Mitsuzawa Sadaki, Yamashita Shinnosuke, Tsukamoto Yoshihiro, Takeuchi Hisataka, Ota Satoshi, Onishi Eijiro, Kusakabe Kenji, Nakao Shota, Matsuoka Tetsuya, Yasuda Tadashi
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital, Kobe, Japan.
Department of Orthopaedic Trauma, Senshu Trauma and Critical Care Center, Rinku General Medical Center, Osaka, Japan.
J Emerg Trauma Shock. 2024 Jul-Sep;17(3):178-183. doi: 10.4103/jets.jets_164_23. Epub 2024 Sep 20.
While rare, popliteal artery injury is a potentially devastating complication of knee trauma. Delayed diagnosis or inadequate management of popliteal artery injury can result in limb ischemia, amputation, and long-term disability. This study aimed to compare the treatment outcomes of popliteal artery injury between different medical centers and to reconsider the optimal protocol at our institution.
Medical records of patients sustaining traumatic popliteal artery injury from 2011 to 2022 at two institutions (one hospital: Group A; the other hospital: Group B) were retrospectively reviewed. Demographic data, radiological assessment, time course and content of initial treatment, clinical outcomes, and follow-up period were recorded.
Group A included seven patients (dislocations, = 3; fractures, = 2; and glass penetration injuries, = 2), with a mean follow-up period of 39 months. Group B included five patients (dislocations, = 3 and fractures, = 2), with a mean follow-up period of 36 months. Two patients in Group A and four patients in Group B exhibited contrast-medium resumption (average deficit: 57 mm and 60 mm, respectively). The time from injury to reperfusion was significantly shorter in Group A than in Group B (300 min vs. 749 min, < 0.05). Group A underwent four temporary vascular shunting procedures, four external fixations, six fasciotomies, and five bypass grafting procedures. In Group B, temporary vascular shunt (TVS) was not used in any patient; however, three, two, and three patients underwent external fixation, fasciotomy, and bypass grafting, respectively. One patient in each group required above-the-knee amputation. The mean Lysholm score was 80.4 points in Group A and 72.0 points in Group B.
TVS considerably reduces the reperfusion time. Various options for the content and sequence of treatment must be carefully considered in advance. Early diagnosis, prompt intervention, and comprehensive management can improve the quality of care and patient outcomes.
腘动脉损伤虽罕见,但却是膝关节创伤潜在的毁灭性并发症。腘动脉损伤的延迟诊断或处理不当可导致肢体缺血、截肢及长期残疾。本研究旨在比较不同医疗中心腘动脉损伤的治疗结果,并重新审视我们机构的最佳治疗方案。
回顾性分析2011年至2022年在两家机构(一家医院:A组;另一家医院:B组)发生创伤性腘动脉损伤患者的病历。记录人口统计学数据、影像学评估、初始治疗的时间过程和内容、临床结果及随访期。
A组包括7例患者(脱位3例;骨折2例;玻璃穿透伤2例),平均随访期39个月。B组包括5例患者(脱位3例,骨折2例),平均随访期36个月。A组2例患者和B组4例患者出现造影剂恢复(平均缺损分别为57mm和60mm)。A组从受伤到再灌注的时间明显短于B组(300分钟对749分钟,P<0.05)。A组进行了4次临时血管分流术、4次外固定、6次筋膜切开术和5次旁路移植术。B组未对任何患者使用临时血管分流术(TVS);然而,分别有3例、2例和3例患者接受了外固定、筋膜切开术和旁路移植术。每组各有1例患者需要进行膝上截肢。A组的平均Lysholm评分为80.4分,B组为72.0分。
临时血管分流术可显著缩短再灌注时间。必须提前仔细考虑治疗内容和顺序的各种选择。早期诊断、及时干预和综合管理可提高护理质量和患者预后。