Moloney Mairead Eastin, Ciciurkaite Gabriele, Brown Robyn Lewis
1515 Patterson Office Tower, Department of Sociology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, 40506-0027, USA.
224E Old Main, Utah State University, Logan, UT, 84322-0730, USA.
SSM Popul Health. 2019 May 12;8:100388. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2019.100388. eCollection 2019 Aug.
Previous analysis of U.S. physician office visits (1993-2007) indicated that the medicalization of sleeplessness was on the rise and had potentially negative implications for population health. Our study asks if the medicalization of sleeplessness at the level of patient-physician interaction has persisted over time. Using the most recent years available (2008-2015) of the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey we calculated nationally representative estimates for four sleeplessness-related outcomes of physician office visits: sleeplessness complaint, insomnia diagnosis, and prescription of benzodiazepine and non-benzodiazepine sedative-hypnotics (NBSH). To test for the significance of the linear trajectory, we ran a series of bivariate linear models. We tested three hypotheses grounded in the medicalization framework: if the medicalization of sleeplessness at the interactional level is continuing at a rate comparable to previous analyses, sleeplessness-related outcomes will continue to increase significantly over time (Hypothesis 1); NBSH prescriptions and insomnia diagnoses will continue to outpace sleeplessness complaints (Hypothesis 2); and insomnia diagnoses and use of sedative-hypnotics will increase or remain concentrated among age groups who lack the changing sleep patterns and commonly occurring comorbidities associated with older age (Hypothesis 3). Support for these hypotheses was mixed. Unlike previous analyses wherein all sleeplessness-related outcome trends were positive and statistically significant over time, regression analyses revealed a significant NBSH prescription trend 2008-2015 (slope, b = -699,628, P < 0.05). No other associations were significant. Younger age groups were most likely to receive an insomnia diagnosis and NBSH prescription. These trends imply that the medicalization of sleeplessness at the level of patient-physician interaction may be on the decline. We suggest that increasingly negative portrayals of sedative-hypnotics, conservative practice recommendations, and decreased direct-to-consumer advertising for NBSH may decrease consumerism and physician compliance related to the medicalization of sleeplessness. We conclude with a discussion on non-pharmaceutical methods of reducing sleeplessness relevant to population health.
先前对美国医生门诊就诊情况(1993 - 2007年)的分析表明,失眠的医学化现象呈上升趋势,且可能对人群健康产生负面影响。我们的研究探讨了在医患互动层面上,失眠的医学化现象是否随时间持续存在。利用国家门诊医疗调查中最近可得的数据(2008 - 2015年),我们计算了具有全国代表性的医生门诊就诊中与失眠相关的四个结果的估计值:失眠主诉、失眠诊断以及苯二氮䓬类和非苯二氮䓬类镇静催眠药(NBSH)的处方情况。为检验线性轨迹的显著性,我们运行了一系列双变量线性模型。我们基于医学化框架检验了三个假设:如果在互动层面上失眠的医学化以与先前分析相当的速度持续,与失眠相关的结果将随时间继续显著增加(假设1);NBSH处方和失眠诊断将继续超过失眠主诉(假设2);失眠诊断和镇静催眠药的使用将增加或继续集中在缺乏与老年相关的睡眠模式变化和常见合并症的年龄组中(假设3)。对这些假设的支持情况不一。与先前所有与失眠相关的结果趋势随时间呈正向且具有统计学显著性的分析不同,回归分析显示2008 - 2015年NBSH处方有显著趋势(斜率,b = -699,628,P < 0.05)。没有其他关联具有显著性。较年轻的年龄组最有可能被诊断为失眠并开具NBSH处方。这些趋势意味着在医患互动层面上失眠的医学化可能正在下降。我们认为,对镇静催眠药越来越负面的描述、保守的实践建议以及针对NBSH的直接面向消费者的广告减少,可能会降低与失眠医学化相关的消费主义和医生的依从性。我们最后讨论了与人群健康相关的减少失眠的非药物方法。