Section of Preventive Medicine and Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts.
Department of Public Health and Community Medicine, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts.
JAMA Cardiol. 2020 May 1;5(5):549-556. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2020.0109.
The American Heart Association ideal cardiovascular health (CVH) score is associated with the risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and mortality. However, it is unclear whether the number of years spent in ideal CVH is associated with morbidity or with mortality.
To evaluate whether living longer with a higher CVH score in midlife is associated with lower risk of hypertension, diabetes, chronic kidney disease, CVD and its subtypes (coronary heart disease, stroke, congestive heart failure, and peripheral artery disease), or all-cause mortality in later life.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This prospective cohort study used data from 1445 participants from 1991 to 2015 who participated in the community-based Framingham Heart Study Offspring investigation conducted in Massachusetts. The CVH scores of participants were assessed at examination cycles 5, 6, and 7 (1991-1995; 1995-1998; and 1998-2001, respectively). Individuals were excluded from analyses of the association between duration of CVH score and outcomes if they had the outcome of interest at the seventh examination. The median follow-up was approximately 16 years. Data were analyzed from April 2018 to October 2019. The CVH score categories were poor for scores 0 to 7, intermediate for scores 8 to 11, and ideal for scores 12 to 14. A composite score was derived based on smoking status, diet, physical activity, resting blood pressure levels, body mass index, fasting blood glucose levels, and total serum cholesterol levels.
Number of events and number at risk for each main outcome, including incident hypertension, diabetes, chronic kidney disease, CVD, and all-cause mortality, after the seventh examination.
Of 1445 eligible participants, the mean (SD) age was 60 (9) years, and 751 (52%) were women. Number of events/number at risk for each main outcome after the seventh examination were 348/795 for incident hypertension, 104/1304 for diabetes, 198/918 for chronic kidney disease, 210/1285 for CVD, and 300/1445 for all-cause mortality. At the seventh examination, participants mostly had poor (568 [39%]) or intermediate (782 [54%]) CVH scores. For each antecedent (before examination cycle 7) 5-year duration that participants had intermediate or ideal CVH, they were less likely to develop adverse outcomes (hazards ratios of 0.67 [95% CI, 0.56-0.80] for incident hypertension, 0.73 [95% CI, 0.57-0.93] for diabetes, 0.75 [95% CI, 0.63-0.89] for chronic kidney disease, 0.73 [95% CI, 0.63-0.85] for CVD, and 0.86 [95% CI, 0.76-0.97] for all-cause mortality) relative to living the same amount of time in poor CVH (referent group). No effect modification was observed by age or by sex.
These results suggest that more time spent in better CVH in midlife may have salutary cardiometabolic benefits and may be associated with lower mortality later in life.
美国心脏协会理想心血管健康 (CVH) 评分与心血管疾病 (CVD) 和死亡率风险相关。然而,尚不清楚一生中处于理想 CVH 状态的年限是否与发病率或死亡率相关。
评估中年时更高的 CVH 评分与较低的高血压、糖尿病、慢性肾脏病、CVD 及其亚型(冠心病、中风、充血性心力衰竭和外周动脉疾病)发病率或全因死亡率的相关性。
设计、地点和参与者:这项前瞻性队列研究使用了 1991 年至 2015 年期间参加马萨诸塞州社区为基础的弗雷明汉心脏研究后代研究的 1445 名参与者的数据。参与者的 CVH 评分在 5 个、6 个和 7 个检查周期(分别为 1991-1995 年、1995-1998 年和 1998-2001 年)进行评估。如果在第七次检查时出现了研究的主要结局,则将个体排除在 CVH 评分与结局之间的关联分析之外。中位随访时间约为 16 年。数据分析于 2018 年 4 月至 2019 年 10 月进行。CVH 评分类别为 0 至 7 分为差,8 至 11 分为中等,12 至 14 分为理想。根据吸烟状况、饮食、体力活动、静息血压水平、体重指数、空腹血糖水平和总血清胆固醇水平得出综合评分。
第七次检查后每种主要结局(高血压、糖尿病、慢性肾脏病、CVD 和全因死亡率)的事件数量和风险人数。
在 1445 名合格参与者中,平均(SD)年龄为 60(9)岁,751 名(52%)为女性。第七次检查后每种主要结局的事件/风险人数分别为:高血压事件 348/795,糖尿病事件 104/1304,慢性肾脏病事件 198/918,CVD 事件 210/1285,全因死亡率事件 300/1445。在第七次检查时,大多数参与者的 CVH 评分较差(568 [39%])或中等(782 [54%])。对于每个前因(在第七个检查周期之前)5 年处于中等或理想的 CVH 状态,他们发生不良结局的可能性较低(高血压的危险比为 0.67 [95%CI,0.56-0.80],糖尿病为 0.73 [95%CI,0.57-0.93],慢性肾脏病为 0.75 [95%CI,0.63-0.89],CVD 为 0.73 [95%CI,0.63-0.85],全因死亡率为 0.86 [95%CI,0.76-0.97]),与处于较差 CVH 状态的相同时间(参考组)相比。未观察到年龄或性别对这种效果的修饰作用。
这些结果表明,中年时处于更好的 CVH 状态可能会带来有益的心脏代谢益处,并且可能与晚年的死亡率降低有关。