Department of Communicative Disorders, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, Rhode Island.
Department of Communicative Disorders, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, Rhode Island.
J Voice. 2020 Nov;34(6):961.e19-961.e26. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2019.05.012. Epub 2019 Jun 13.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relationships between acoustic measures of transfeminine voices and both self- and listener ratings of voice femininity. Connected speech samples were collected from 12 transfeminine individuals (M = 36.3 years, SD = 10.6 years) and a control group of five cisgender (cis) women and five cis men (M = 35.3 years, SD = 13.3 years). The acoustic measures of fundamental frequency (f), f variation, formant frequencies, and vocal intensity were calculated from these samples. Transfeminine speakers rated their own voices on a five-point scale of voice femininity. Twenty inexperienced listeners heard an excerpt of each speech sample and rated the voices on the same five-point scale of voice femininity. Spearman's rank-order correlation coefficients were calculated to measure the relationships between the acoustic variables and ratings of voice femininity. Significant positive correlations were found between f and both self-ratings (r = 0.712, P = 0.009) and listener ratings of voice femininity (r = 0.513, P < 0.001). Significant positive correlations were found between intensity and both self-ratings (r = 0.584, P = 0.046) and listener ratings of voice femininity (r = 0.584, P = 0.046). No significant correlations were found between f variation or formant frequencies and perceptual ratings of voice femininity. A Pearson's chi-square test of independence showed that the distribution of self- and listener ratings differed significantly (χ = 9.668, P = 0.046). Self- and listener ratings were also shown to be strongly correlated (r = 0.912, P < 0.001). This study provides further evidence to support the selection of training targets in voice feminization programs for transfeminine individuals and promotes the use of self-ratings of voice as an important outcome measure.
这项研究的目的是评估跨性别女性声音的声学测量值与自我和听众对声音女性化的评价之间的关系。从 12 名跨性别个体(M=36.3 岁,SD=10.6 岁)和 5 名顺性别女性(cis)和 5 名顺性别男性(M=35.3 岁,SD=13.3 岁)的连续语音样本中收集声学测量值。从这些样本中计算了基频(f)、f 变化、共振峰频率和声音强度的声学测量值。跨性别女性用五分制量表评价自己的声音女性化程度。20 名无经验的听众听到每个语音样本的一段摘录,并对声音女性化程度进行了五分制评价。采用 Spearman 秩相关系数来衡量声学变量与声音女性化评价之间的关系。f 与自我评价(r=0.712,P=0.009)和听众评价(r=0.513,P<0.001)之间存在显著正相关。强度与自我评价(r=0.584,P=0.046)和听众评价(r=0.584,P=0.046)之间存在显著正相关。f 变化或共振峰频率与声音女性化的感知评价之间没有显著相关性。Pearson 卡方独立性检验显示,自我评价和听众评价的分布差异显著(χ²=9.668,P=0.046)。自我评价和听众评价也显示出很强的相关性(r=0.912,P<0.001)。本研究进一步证明了在为跨性别个体进行声音女性化训练计划中选择训练目标的合理性,并提倡使用声音自我评价作为重要的结果测量指标。