Kirkhof College of Nursing, Grand Valley State University, 301 Michigan St, Room C352, Grand Rapids, MI, 49504, USA.
Departments of Psychiatry and Statistics and Probability, Michigan State University, East Lansing, USA.
Implement Sci. 2019 Jun 13;14(1):60. doi: 10.1186/s13012-019-0907-1.
In partnership with a state Medicaid home and community-based waiver program, this study tests implementation strategies for adoption and sustainability of an evidence-based intervention to support disabled and older adults who have difficulty with physical function and daily living tasks. A multi-level implementation strategy bundle will be directed at relationship, coalition, and team building; readiness to implement, leadership, and clinician attitude toward evidence assessments; intervention and facilitation training; interdisciplinary coordination; facilitation; and audit and feedback to support practice change.
Knowledge-to-Action model underpins this 2-arm, 3-year pragmatic mixed method randomized hybrid type III trial in 18 waiver program sites in Michigan. Data will be collected on sites, 775 clinicians (registered nurses, occupational therapists, social workers), and 15,000 disabled and older adults. Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research guides examination of site, clinician, and beneficiary characteristics; clinician attitude and self-efficacy; leadership and readiness to implement; and intervention impact on beneficiary outcomes. Sites will be randomized to either usual waiver care with internal facilitation of the bundle of implementation strategies or usual waiver care with both internal and external facilitation of the bundle. Primary outcomes are site-level adoption and sustainability over 12 months, and intervention effects on these outcomes are hypothesized to be mediated by clinicians' attitude and self-efficacy. At the beneficiary level, by addressing the individual's capabilities and home environment, the intervention is hypothesized to improve secondary outcomes of activities of daily living, pain, depression, falls, emergency department visits, and hospitalizations. Baseline site readiness and leadership and stages of implementation at 6 months will be explored as potential moderators. Linear mixed effects models will be used to test intervention effects on primary outcomes, with bias-correcting analytic strategy in mediation analyses. Generalized linear mixed effects modeling will be employed for the analysis of intervention effects on secondary outcomes.
Synthesizing findings within and across the sites, we will specify how leadership, readiness for change, and level of facilitation enhance capacity for adoption and sustainability of an evidence-based intervention in an under-resourced Medicaid setting that cares for disabled and older adults.
ClinitalTrials.gov , NCT03634033 . Registered 16 August 2018.
本研究与州医疗补助居家和社区服务豁免计划合作,旨在测试采用和维持循证干预措施以支持身体功能和日常生活活动有困难的残疾和老年人的实施策略。一个多层次的实施策略包将针对关系、联盟和团队建设、实施准备、领导力和临床医生对证据评估的态度、干预和促进培训、跨学科协调、促进以及审核和反馈以支持实践变革。
知识转化模型是密歇根州 18 个豁免计划站点的 2 臂、3 年务实混合方法随机混合 III 期试验的基础。将在站点、775 名临床医生(注册护士、职业治疗师、社会工作者)和 15000 名残疾和老年人身上收集数据。实施研究综合框架指导对站点、临床医生和受益人的特征;临床医生的态度和自我效能感;领导力和实施准备;以及干预对受益人的结果的影响的检查。站点将被随机分配到常规豁免护理,其中包括实施策略包的内部促进,或常规豁免护理,其中包括实施策略包的内部和外部促进。主要结果是 12 个月内的站点采用和可持续性,并且假设干预对这些结果的影响通过临床医生的态度和自我效能感来介导。在受益人的层面上,通过解决个人的能力和家庭环境问题,干预假设将改善日常生活活动、疼痛、抑郁、跌倒、急诊就诊和住院的次要结果。将探索基线站点准备情况和领导能力以及 6 个月时的实施阶段作为潜在的调节因素。线性混合效应模型将用于测试干预对主要结果的影响,在中介分析中采用偏差校正分析策略。广义线性混合效应模型将用于分析干预对次要结果的影响。
在站点内和站点间综合分析结果,我们将具体说明领导力、变革准备和促进程度如何增强在资源不足的医疗补助环境中采用和维持循证干预措施的能力,为残疾和老年人提供服务。
ClinitalTrials.gov,NCT03634033。2018 年 8 月 16 日注册。