• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

乳牙龋齿去除的机械和化学机械方法的临床与微生物学分析

Clinical and Microbiological Analysis of Mechanical and Chemomechanical Methods of Caries Removal in Deciduous Teeth.

作者信息

Moimaz Suzely Adas Saliba, Okamura Audrey Quintella Coelho, Lima Daniela Coêlho, Saliba Tania Adas, Saliba Nemre Adas

出版信息

Oral Health Prev Dent. 2019;17(3):283-288. doi: 10.3290/j.ohpd.a42659.

DOI:10.3290/j.ohpd.a42659
PMID:31209448
Abstract

PURPOSE

This study evaluated carious tissue removal by mechanical and chemomechanical methods (Carisolv and Papacárie) through colony-forming unit (CFU) counts of Streptococcus mutans and Lactobacillus sp. Treatment acceptability, presence and level of pain, use of anesthesia, time required for caries removal and pain 24 h after treatment were also compared.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A clinical trial with 32 individuals who had at least two deciduous molars with active occlusal caries lesions were selected and randomly divided into two groups (I and II). One lesion in each individual was excavated with hand excavator only. The remaining lesions were excavated using modified hand excavation and Carisolv in group 1 or modified hand-excavation and Papacárie in group 2. Bacterial samples were taken from each caries lesion before and after treatment.

RESULTS

All the methods reduced the amount of cultivable Streptococcus mutans and Lactobacillus sp. after treatment (p < 0.05) and no statistically significant difference was found between the groups (p > 0.05). There was 97% acceptability of treatments, and anesthesia was used in 14% of teeth. Pain was present 24 h after treatment in 6% of teeth. The mean times for caries removal by the mechanical and chemomechanical treatments were not statistically significantly different (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

All treatments were found to effectively reduce bacterial counts (p < 0.05). There were no statistically significant differences (p > 0.05) among treatments or between clinical variables (p > 0.05).

摘要

目的

本研究通过变形链球菌和乳杆菌属的菌落形成单位(CFU)计数,评估机械法和化学机械法(Carisolv和Papacárie)去除龋坏组织的效果。同时比较了治疗的可接受性、疼痛的存在及程度、麻醉的使用、龋坏组织去除所需时间以及治疗后24小时的疼痛情况。

材料与方法

选取32名至少有两颗乳牙磨牙存在活动性咬合面龋损的个体进行临床试验,并随机分为两组(I组和II组)。每位个体的一个龋损仅用手用挖匙进行挖掘。其余龋损在第1组中采用改良手用挖掘和Carisolv进行处理,在第2组中采用改良手用挖掘和Papacárie进行处理。在治疗前后从每个龋损处采集细菌样本。

结果

所有方法在治疗后均减少了可培养的变形链球菌和乳杆菌属的数量(p < 0.05),且两组之间未发现统计学上的显著差异(p > 0.05)。治疗的可接受性为97%,14%的牙齿使用了麻醉。6%的牙齿在治疗后24小时出现疼痛。机械法和化学机械法去除龋坏组织的平均时间在统计学上无显著差异(p > 0.05)。

结论

所有治疗均能有效减少细菌数量(p < 0.05)。治疗方法之间或临床变量之间均未发现统计学上的显著差异(p > 0.05)。

相似文献

1
Clinical and Microbiological Analysis of Mechanical and Chemomechanical Methods of Caries Removal in Deciduous Teeth.乳牙龋齿去除的机械和化学机械方法的临床与微生物学分析
Oral Health Prev Dent. 2019;17(3):283-288. doi: 10.3290/j.ohpd.a42659.
2
Antibacterial Activity of Two Chemomechanical Caries Removal Gels on Carious Dentin of Primary Teeth: An in vitro Study.两种化学机械去龋凝胶对乳牙龋坏牙本质的抗菌活性:一项体外研究。
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2016 Dec 1;17(12):1027-1032.
3
A comparative study of the clinical efficiency of chemomechanical caries removal using Carisolv and Papacarie - a papain gel.使用Carisolv和Papacarie(一种木瓜蛋白酶凝胶)进行化学机械性龋损去除的临床效果比较研究。
Indian J Dent Res. 2012 Sep-Oct;23(5):697. doi: 10.4103/0970-9290.107429.
4
Clinical evaluation of chemomechanical and mechanical caries removal: status of the restorations at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months.化学机械法与机械法去除龋坏组织的临床评估:修复体在3、6、9和12个月时的状况
Clin Oral Investig. 2007 Mar;11(1):69-76. doi: 10.1007/s00784-006-0072-1. Epub 2006 Sep 13.
5
Clinical and microbiological evaluation of the carious dentin before and after application of Papacarie gel.应用Papacarie凝胶前后龋损牙本质的临床和微生物学评估。
J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2013 Winter;38(2):133-8. doi: 10.17796/jcpd.38.2.2j237v545437527m.
6
Chemomechanical caries removal in primary molars : evaluation of marginal leakage and shear bond strength in bonded restorations--an in vitro study.乳牙化学机械去龋:粘结修复体边缘微渗漏及剪切粘结强度的评估——一项体外研究
J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2013 Spring;37(3):269-74. doi: 10.17796/jcpd.37.3.a56x8502133706nq.
7
Efficacy and tolerance of papain gel with conventional drilling method: a clinico-microbiological study.木瓜蛋白酶凝胶与传统钻孔方法的疗效及耐受性:一项临床微生物学研究
J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2015 Winter;39(2):109-12. doi: 10.17796/jcpd.39.2.n25754863557k727.
8
Chemical, morphological and microhardness changes of dentine after chemomechanical caries removal.牙本质在化学机械去龋后的化学、形态和显微硬度变化。
Aust Dent J. 2013 Sep;58(3):283-92. doi: 10.1111/adj.12093. Epub 2013 Aug 6.
9
Effectiveness of 2 chemomechanical caries removal methods on residual bacteria in dentin of primary teeth.两种化学机械去龋方法对乳牙牙本质中残留细菌的有效性。
Pediatr Dent. 2012 Jul-Aug;34(4):325-30.
10
Comparison of chemomechanical caries removal using Carisolv or conventional hand excavation in deciduous teeth in vitro.在体外对乳牙使用伢典化学机械去龋法或传统手工挖除法的比较。
J Dent. 2005 Feb;33(2):87-90. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2004.07.007.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative evaluation of Papacarie and Carisolv in effective chemomechanical carious dentin removal in primary teeth: A systematic review.Papacarie与Carisolv用于乳牙有效化学机械性龋坏牙本质去除的比较评价:一项系统评价
Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2025 Aug 25;22:33. doi: 10.4103/drj.drj_205_23. eCollection 2025.
2
Chemomechanical Caries Removal with Enzymatic Technology: A Comparative Study.酶技术用于化学机械性龋病去除的比较研究
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2025 Mar;18(3):245-250. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-3067. Epub 2025 Apr 19.
3
Efficacy of chemo-mechanical caries removal: a 24-month randomized trial.
化学机械去龋的疗效:一项为期24个月的随机试验。
Front Oral Health. 2024 Dec 3;5:1458530. doi: 10.3389/froh.2024.1458530. eCollection 2024.
4
ART with or without the aid of chemo-mechanical agents: a systematic review.ART 联合或不联合化学机械制剂:系统综述。
Clin Oral Investig. 2024 Oct 9;28(11):581. doi: 10.1007/s00784-024-05931-9.
5
Efficacy of antiseptics and chemomechanical methods for dentin caries lesions: A systematic review with GRADE approach.防腐剂和化学机械方法治疗牙本质龋损的疗效:采用GRADE方法的系统评价
Front Oral Health. 2023 Feb 22;4:1110634. doi: 10.3389/froh.2023.1110634. eCollection 2023.
6
A Bibliometric Analysis (2010-2020) of the Dental Scientific Literature on Chemo-Mechanical Methods of Caries Removal Using Carisolv and BRIX3000.使用 Carisolv 和 BRIX3000 的化学机械去龋方法的牙科学文献的计量学分析(2010-2020 年)
Medicina (Kaunas). 2022 Jun 11;58(6):788. doi: 10.3390/medicina58060788.
7
Oral Healthcare Management of Children after COVID-19 Outbreak.新冠疫情爆发后儿童的口腔保健管理
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2021 Mar-Apr;14(2):293-297. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1906.