圆孔内V3射频消融术的新方法以及双极和单极技术的治疗效果。26例孤立性V3原发性TN且卵圆孔直径>6mm的患者,根据自身意愿接受单极(n = 12)或双极RFA(n = 14)治疗。比较两组患者V3区域的成功镇痛情况、残余疼痛、复发性疼痛及并发症。采用离体蛋清模型展示单极与双极电极产生的热凝损伤大小差异。双极组咀嚼肌麻痹的病例数比单极组多(P = 0.104),但未观察到残余疼痛。单极组发现2例残余疼痛,需立即重复RFA。因此,术后即刻两组均实现100%的V3区域完全镇痛,面部血肿风险相似(P = 0.641)。术后长达27个月的随访期间,双极组所有患者持续完全缓解疼痛;单极组在14个月时发现1例复发性疼痛。离体研究表明,在90°C/90秒的RFA条件下,6mm间距的平行尖端双极电极产生的损伤宽度比单极电极显著更大(9.5±0.567 vs 5.5±0.07mm)。对于直径>6mm的孤立性V3 TN患者,CT引导下经皮卵圆孔内V3射频消融术临床实用且有效,而双极RFA可能由于损伤较大,残余和复发性疼痛发生率较低。
相似文献
引用本文的文献
Front Mol Neurosci. 2022-7-28
Exp Ther Med. 2022-1
本文引用的文献
Lancet Neurol. 2018-5
Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2015-2-24
Pain Med. 2014-12
Intern Emerg Med. 2014-10