Guice Jordan L, Gifford Shaun M, Hata Kai, Shi Xiaoming, Propper Brandon W, Kauvar David S
Department of Surgery, San Antonio Military Medical Center, Sam Houston, TX.
Vascular Surgery Service, San Antonio Military Medical Center, Sam Houston, TX.
Ann Vasc Surg. 2020 Jan;62:51-56. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2019.05.007. Epub 2019 Jun 13.
Despite aggressive limb salvage attempts, military popliteal artery injuries are associated with high amputation rates. Combined arterial and venous injuries present a management dilemma for military surgeons in austere settings, and the impact of vein injury management strategy on limb outcomes is not clear.
Military casualties sustaining combined ipsilateral popliteal artery and vein injuries from 2003 to 2016 were identified from a military vascular injury database. Limbs were grouped based on whether venous ligation or repair was initially performed. The primary outcome was secondary amputation; the secondary outcomes included limb and vascular/graft complications.
Fifty-six limbs were included; of which, 27 (48%) were managed with vein ligation and 29 (52%) with repair. Veins were repaired primarily in 13 (45%) cases with the remainder being treated with interposition grafts. Median injury severity score was higher in the ligation group (19 vs 15, P = 0.09), but vascular and concomitant limb injury characteristics were similar. Amputation rates did not differ by vein treatment (45% repair vs. 41% ligation, P = 0.76), and this held with injuries above and below the knee considered independently. Most (71%) amputations were performed <30 days from injury. Amputation was indicated more frequently for vascular repair failure in the ligated group (55% vs 15%, P = 0.04). Four graft infections were all in the repair group (P = 0.07 vs ligation). Arterial graft complications were more frequent with vein repair (45%) than ligation (30%), but this did not reach significance (P = 0.24). Only one deep vein thrombosis was diagnosed in each group (P = 0.96).
Type of management of concomitant popliteal vein injury was not associated with early or late amputation in this series of military popliteal artery injuries. Vein injury management may have had implications for the development of arterial graft and limb complications, however. Surgical decision-making regarding popliteal vein treatment should balance short-term contingencies with long-term limb salvage issues.
尽管积极尝试保肢治疗,但军事环境中的腘动脉损伤截肢率仍很高。动脉和静脉联合损伤给处于严峻环境中的军队外科医生带来了治疗难题,且静脉损伤处理策略对肢体预后的影响尚不清楚。
从军事血管损伤数据库中识别出2003年至2016年期间同侧腘动脉和静脉联合损伤的军事伤员。根据最初是进行静脉结扎还是修复将肢体分组。主要结局是二次截肢;次要结局包括肢体及血管/移植物并发症。
纳入56条肢体;其中,27条(48%)进行了静脉结扎,29条(52%)进行了修复。13例(45%)静脉进行了一期修复,其余采用间置移植物治疗。结扎组的损伤严重程度评分中位数较高(19比15,P = 0.09),但血管及伴随的肢体损伤特征相似。截肢率在静脉治疗方式上无差异(修复组为45%,结扎组为41%,P = 0.76),单独考虑膝关节以上和以下损伤时也是如此。大多数(71%)截肢在受伤后<30天进行。结扎组因血管修复失败而进行截肢的情况更常见(55%对15%,P = 0.04)。4例移植物感染均在修复组(与结扎组相比,P = 0.07)。静脉修复时动脉移植物并发症(45%)比结扎(30%)更频繁,但未达到显著差异(P = 0.24)。每组仅诊断出1例深静脉血栓形成(P = 0.96)。
在这一系列军事腘动脉损伤中,伴随的腘静脉损伤处理方式与早期或晚期截肢无关。然而,静脉损伤处理可能对动脉移植物和肢体并发症的发生有影响。关于腘静脉治疗的手术决策应在短期突发事件与长期保肢问题之间取得平衡。