Stuart Amanda L, Pasco Julie A, Brennan-Olsen Sharon L, Berk Michael, Betson Amelia G, Bennett Katherine E, Timney Elizabeth N, Williams Lana J
IMPACT Strategic Research Centre, School of Medicine, Barwon Health, Deakin University.
Department of Medicine - Western Health, University of Melbourne.
J Public Health Res. 2019 May 3;8(1):1475. doi: 10.4081/jphr.2019.1475. eCollection 2019 Mar 11.
Fragility fractures, associated with osteoporosis, are an escalating public health problem. We aim to describe sample selection, recruitment methods and reasons for non-participation in The PRedictors and Outcomes of incident FRACtures (PROFRAC) study. Barwon Statistical Division residents aged 20+ years, with a radiologically-confirmed fracture between June 1 2012 and May 31 2013, were eligible. Individuals identified as fracture cases were invited by mail to complete a questionnaire. Reasons for non-participation were documented. Logistic regression techniques were used to determine odds ratios for participation and non-participation reasons. A total of 1,458 of 2,155 (67.7%) adults with fracture (48.7% men) participated. Individuals were excluded due to inability to give informed consent, death, no knowledge of fracture, or inability to be contacted. The odds of participation decreased with age (OR 0.99, 95%CI 0.99-0.99, P=0.011) and increased among specific fracture groups [clavicle/scapula (OR 2.50, 1.30-4.68, P=0.006), forearm/humerus (OR 2.00, 1.22-3.27, P=0.006), wrist (OR 2.08, 1.31-3.32, P=0.002), hip (OR 2.12, 1.20-3.75, P=0.009), ankle (OR 1.85, 1.20-2.87, P=0.001), compared to face/skull fractures]. The odds of reporting disinterest, time constraints or personal reasons as the reason for non-participation decreased with age, whereas the odds of reporting frailty, language-related issues or illness as the reason for non-participation increased with of age [disinterest (OR 0.98, 0.97-0.98, P<0.001), time constraints (OR 0.97, 0.96-0.98, P<0.001), personal reasons (OR 0.98, 0.97-0.99, P=0.007), frailty (OR 1.12, 1.09-1.15, P<0.001), language-related issues (OR 1.02, 1.01-1.04, P<0.001), illness (OR 1.03, 1.02-1.05, P<0.001)]. Understanding drivers of research participation can inform study design to achieve optimal participation in health research.
与骨质疏松症相关的脆性骨折是一个日益严重的公共卫生问题。我们旨在描述入选标准、招募方法以及未参与骨折事件预测与结果(PROFRAC)研究的原因。2012年6月1日至2013年5月31日期间,年龄在20岁及以上、经放射学确诊骨折的巴旺统计区居民符合条件。被确定为骨折病例的个体通过邮件邀请其填写问卷。记录未参与的原因。采用逻辑回归技术确定参与和未参与原因的比值比。2155名成年骨折患者(48.7%为男性)中,共有1458人(67.7%)参与。个体因无法给予知情同意、死亡、不知骨折情况或无法联系而被排除。参与的可能性随年龄降低(比值比0.99,95%置信区间0.99 - 0.99,P = 0.011),在特定骨折组中增加[锁骨/肩胛骨(比值比2.50,1.30 - 4.68,P = 0.006)、前臂/肱骨(比值比2.00,1.22 - 3.27,P = 0.006)、腕部(比值比2.08,1.31 - 3.32,P = 0.002)、髋部(比值比2.12,1.20 - ……