Johns Hopkins International Injury Research Unit, Health Systems Program, Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
College of Health Sciences, School of Public Health, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2024;13:8347. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.8347. Epub 2024 Jul 22.
Few low- or middle-income countries (LMICs) have prioritized the expansion of rehabilitation services. Existing scholarship has identified that problem definition, governance, and structural factors are influential in the prioritization of rehabilitation. The objective of this study was to identify the factors influencing the prioritization and implementation of rehabilitation services in Uganda.
A case study design was utilized. The Prioritization of Rehabilitation in National Health Systems framework guided the study. Data sources included 33 key informant interviews (KIIs) with governmental and non-governmental stakeholders and peer-reviewed and grey literature on rehabilitation in Uganda. A thematic content analysis and concept map were conducted to analyze the data.
Rehabilitation is an unfunded priority in Uganda, garnering political attention but failing to receive adequate financial or human resource allocation. The national legacy of rehabilitation as a social program, instead of a health program, has influenced its present-day prioritization trajectory. These include a fragmented governance system, a weak advocacy coalition without a unified objective or champion, and a lack of integration into existing health systems structures that makes it challenging to scale-up service provision. Our findings highlight the interactive influences of structural, governance, and framing factors on prioritization and the importance of historical context in understanding both prioritization and implementation.
Our findings demonstrate challenges in prioritizing emerging, multi-sectoral health areas like rehabilitation. Strategic considerations for elevating rehabilitation on Uganda's policy agenda include generating credible indicators to quantify the nature and extent of the population's need and uniting governmental and non-governmental actors around a common vision for rehabilitation's expansion. We present opportunities for strengthening rehabilitation, both in Uganda and in similar contexts grappling with many health sector priorities and limited resources.
很少有中低收入国家(LMICs)优先扩大康复服务。现有研究表明,问题定义、治理和结构因素对康复的优先排序有影响。本研究的目的是确定影响乌干达康复服务优先排序和实施的因素。
采用案例研究设计。《国家卫生系统康复优先排序框架》指导了这项研究。数据来源包括与政府和非政府利益相关者的 33 次关键知情人访谈(KII)以及乌干达康复方面的同行评议和灰色文献。采用主题内容分析和概念图对数据进行分析。
康复在乌干达是一个未得到资金支持的优先事项,虽然引起了政治关注,但未能获得足够的财政或人力资源分配。康复作为一项社会项目而不是一项卫生项目的国家传统,影响了其目前的优先排序轨迹。这些因素包括分散的治理系统、没有统一目标或拥护者的薄弱宣传联盟,以及缺乏融入现有卫生系统结构,使得服务提供难以扩大。我们的研究结果强调了结构、治理和框架因素对优先排序的相互影响,以及了解优先排序和实施的历史背景的重要性。
我们的研究结果表明,在优先考虑康复等新兴多部门卫生领域方面存在挑战。将康复提升到乌干达政策议程上的战略考虑因素包括制定可信的指标来量化人口需求的性质和程度,并团结政府和非政府行为体,为康复的扩大制定共同愿景。我们提出了在乌干达和其他类似情况下加强康复的机会,这些国家都面临着许多卫生部门优先事项和有限资源的挑战。