Division of Tropical and Humanitarian Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals and University of Geneva, Rue Gabrielle-Perret-Gentil 4, Geneva, Switzerland.
Gender Centre, Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies, Ch. Eugène-Rigot 2, Geneva, Switzerland.
Health Policy Plan. 2019 Jun 1;34(5):370-383. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czz043.
Although non-communicable diseases (NCDs) are the leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide, the global policy response has not been commensurate with their health, economic and social burden. This study examined factors facilitating and hampering the prioritization of NCDs on the United Nations (UN) health agenda. Shiffman and Smith's (Generation of political priority for global health initiatives: a framework and case study of maternal mortality. The Lancet 370: 1370-9.) political priority framework served as a structure for analysis of a review of NCD policy documents identified through the World Health Organization's (WHO) NCD Global Action Plan 2013-20, and complemented by 11 semi-structured interviews with key informants from different sectors. The results show that a cohesive policy community exists, and leaders are present, however, actor power does not extend beyond the health sector and the role of guiding institutions and civil society have only recently gained momentum. The framing of NCDs as four risk factors and four diseases does not necessarily resonate with experts from the larger policy community, but the economic argument seems to have enabled some traction to be gained. While many policy windows have occurred, their impact has been limited by the institutional constraints of the WHO. Credible indicators and effective interventions exist, but their applicability globally, especially in low- and middle-income countries, is questionable. To be effective, the NCD movement needs to expand beyond global health experts, foster civil society and develop a broader and more inclusive global governance structure. Applying the Shiffman and Smith framework for NCDs enabled different elements of how NCDs were able to get on the UN policy agenda to be disentangled. Much work has been done to frame the challenges and solutions, but implementation processes and their applicability remain challenging globally. NCD responses need to be adapted to local contexts, focus sufficiently on both prevention and management of disease, and have a stronger global governance structure.
虽然非传染性疾病(NCDs)是全球发病率和死亡率的主要原因,但全球政策反应与其对健康、经济和社会的负担并不相称。本研究考察了促进和阻碍将非传染性疾病纳入联合国(UN)卫生议程优先事项的因素。Shiffman 和 Smith 的(为全球卫生倡议创造政治优先事项:产妇死亡率的框架和案例研究。柳叶刀 370:1370-9.)政治优先事项框架作为分析通过世界卫生组织(WHO)2013-20 年非传染性疾病全球行动计划确定的非传染性疾病政策文件的结构,并辅以与来自不同部门的主要利益攸关方的 11 次半结构化访谈。结果表明,存在一个凝聚力强的政策共同体,并且有领导者,但行动者的权力不仅限于卫生部门,指导机构和民间社会的作用只是最近才开始发挥作用。将非传染性疾病定义为四个风险因素和四种疾病,不一定能引起更广泛政策界专家的共鸣,但经济论点似乎已经使一些吸引力得以产生。虽然已经出现了许多政策窗口,但由于世界卫生组织的体制限制,它们的影响受到限制。可信的指标和有效的干预措施确实存在,但它们在全球,特别是在低收入和中等收入国家的适用性值得怀疑。为了取得成效,非传染性疾病运动需要超越全球卫生专家,培养民间社会并建立更广泛和更具包容性的全球治理结构。为非传染性疾病应用 Shiffman 和 Smith 框架使能够将非传染性疾病纳入联合国政策议程的不同因素得以分解。已经做了很多工作来阐述挑战和解决方案,但实施过程及其在全球的适用性仍然具有挑战性。非传染性疾病应对措施需要适应当地情况,充分关注疾病的预防和管理,并建立一个更强有力的全球治理结构。