Philip R. Lee Institute for Health Policy Studies, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA; Department of Family & Community Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Prev Med. 2019 Sep;126:105750. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2019.06.008. Epub 2019 Jun 11.
Education is a powerful predictor of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. While the majority of the literature has focused on years of educational attainment or degree attainment, fewer studies examine the role of educational quality in the prevention of cardiovascular disease (CVD). We tested the hypothesis that average state-level educational quality was associated with CVD, linking state-level data on educational quality with individual demographic and health data from multiple waves of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (N = 34,770). We examined thirteen CVD-related outcomes-including blood pressure, cholesterol, and heart attack-to understand the multiple pathways through which educational quality may influence CVD. The primary predictor was a composite index of educational quality, combining state-level measures of student-teacher ratios, per-pupil expenditures, and school term length. We fit multivariable models, regressing each outcome on the educational quality composite index and adjusting for individual- and state-level covariates. We also assessed whether the association between state educational quality and CVD differed for less educated individuals. Overall, higher educational quality was associated with less smoking (OR = 0.86, 95%CI: 0.77, 0.97), but there was no statistically significant association for the other 12 outcomes. Interaction tests indicated that less educated individuals benefited less from higher educational quality relative to those with more education for several outcomes. Our study suggests that state-level educational quality is not strongly associated with CVD, and that this null association overall may mask heterogeneous benefits that accrue disproportionately to those with higher levels of education.
教育是心血管发病率和死亡率的重要预测因素。尽管大多数文献都集中在受教育年限或学位获得上,但较少的研究考察教育质量在预防心血管疾病(CVD)方面的作用。我们检验了这样一个假设,即平均州级教育质量与 CVD 相关,将州级教育质量数据与来自多次国家健康和营养检查调查(N=34770)的个体人口统计学和健康数据联系起来。我们检查了 13 种与 CVD 相关的结果,包括血压、胆固醇和心脏病发作,以了解教育质量可能通过多种途径影响 CVD。主要预测因素是教育质量的综合指数,结合了学生-教师比例、每名学生支出和学期长度的州级衡量标准。我们拟合了多变量模型,将每个结果回归到教育质量综合指数,并根据个体和州级协变量进行调整。我们还评估了州教育质量与 CVD 之间的关联在受教育程度较低的个体中是否存在差异。总的来说,较高的教育质量与较低的吸烟率相关(OR=0.86,95%CI:0.77,0.97),但其他 12 种结果没有统计学意义。交互测试表明,与受教育程度较高的个体相比,受教育程度较低的个体从较高的教育质量中获益较少,对于几个结果而言是如此。我们的研究表明,州级教育质量与 CVD 没有很强的相关性,而且这种总体上的零关联可能掩盖了对教育程度较高的个体不成比例地获得的异质收益。