• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

综合髋部骨折护理项目:在三家医院的相继实施

Comprehensive Hip Fracture Care Program: Successive Implementation in 3 Hospitals.

作者信息

Jackson Kelly, Bachhuber Mary, Bowden Dawn, Etter Katherine, Tong Cindy

机构信息

Neuroscience Service Line, HonorHealth Osborn Medical Campus Administration, HonorHealth System, Scottsdale, AZ, USA.

Orthopedics, HonorHealth System, Scottsdale, AZ, USA.

出版信息

Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil. 2019 May 15;10:2151459319846057. doi: 10.1177/2151459319846057. eCollection 2019.

DOI:10.1177/2151459319846057
PMID:31192023
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6540498/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Hip fractures are common and costly in the elderly population, often contributing to loss of function and independence. Prompt, coordinated surgical care may improve clinical and economic outcomes for this population.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We created an interdisciplinary care program focused on minimizing time spent immobilized awaiting surgery and streamlining the care pathway for hip fracture. Patients older than 65 years with any hip fracture type including hip fracture repair Diagnosis-Related Group codes (MS-DRG 480, 481, or 482) and MS-DRG 469 and 470 with a hip fracture diagnosis were included in the study. The Hip Fracture Care program (HFCP) was implemented on a staggered basis in 3 hospitals in the HonorHealth system. Time to surgery, length of stay, and discharge location (home/skilled nursing facility) were compared pre- and post-intervention, utilizing an interrupted time series analysis to account for background trends.

RESULTS

More than 2000 patients across the 3 facilities received HFCP care; demographics were similar for the 826 patients serving as the pre-implementation comparison group. Mean (standard deviation [SD]) length of stay decreased from 5.6 (4.0) to 4.7 (2.9) days (mean difference 0.9 days; < .05). Mean (SD) time from admission to the operating room decreased from 30.8 (21.1) to 25.6 (20.5) hours (mean difference 5.2 hours; < .05). There was no change in the proportion of patients discharged to home versus skilled nursing facility.

DISCUSSION

Optimal care of this vulnerable population can significantly reduce the time to surgery and length of stay.

CONCLUSIONS

Length of stay was reduced by nearly 1 day with implementation of a multifactorial program for hip fracture care.

摘要

引言

髋部骨折在老年人群中很常见且代价高昂,常常导致功能丧失和生活不能自理。及时、协调的手术治疗可能会改善该人群的临床和经济结局。

材料与方法

我们创建了一个跨学科护理项目,重点是尽量减少等待手术时的固定时间,并简化髋部骨折的护理流程。纳入研究的患者为65岁以上的任何类型髋部骨折患者,包括髋部骨折修复诊断相关组代码(MS-DRG 480、481或482)以及诊断为髋部骨折的MS-DRG 469和470。髋部骨折护理项目(HFCP)在HonorHealth系统的3家医院分阶段实施。利用中断时间序列分析来考虑背景趋势,比较干预前后的手术时间、住院时间和出院地点(家庭/专业护理机构)。

结果

3家机构的2000多名患者接受了HFCP护理;作为实施前比较组的826名患者的人口统计学特征相似。平均(标准差[SD])住院时间从5.6(4.0)天降至4.7(2.9)天(平均差异0.9天;P<0.05)。从入院到手术室的平均(SD)时间从30.8(21.1)小时降至25.6(20.5)小时(平均差异5.2小时;P<0.05)。出院回家与出院到专业护理机构的患者比例没有变化。

讨论

对这一脆弱人群的最佳护理可显著缩短手术时间和住院时间。

结论

实施多因素髋部骨折护理项目使住院时间缩短了近1天。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a296/6540498/e5b0c65054ce/10.1177_2151459319846057-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a296/6540498/de1586b99480/10.1177_2151459319846057-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a296/6540498/128a882daab1/10.1177_2151459319846057-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a296/6540498/e5b0c65054ce/10.1177_2151459319846057-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a296/6540498/de1586b99480/10.1177_2151459319846057-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a296/6540498/128a882daab1/10.1177_2151459319846057-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a296/6540498/e5b0c65054ce/10.1177_2151459319846057-fig3.jpg

相似文献

1
Comprehensive Hip Fracture Care Program: Successive Implementation in 3 Hospitals.综合髋部骨折护理项目:在三家医院的相继实施
Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil. 2019 May 15;10:2151459319846057. doi: 10.1177/2151459319846057. eCollection 2019.
2
A Simple Physical Therapy Algorithm Is Successful in Decreasing Skilled Nursing Facility Length of Stay and Increasing Cost Savings After Hip Fracture With No Increase in Adverse Events.一种简单的物理治疗方案成功减少了髋部骨折后在专业护理机构的住院时间,并增加了成本节约,且未增加不良事件的发生。
Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil. 2021 Mar 24;12:2151459321998615. doi: 10.1177/2151459321998615. eCollection 2021.
3
2021 John Charnley Award: A protocol-based strategy when using hemiarthroplasty or total hip arthroplasty for femoral neck fractures decreases mortality, length of stay, and complications.2021 年约翰·查恩利奖:股骨颈骨折行人工股骨头置换或全髋关节置换基于方案的策略可降低死亡率、住院时间和并发症。
Bone Joint J. 2021 Jul;103-B(7 Supple B):3-8. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.103B7.BJJ-2020-2414.R1.
4
Interdisciplinary inpatient care for elderly people with hip fracture: a randomized controlled trial.老年髋部骨折患者的跨学科住院护理:一项随机对照试验。
CMAJ. 2002 Jul 9;167(1):25-32.
5
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Program Implementation in 2 Surgical Populations in an Integrated Health Care Delivery System.在综合医疗服务体系中,针对两类手术人群实施术后加速康复计划。
JAMA Surg. 2017 Jul 19;152(7):e171032. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2017.1032.
6
Comparing post-acute rehabilitation use, length of stay, and outcomes experienced by Medicare fee-for-service and Medicare Advantage beneficiaries with hip fracture in the United States: A secondary analysis of administrative data.比较美国 Medicare 按服务收费和 Medicare Advantage 受益人与髋部骨折相关的康复使用、住院时间和康复结局:基于行政数据的二次分析。
PLoS Med. 2018 Jun 26;15(6):e1002592. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002592. eCollection 2018 Jun.
7
What happens to patients when they fracture their hip during a skilled nursing facility stay?患者在熟练护理机构住院期间髋部骨折会发生什么情况?
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2015 Sep 1;16(9):767-74. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2015.03.026. Epub 2015 May 2.
8
Comparison of discharge functional status after rehabilitation in skilled nursing, home health, and medical rehabilitation settings for patients after hip fracture repair.比较髋关节骨折修复术后患者在熟练护理、家庭健康和医学康复环境中康复后的出院功能状态。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014 Feb;95(2):209-17. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2013.05.031. Epub 2013 Jul 10.
9
Association of Length of Stay, Recovery Rate, and Therapy Time per Day With Functional Outcomes After Hip Fracture Surgery.髋部骨折手术后住院时间、恢复率和每天治疗时间与功能结局的关系。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jan 3;3(1):e1919672. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.19672.
10
Geriatric trauma hip fractures: is there a difference in outcomes based on fracture patterns?老年创伤性髋部骨折:根据骨折类型,其结果是否存在差异?
World J Emerg Surg. 2014 Dec 13;9(1):59. doi: 10.1186/1749-7922-9-59. eCollection 2014.

引用本文的文献

1
Which performance indicators are used globally for evaluating healthcare in patients with a hip fracture? : a mixed methods systematic review.全球用于评估髋部骨折患者医疗保健的绩效指标有哪些?:一项混合方法的系统评价。
Bone Jt Open. 2025 Mar 6;6(3):275-290. doi: 10.1302/2633-1462.63.BJO-2024-0104.R1.
2
Effects of Protocol-driven Care by Internists on Adherence to Clinical Practice Guidelines for Hip Fracture Surgery Patients: An Interrupted Time Series Study Using a Nationwide Inpatient Database.内科医生的协议驱动护理对髋部骨折手术患者临床实践指南依从性的影响:一项使用全国住院患者数据库的中断时间序列研究。
Intern Med. 2025 Jul 15;64(14):2124-2135. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.4358-24. Epub 2025 Jan 3.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Surgical Technical Evidence Review of Hip Fracture Surgery Conducted for the AHRQ Safety Program for Improving Surgical Care and Recovery.为美国医疗保健研究与质量局(AHRQ)改善手术护理与恢复安全计划开展的髋部骨折手术外科技术证据审查。
Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil. 2018 May 20;9:2151459318769215. doi: 10.1177/2151459318769215. eCollection 2018.
2
Operative Trends in the Treatment of Hip Fractures and the Role of Arthroplasty.髋部骨折治疗的手术趋势及关节置换术的作用
Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil. 2018 Mar 22;9:2151459318760634. doi: 10.1177/2151459318760634. eCollection 2018.
3
Hip fracture trends in the United States, 2002 to 2015.
Inpatient or Outpatient: Does Initial Disposition Affect Outcomes in Trimalleolar Ankle Fractures?
住院还是门诊治疗:三踝骨折的初始处置方式会影响治疗结果吗?
Cureus. 2024 May 3;16(5):e59586. doi: 10.7759/cureus.59586. eCollection 2024 May.
4
Evaluation of Systemwide Improvement Programs to Optimize Time to Surgery for Patients With Hip Fractures: A Systematic Review.系统改进项目以优化髋部骨折患者手术时间的评估:系统评价。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Sep 1;5(9):e2231911. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.31911.
5
Analysis of the experience of the geriatric fracture program in two institutions in Colombia: a reproducible model?哥伦比亚两机构老年骨折项目经验分析:可复制模式?
Colomb Med (Cali). 2021 Jun 12;52(3):e2034524. doi: 10.25100/cm.v52i3.4524. eCollection 2021 Jul-Sep.
6
Protocol-based interdisciplinary co-management for hip fracture care: 3 years of experience at an academic medical center.基于方案的髋部骨折治疗跨学科联合管理:在学术医疗中心的 3 年经验。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2022 Jul;142(7):1491-1497. doi: 10.1007/s00402-020-03699-7. Epub 2021 Mar 2.
7
Key Service Improvements After the Introduction of an Integrated Orthogeriatric Service.引入综合骨科老年病服务后的关键服务改进措施。
Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil. 2019 Dec 11;10:2151459319893898. doi: 10.1177/2151459319893898. eCollection 2019.
美国 2002 年至 2015 年的髋部骨折趋势。
Osteoporos Int. 2018 Mar;29(3):717-722. doi: 10.1007/s00198-017-4345-0. Epub 2017 Dec 27.
4
Clinical Outcomes and 90-Day Costs Following Hemiarthroplasty or Total Hip Arthroplasty for Hip Fracture.髋关节骨折半髋关节置换术或全髋关节置换术后的临床结果及90天费用
J Arthroplasty. 2017 Sep;32(9S):S128-S134. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.01.023. Epub 2017 Jan 24.
5
Improvement in quality of hospital care during accreditation: A nationwide stepped-wedge study.认证期间医院护理质量的改善:一项全国性的阶梯楔形研究。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2016 Dec 1;28(6):715-720. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzw099.
6
Interrupted time series regression for the evaluation of public health interventions: a tutorial.中断时间序列回归在公共卫生干预措施评价中的应用:教程。
Int J Epidemiol. 2017 Feb 1;46(1):348-355. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyw098.
7
Racial and Socioeconomic Disparities in Hip Fracture Care.髋部骨折护理中的种族和社会经济差异。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2016 May 18;98(10):858-65. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.15.00676.
8
Variation in Resource Utilization for Patients With Hip and Pelvic Fractures Despite Equal Medicare Reimbursement.尽管医疗保险报销相同,但髋部和骨盆骨折患者的资源利用情况仍存在差异。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Jun;474(6):1486-94. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-4765-8. Epub 2016 Feb 25.
9
Regression based quasi-experimental approach when randomisation is not an option: interrupted time series analysis.在无法进行随机化时基于回归的准实验方法:中断时间序列分析。
BMJ. 2015 Jun 9;350:h2750. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h2750.
10
Postoperative length of stay and 30-day readmission after geriatric hip fracture: an analysis of 8434 patients.老年髋部骨折术后住院时间及30天再入院情况:8434例患者的分析
J Orthop Trauma. 2015 Mar;29(3):e115-20. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000222.