Suppr超能文献

导乐助产模式下频繁就诊的决定因素和根本原因:一项探索性的横断面研究。

Determinants and underlying causes of frequent attendance in midwife-led care: an exploratory cross-sectional study.

机构信息

Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Midwifery Science, AVAG, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

ESRC funded Business and Local Government Data Research Centre (BLG DRC), School of Computing Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, NR4 7TJ, England, UK.

出版信息

BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019 Jun 17;19(1):203. doi: 10.1186/s12884-019-2316-5.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

An adequate number of prenatal consultations is beneficial to the health of the mother and fetus. Guidelines recommend an average of 5-14 consultations. Daily practice, however, shows that some women attend the midwifery practice more frequently. This study examined factors associated with frequent attendance in midwifery-led care.

METHODS

We conducted a cross-sectional study in a large midwifery practice in the Netherlands among low-risk women who started prenatal care in 2015 and 2016. Based on Andersen's behavioral model, we collected data on potential determinants from the digital midwifery's practice database. Prenatal healthcare utilization was measured by a revised version of the Kotelchuck Index, which measures a combination of care entry and numbers of visits. Logistic regression models were fitted to estimate the likelihood of frequent attendance compared to the recommended number of visits, adjusted for all relevant factors. Separate models were fitted on the non-referred and the referred group of obstetric-led care, as referral was found to be an effect modifier.

RESULTS

The prevalence of frequent attendance was 23% (243/1053), mainly caused by worries and/or vague complaints (44%; 106/243). Among non-referred women, 53% (560/1053), frequent attendance was associated with consultation with an obstetrician (OR = 3.99 (2.35-6.77)) and exposure to sexual violence (OR = 2.17 (1.11-4.24)). Among the referred participants, 47% (493/1053), frequent attendance was associated with a consultation with an obstetrician (OR = 2.75 (1.66-4.57)), psychosocial problems in the past or present (OR = 1.85 (1.02-3.35) or OR = 2.99 (1.43-6.25)), overweight (OR = 1.88 (1.09-3.24)), and deprived area (OR = 0.50 (0.27-0.92)).

CONCLUSION

Our exploratory study indicates that the determinants of frequent attendance in midwifery-led care differs between non-referred and referred women. Underlying causes for frequent attendance was mainly because of non-medical reasons.

IMPLICATION FOR PRACTICE

A trustful midwife-client relationship is known to be needed for clients such as frequent attenders to share more detailed, personal stories in case of vague complaints or worries, which is necessary to identify their implicit needs.

摘要

背景

足够数量的产前咨询有益于母婴健康。指南建议平均进行 5-14 次咨询。然而,日常实践表明,一些女性会更频繁地到助产士诊所就诊。本研究旨在调查与频繁就诊相关的因素。

方法

我们在荷兰一家大型助产士诊所进行了一项横断面研究,纳入 2015 年和 2016 年开始产前检查的低风险女性。基于安德森行为模型,我们从数字助产士实践数据库中收集潜在决定因素的数据。产前保健利用情况通过 Kotelchuck 指数的修订版进行测量,该指数衡量了护理开始和就诊次数的组合。使用逻辑回归模型估计与推荐就诊次数相比频繁就诊的可能性,调整了所有相关因素。针对非转诊和转诊的产科主导护理组分别进行了模型拟合,因为转诊被发现是一个效应修饰剂。

结果

频繁就诊的患病率为 23%(243/1053),主要是由担忧和/或模糊的抱怨引起的(44%;106/243)。在非转诊女性中,53%(560/1053)频繁就诊与与产科医生咨询(OR=3.99(2.35-6.77))和性暴力暴露(OR=2.17(1.11-4.24))有关。在转诊参与者中,47%(493/1053)频繁就诊与与产科医生咨询(OR=2.75(1.66-4.57))、过去或现在的心理社会问题(OR=1.85(1.02-3.35)或 OR=2.99(1.43-6.25))、超重(OR=1.88(1.09-3.24))和贫困地区(OR=0.50(0.27-0.92))有关。

结论

我们的探索性研究表明,在非转诊和转诊女性中,助产士主导护理中频繁就诊的决定因素不同。频繁就诊的根本原因主要是由于非医疗原因。

实践意义

众所周知,建立信任的医患关系对于频繁就诊者等客户是必要的,以便在出现模糊的抱怨或担忧时分享更详细的个人故事,这是识别他们隐含需求所必需的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e4c4/6580473/3e4d28c810c8/12884_2019_2316_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验