School of Medicine & Public Health, Faculty of Health & Medicine, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia.
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014 Mar 25;14:42. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-14-42.
This study aims to review the literature regarding the barriers to sampling, recruitment, participation, and retention of members of socioeconomically disadvantaged groups in health research and strategies for increasing the amount of health research conducted with socially disadvantaged groups.
A systematic review with narrative synthesis was conducted. Searches of electronic databases Medline, PsychInfo, EMBASE, Social Science Index via Web of Knowledge and CINHAL were conducted for English language articles published up to May 2013. Qualitative and quantitative studies as well as literature reviews were included. Articles were included if they reported attempts to increase disadvantaged group participation in research, or the barriers to research with disadvantaged groups. Groups of interest were those described as socially, culturally or financially disadvantaged compared to the majority of society. Eligible articles were categorised according to five phases of research: 1) sampling, 2) recruitment and gaining consent, 3) data collection and measurement, 4) intervention delivery and uptake, and 5) retention and attrition.
In total, 116 papers from 115 studies met inclusion criteria and 31 previous literature reviews were included. A comprehensive summation of the major barriers to working with various disadvantaged groups is provided, along with proposed strategies for addressing each of the identified types of barriers. Most studies of strategies to address the barriers were of a descriptive nature and only nine studies reported the results of randomised trials.
To tackle the challenges of research with socially disadvantaged groups, and increase their representation in health and medical research, researchers and research institutions need to acknowledge extended timeframes, plan for higher resourcing costs and operate via community partnerships.
本研究旨在回顾有关在健康研究中对社会经济弱势群体进行抽样、招募、参与和保留方面的障碍的文献,并探讨增加对社会弱势群体进行健康研究的策略。
进行了系统的文献回顾和叙述性综合分析。对 Medline、PsychInfo、EMBASE、Web of Knowledge 中的社会科学索引和 CINHAL 电子数据库进行了英文文献检索,检索时间截至 2013 年 5 月。纳入了定性和定量研究以及文献综述。如果文章报告了增加弱势群体参与研究的尝试,或者报告了与弱势群体进行研究的障碍,那么这些文章就被纳入。感兴趣的群体是指与社会上的大多数人相比,在社会、文化或经济上处于劣势的群体。符合条件的文章根据研究的五个阶段进行分类:1)抽样,2)招募和获得同意,3)数据收集和测量,4)干预措施的提供和采用,以及 5)保留和流失。
共有 115 项研究的 116 篇论文符合纳入标准,同时还纳入了 31 篇先前的文献综述。本研究提供了一个全面总结了与各种弱势群体合作的主要障碍,并提出了针对每个已确定类型障碍的解决策略。大多数解决障碍的策略研究都是描述性的,只有九项研究报告了随机试验的结果。
为了应对与社会弱势群体进行研究的挑战,并增加他们在健康和医学研究中的代表性,研究人员和研究机构需要承认时间延长、计划更高的资源成本,并通过社区合作来开展工作。