Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Sweden.
The Swedish Council for Information on Alcohol and Other Drugs, Stockholm, Sweden.
Alcohol Alcohol. 2019 Jan 9;54(5):532-539. doi: 10.1093/alcalc/agz044.
The study aims to examine how socio-economic status (SES) among youth is related to binge-drinking and alcohol-related problems using three SES indicators: (i) SES of origin (parental education level), (ii) SES of the school environment (average parental education level at student's school) and (iii) SES of destination (academic orientation).
Cross-sectional data on upper secondary students (n= 4448) in Sweden. Multilevel logistic and negative binomial regression were used to estimate the relationship between each SES indicator and binge-drinking and alcohol-related problems, respectively.
Only SES of destination was significantly associated with binge-drinking, with higher odds for students in vocational programmes (OR= 1.42, 95% CI= 1.13-1.80). For the second outcome, SES of destination (rr=1.25; 95%CI=1.08-1.45) and SES of the school environment (rr=1.19, 95% CI=1.02-1.39) indicated more alcohol-related problems in vocational programmes and in schools with lower-educated parents. After adjustment for drinking patterns, the relationship remained for SES of the school environment, but became non-significant for SES of destination.
Our results suggest that the SES gradient among youth is stronger for alcohol-related problems than for harmful drinking. By only focusing on SES differences in harmful alcohol use, researchers may underestimate the social inequalities in adverse alcohol-related outcomes among young people. Our findings also support the notion that the environment young people find themselves in matters for social inequalities in alcohol-related harm.
本研究旨在使用三个社会经济地位(SES)指标(i)出身 SES(父母教育水平),(ii)学校环境 SES(学生所在学校的平均父母教育水平)和(iii)目标 SES(学业取向),探讨青少年 SES 与狂饮和与酒精相关问题的关系。
采用瑞典高中学生(n=4448)的横断面数据。使用多水平逻辑回归和负二项回归分别估计每个 SES 指标与狂饮和与酒精相关问题的关系。
只有目标 SES 与狂饮显著相关,职业课程学生的可能性更高(OR=1.42,95%CI=1.13-1.80)。对于第二个结果,目标 SES(rr=1.25;95%CI=1.08-1.45)和学校环境 SES(rr=1.19,95%CI=1.02-1.39)表明职业课程和父母教育水平较低的学校中与酒精相关的问题更多。在调整饮酒模式后,这种关系仍然存在于学校环境 SES 中,但对于目标 SES 则不再显著。
我们的结果表明,与有害饮酒相比,青少年的 SES 梯度与酒精相关问题更为明显。仅关注有害饮酒中的 SES 差异,研究人员可能会低估年轻人中与酒精相关的不良后果的社会不平等。我们的研究结果还支持这样一种观点,即年轻人所处的环境对与酒精相关的伤害的社会不平等具有重要意义。