• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

样本选择及未参与骨折事件预测因素与结果(PROFRAC)研究的原因。

Sample selection and reasons for non-participation in the PRedictors and Outcomes of incident FRACtures (PROFRAC) study.

作者信息

Stuart Amanda L, Pasco Julie A, Brennan-Olsen Sharon L, Berk Michael, Betson Amelia G, Bennett Katherine E, Timney Elizabeth N, Williams Lana J

机构信息

IMPACT Strategic Research Centre, School of Medicine, Barwon Health, Deakin University.

Department of Medicine - Western Health, University of Melbourne.

出版信息

J Public Health Res. 2019 May 3;8(1):1475. doi: 10.4081/jphr.2019.1475. eCollection 2019 Mar 11.

DOI:10.4081/jphr.2019.1475
PMID:31205902
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6547023/
Abstract

Fragility fractures, associated with osteoporosis, are an escalating public health problem. We aim to describe sample selection, recruitment methods and reasons for non-participation in The PRedictors and Outcomes of incident FRACtures (PROFRAC) study. Barwon Statistical Division residents aged 20+ years, with a radiologically-confirmed fracture between June 1 2012 and May 31 2013, were eligible. Individuals identified as fracture cases were invited by mail to complete a questionnaire. Reasons for non-participation were documented. Logistic regression techniques were used to determine odds ratios for participation and non-participation reasons. A total of 1,458 of 2,155 (67.7%) adults with fracture (48.7% men) participated. Individuals were excluded due to inability to give informed consent, death, no knowledge of fracture, or inability to be contacted. The odds of participation decreased with age (OR 0.99, 95%CI 0.99-0.99, P=0.011) and increased among specific fracture groups [clavicle/scapula (OR 2.50, 1.30-4.68, P=0.006), forearm/humerus (OR 2.00, 1.22-3.27, P=0.006), wrist (OR 2.08, 1.31-3.32, P=0.002), hip (OR 2.12, 1.20-3.75, P=0.009), ankle (OR 1.85, 1.20-2.87, P=0.001), compared to face/skull fractures]. The odds of reporting disinterest, time constraints or personal reasons as the reason for non-participation decreased with age, whereas the odds of reporting frailty, language-related issues or illness as the reason for non-participation increased with of age [disinterest (OR 0.98, 0.97-0.98, P<0.001), time constraints (OR 0.97, 0.96-0.98, P<0.001), personal reasons (OR 0.98, 0.97-0.99, P=0.007), frailty (OR 1.12, 1.09-1.15, P<0.001), language-related issues (OR 1.02, 1.01-1.04, P<0.001), illness (OR 1.03, 1.02-1.05, P<0.001)]. Understanding drivers of research participation can inform study design to achieve optimal participation in health research.

摘要

与骨质疏松症相关的脆性骨折是一个日益严重的公共卫生问题。我们旨在描述入选标准、招募方法以及未参与骨折事件预测与结果(PROFRAC)研究的原因。2012年6月1日至2013年5月31日期间,年龄在20岁及以上、经放射学确诊骨折的巴旺统计区居民符合条件。被确定为骨折病例的个体通过邮件邀请其填写问卷。记录未参与的原因。采用逻辑回归技术确定参与和未参与原因的比值比。2155名成年骨折患者(48.7%为男性)中,共有1458人(67.7%)参与。个体因无法给予知情同意、死亡、不知骨折情况或无法联系而被排除。参与的可能性随年龄降低(比值比0.99,95%置信区间0.99 - 0.99,P = 0.011),在特定骨折组中增加[锁骨/肩胛骨(比值比2.50,1.30 - 4.68,P = 0.006)、前臂/肱骨(比值比2.00,1.22 - 3.27,P = 0.006)、腕部(比值比2.08,1.31 - 3.32,P = 0.002)、髋部(比值比2.12,1.20 - ……

相似文献

1
Sample selection and reasons for non-participation in the PRedictors and Outcomes of incident FRACtures (PROFRAC) study.样本选择及未参与骨折事件预测因素与结果(PROFRAC)研究的原因。
J Public Health Res. 2019 May 3;8(1):1475. doi: 10.4081/jphr.2019.1475. eCollection 2019 Mar 11.
2
Sex-differences in reasons for non-participation at recruitment: Geelong Osteoporosis Study.招募时不参与的原因中的性别差异:吉朗骨质疏松症研究
BMC Res Notes. 2013 Mar 18;6:104. doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-6-104.
3
The Epidemiology of Incident Fracture from Cradle to Senescence.从摇篮到衰老期新发骨折的流行病学
Calcif Tissue Int. 2015 Dec;97(6):568-76. doi: 10.1007/s00223-015-0053-y. Epub 2015 Aug 29.
4
Rib fractures predict incident limb fractures: results from the European prospective osteoporosis study.肋骨骨折可预测肢体骨折的发生:欧洲前瞻性骨质疏松症研究结果
Osteoporos Int. 2006 Jan;17(1):41-5. doi: 10.1007/s00198-005-1887-3. Epub 2005 Jun 1.
5
The social gradient of fractures at any skeletal site in men and women: data from the Geelong Osteoporosis Study Fracture Grid.男性和女性任何骨骼部位骨折的社会梯度:来自吉朗骨质疏松症研究骨折网格的数据。
Osteoporos Int. 2015 Apr;26(4):1351-9. doi: 10.1007/s00198-014-3004-y. Epub 2015 Jan 9.
6
Sports participation and radiographic findings of adolescents treated nonoperatively for displaced clavicle fractures.非手术治疗移位锁骨骨折的青少年的运动参与情况及影像学表现。
Injury. 2015 Jul;46(7):1372-6. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2015.04.019. Epub 2015 Apr 23.
7
Epidemiology and economic burden of osteoporosis in Switzerland.瑞士的骨质疏松症流行病学和经济负担。
Arch Osteoporos. 2014;9:187. doi: 10.1007/s11657-014-0187-y. Epub 2014 Jun 27.
8
Major osteoporotic to hip fracture ratios in canadian men and women with Swedish comparisons: a population-based analysis.加拿大男性和女性主要骨质疏松性骨折与髋部骨折的比例及与瑞典的比较:一项基于人群的分析。
J Bone Miner Res. 2014;29(5):1067-73. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.2146.
9
Sports participation and fracture in older Australian men.老年人参与运动与骨折。
Arch Osteoporos. 2018 Apr 19;13(1):43. doi: 10.1007/s11657-018-0459-z.
10
Osteoporotic fractures and obesity affect frailty progression: a longitudinal analysis of the Canadian multicentre osteoporosis study.骨质疏松性骨折和肥胖会影响虚弱的进展:加拿大多中心骨质疏松研究的纵向分析。
BMC Geriatr. 2018 Jan 5;18(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s12877-017-0692-0.

引用本文的文献

1
Antipsychotic medication use and fracture: a case-control study.抗精神病药物的使用与骨折:一项病例对照研究。
Sci Rep. 2023 Aug 22;13(1):13709. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-40762-w.
2
Anticonvulsant use and fracture: a case-control study.抗惊厥药物的使用与骨折:一项病例对照研究。
J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact. 2021 Sep 1;21(3):422-428.

本文引用的文献

1
The Epidemiology of Incident Fracture from Cradle to Senescence.从摇篮到衰老期新发骨折的流行病学
Calcif Tissue Int. 2015 Dec;97(6):568-76. doi: 10.1007/s00223-015-0053-y. Epub 2015 Aug 29.
2
How to Establish and Follow up a Large Prospective Cohort Study in the 21st Century--Lessons from UK COSMOS.如何在21世纪建立和随访大型前瞻性队列研究——来自英国COSMOS的经验教训。
PLoS One. 2015 Jul 6;10(7):e0131521. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0131521. eCollection 2015.
3
Changes in quality of life associated with fragility fractures: Australian arm of the International Cost and Utility Related to Osteoporotic Fractures Study (AusICUROS).与脆性骨折相关的生活质量变化:骨质疏松性骨折国际成本与效用研究(AusICUROS)澳大利亚分部
Osteoporos Int. 2015 Jun;26(6):1781-90. doi: 10.1007/s00198-015-3088-z. Epub 2015 Mar 20.
4
Diagnosis and treatment of vertebral compression fractures.椎体压缩性骨折的诊断与治疗
Radiol Technol. 2015 Jan-Feb;86(3):301-20; quiz 321-3.
5
Risk of subsequent fractures and mortality in elderly women and men with fragility fractures with and without osteoporotic bone density: the Dubbo Osteoporosis Epidemiology Study.患有和未患有骨质疏松骨密度的老年女性和男性脆性骨折后再次骨折和死亡的风险:达博骨质疏松症流行病学研究
J Bone Miner Res. 2015 Apr;30(4):637-46. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.2393.
6
Associations between socioeconomic status and primary total knee joint replacements performed for osteoarthritis across Australia 2003-10: data from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry.2003年至2010年澳大利亚社会经济地位与因骨关节炎进行的初次全膝关节置换术之间的关联:来自澳大利亚骨科协会国家关节置换登记处的数据。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2014 Oct 28;15:356. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-15-356.
7
Aetiology of maxillofacial fractures: a review of published studies during the last 30 years.颌面骨折的病因学:对过去30年发表研究的综述
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014 Dec;52(10):901-6. doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2014.08.007. Epub 2014 Sep 15.
8
Cost-effectiveness of health research study participant recruitment strategies: a systematic review.健康研究中研究参与者招募策略的成本效益:一项系统评价
Clin Trials. 2014 Oct;11(5):576-83. doi: 10.1177/1740774514540371. Epub 2014 Jun 30.
9
Challenges and strategies pertaining to recruitment and retention of frail elderly in research studies: a systematic review.与研究中招募和保留虚弱老年人相关的挑战和策略:系统评价。
Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2014 Jul-Aug;59(1):18-24. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2014.03.006. Epub 2014 Mar 30.
10
Reaching the hard-to-reach: a systematic review of strategies for improving health and medical research with socially disadvantaged groups.难以接触的人群:改善健康和医学研究与社会弱势群体相关的策略的系统评价。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014 Mar 25;14:42. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-14-42.